JamesSsb,
Changes in the NIV make Jesus indignant! This is what you are saying about NIV being clear. The NIV is drifting down towards apostasy.
NIV 1973, 1978, 1984 - “FILLED WITH COMPASSION, Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man.”
NIV 2011 - “Jesus WAS INDIGNANT. He reached out his...
Already answered this. You may read this link so not to rehash:
Post-2652
https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/the-error-of-kjv-onlyism.213525/page-133
Strange tongue, how can God speak which is not understandable. You are the one saying we should bible better understood but your Niv isn't clear for the God described is speaking that could not be understood. Your Niv really is strange one.
Here's another prophecy that no other versions of the world would fit except KJB
Isaiah 28:11-14
King James Version
11 For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people.
12 To whom he said, This is the rest wherewith ye may cause the weary to rest; and this is the...
Umm, as far as my analysis is concerned KJB is not in error and you are in an opinion of two interpretation which Greek word can be said of either it is imperative as in the KJB and Declarative or indicative as the NIV does.
Using the imperative means of vital importance is crucial. It is an...
BTW, I have provided the reference to why they hated the TR -calls them 'villainous' and 'vile'. Do you think that is a good valid reason? or there are other reasons? Can you offer me substantial input that I can consider? Thanks
https://ia800708.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/22/items/crossref-pre-1909-scholarly-works/10.1086%252F472264.zip&file=10.1086%252F476546.pdf
I think this was also been touched by Nehemiah and Biblehighliter
Umm, I think we need to know why the Revisers of 1881 wanted KJB and its Greek text to be revised. i sense we need to go over that. Giving an opinion is great but what is great if you know the other side of it. I have stated previously in one of my posts that the revisers of 1881 hated and...
I would have to agree with you that sometimes words were added in English and retained their sense but usually in the KJB, words were put into italics as a sort of honesty wherein they cannot be found in Greek. The so-called modernized didn't yet the issue is why KJB seems wrong not putting the...
Is there still a need to add 'You" in our given text of John 5:39 so that KJB is in error? Please provide justifications why KJB is wrong, otherwise those presumptions were just flat-out wrong. Thanks
This is also a claim of Benjamin Jowett, Regius Professor of Greek at Oxford.
The Life and Letter of Benjamin Jowwet p.406
https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=sFBAAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA408-IA1&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q&f=false
Yes, Biblehighlither, am using my cellphone now with limited data connection, Ill try to forward this to James. This is a good reference as to rhe academic credentials of the Kjv translators. I believe it is a good read. Thanks for the link. God bless
Biased but I did references Bill Mounce, which is the same as of Thayer and Syrongs Definition. I did referenced Lidell Scott, iused the OEd, the Niv as comparison and the Gothic bible and you are saying it bias opinion. So now what is you opinion? Thanks
Here's my take on this:
Peddle or corrupt the word of God
2 Corinthians 2:17
King James Version
17 For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
New International Version
17 Unlike so many, we do not...
John who is also a n eyewitness of the event is consistent withe the gospel writer using the Kjb unlike the net or the niv. What bible corrupted the narrative, the net as well the Niv.
Umm, I just think you are just new to the bible version issue. Thanks
Yes, I agree, thats why i said in my earlier post that i am into a gnat straining. However, ridiculous at it may, some ignore honesty, that God's word dint tell a lie as the bible say, "...let God be true, but every man a liar...