Search results

“God wouldn’t command man to do something he’s not able to so. Therefore, man, of his own will and power, is able to believe, to be sinless…” Pelagius, Wesley, Arminius…

l Matthew 7-majority and minority.

That’s not what at all what I said. But yes, your statement of God never answering Job’s questions is in perfect alignment with Joel Osteen and company-blind guides.

When the Lord opens the eyes of the blind there is no more accusatory line of questioning, it ceases. Job 42:5-5 I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee. Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes. (Repent for what-his sinful questioning of God...

Never followed a study guide on Job in Sunday school or church Bible study? How about YouTube, watch some videos on Job did ya?

“so i see this as something primarily for the angels - God only replies to Job essentially, 'Who are you to question me?” Your words buddy 👆 “God never answered Job’s questions…” 👆classic commentary regurgitate. God answered every accusation/question Job had at the first utterance from the...

So the book of Job is about God‘s desire to prove something to the angels at Job and his families expense, then God gets mad at Job for questioning him?

Are you quoting satan in an attempt to prove Job’s fearfulness/faith in God? 😆

Professing believers say a lot of things but we'll know them by their fruit right? 👈This alone was my response to you, sorry it was lumped in with my response to the other guy.

Professing believers say a lot of things but we'll know them by their fruit right? Now let me ask some questions if I may-not for you to answer me but, for you to answer yourself. Have I said anything derogatory or heretical towards God, the scripture etcetera? Or did I simply state my view...

All things considered, nope. Just read Job's response, he says it himself... Job 42:1 Then Job answered the Lord, and said, 2 I know that thou canst do every thing, and that no thought can be withholden from thee. 3 Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge? therefore have I uttered that...

Job 1:1 There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was perfect and upright... The word "perfect" here is tamim. Meaning moral, pious, without blemish, having integrity etc.. Eze 28:15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created... Speaking of...

I see what you're saying, trials do bring true believers closer to God. However, all things considered, it's simply not the case here. As mentioned previously, read Elihu's words-Job 32,33 onward through God's rebuke and Job's response...

I think you're missing the point of the verse friend. Nobody saw God that day, he merely spoke out of a whirlwind. Job is admitting he had heard of God but now he sees. It's what all us believers experience at salvation right pal? I once was blind but now I see...🎵

I once was blind but now I see..🎵

Seems you missed the point friend. The post was about understanding the book of Job and more importantly, getting a better glimpse of God. When we read Job through the lens of the common commentary regurgitate, we're left with a pissing contest between God and satan-at "faithful" Job's...

Paul- The Holy Spirit -in Philippians stated Paul was righteous and blameless as well. Philippians 3:5 circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee; 6 as to zeal, a persecutor of the church; as to righteousness...

A major key in understanding Job starts in chapter 32 with Elihu, the only one of the group God doesn't rebuke.

Romans 8:29 [29] For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. Not sure how this helps your 4 point Arminianism argument 😅

Let me guess, "definitions are for legalistic pharisaical vipers"? 😂