Search results

I think that the second half of Romans 1 hearkens back to Genesis 2, where God told Adam (& Eve and the rest of mankind by extension) that in the day that he eats from the tree of the knowledge of good & evil, he would surely die. Romans 1 is one part of Scripture that shows us where that...

Welcome to CC, Haliz!

Welcome to CC!

A lot of people have asked why Jesus was crucified by the Romans rather than stoned by the Jews. After all, He, according to the Jewish leaders, had committed blasphemy by claiming to be God. In the Old Testament, the prescribed penalty for blasphemy was stoning. There's also the issue of...

Right. If I wanted to go hear a motivational speech, I'd just pick a secular venue........... :cautious:

"God's just waiting for you to act" (As if He needs our permission or prompting to do anything)

Based on what I've read about the history of Laodicea, both hot and cold water served good, although different, purposes. The hot water was for cleansing and such, while the cold water was for refreshment. Lukewarm water wasn't good for much of anything. In light of this, it would appear...

I just started thinking about this: Romans 3 says that the Law stops every mouth and that all of mankind is held guilty before God because of it. Romans 7 says that the Law is not sin; rather it is holy, just and good. Galatians 3 says that the Law was our schoolmaster/tutor and was added...

What's with people coming here recently and accusing us of not being Christians or of having, shall I say, "low intelligence"? What gives here? :rolleyes:

Welcome to CC, Hannah! By the way, I have a cousin with that name. :D

Oh boy, here we go again................... :cautious:

Buckle up y'all! This is gonna be a fun (ahem) ride! ;)

Come on in; the water's fine! ;)

Hmmmm, I seem to recall a recent poster who claimed that some of us "didn't know anything". :cautious:

Jujitsu is also good. wait..............wrong Keto.............. carry on.............. :p

I really don't know at this point; I suppose I'm thinking pragmatically. I suspect that Trump is being pragmatic too, at least to some extent.

I don't think that Trump is going to take back the Presidency at this point. It would be really bad optics, and he knows it. Even with all the evidence indicating that the election was stolen, it just wouldn't be a good look for him. You'd have a whole bunch of people, even some who might...

I'm flatter than a pancake that's been pressed by a steamroller.