Search results

Give? Yes, definitely, at your local Christian fellowship where you are attending regularly. Also, give to support causes in your area that either actively spread the gospel or operate consistently with it. If you're a Christian, you are not required in Scripture to "tithe".

Since you claim, at least by implication, to believe the Bible, why don't you act according to its instruction? These insults are quite inappropriate on the lips (or fingertips) of a Bible believer.

You still have not answered the question. A straightforward answer, please; no more avoiding. And no, science is not all of Satan. Don't be closed-minded. You are using the internet, which is built on the principles of... science. You might want to check your gross hypocrisy at the door.

I'm doing well, thanks. Respectfully, you didn't answer my question.

See my post #679. You have some thinking to do. This is not about my view of holiness, but yours, as you have made claims about it.

It appears that you don't hold to double inspiration as Ruckman held; that's a good thing. You do, however, hold to inspired guidance, which leaves you in the impossible position of explaining the inconsistencies in the "Spirit-guided" KJV.

Since Psalm 12:6-7 does not actually say anything about refining the word of God, your view is incoherent. That aside, you previously stated, quoting Scripture, that the word of God is perfect and pure. If the previous versions were not "perfect and pure", then by your own logic, they were not...

Again, your interpretation of Psalm 12:7 is fundamentally wrong. The other verses don't support the idea of preservation, but of endurance; they are not the same thing. Okay... let's address those verses specifically. You believe God's word which says the word of God "cannot be broken" and is...

You can "see" whatever you like, but I encourage you to do the hard research to discover what the Hebrew says. The typical KJV-only interpretation is incorrect. No, they don't. There isn't a single major doctrine that is negatively affected in any of the main modern translations. You're paying...

Um, no, I don’t need to prove my case, because I didn’t make the original claim; you did. I am not going to accept your attempt to employ the burden-of-proof reversal fallacy. What you call “a pretty basic biblical concept” (that you haven’t supported with Scripture) is nothing more than a...

And? What of it? And since you have used it, what do you think “firmament” means?

Do you believe the earth is flat too?

Agreed… which means that men who happen to have “long” hair should not be judged according to worldly standards of short and long. The common and immediate judgment is that anyone who doesn’t outwardly conform to “my” understanding of right and wrong is “following the world”. *That* is...

You could always give them the obvious answer: “Because I’m not married.” Or perhaps, “I haven’t found anyone as amazing as me”… delivered with a hearty smile. Of course, if your secret crush asks, then the answer is, “Because you haven’t asked me!”

So you believe in double inspiration? I hope not. If so, you don’t need to bother arguing for the translators’ skill or abilities, nor in the textual sources for the KJV, nor be using any format other than the 1611. No Blaney, no Cambridge, no Oxford.

Miss the point much? Where in Scripture does it say, “Something that is holy from God does not have errors”?

Only KJV-onlyists believe that the "them" in verse 7 refers to words rather than people. Only KJV-onlyists can't understand that "preserve them from this generation" means "keep safe from the evils of this generation". Only KJV-onlyists don't comprehend the nature of simile, used here to...

Where is that in Scripture?

Psalm 12 isn't going to help you here.