WHAT????? CHURCH FATHERS WERE PRETRIB ???

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
In the last part of the vid,we see a ton of reference to ancient pre trib rapture teaching.

I had a debunking of the claim that Irenaeus was talking about a pretribulational rapture. If you actually read through his 'Against Heresies' eschatology, Irenaeus uses the term 'Anti-Christ' for the beast figure, and writes about the beast making war on the church. I think this guy is trying to redefine that as Israel. Oh brother.

He's trying to explain away this from chapter 26.
" “And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, who have received no kingdom as yet, but shall receive power as if kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and give their strength and power to the beast. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them, because He is the Lord of lords and the King of kings.” 228 It is manifest, therefore, that of these [potentates], he who is to come shall slay three, and subject the remainder to his power, and that he shall be himself the eighth among them. And they shall lay Babylon waste, and burn her with fire, and shall give their kingdom to the beast, and put the Church to flight. After that they shall be destroyed by the coming of our Lord. For that the kingdom must be divided, and thus come to ruin, the Lord [declares when He] says: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.” "

Notice the beast puts the CHURCH to flight.


Let's look at the passage he quotes, available here: https://catholiclibrary.org/library...e church shall be caught up;chunk.id=00000171

"as stubble conduces towards the growth of the wheat, and its straw, by means of combustion, serves for working gold. And therefore, when in the end the Church shall be suddenly caught up from this, it is said, “There shall be tribulation such as has not been since the beginning, neither shall be.” For this is the last contest of the righteous, in which, when they overcome they are crowned with incorruption.
2. And there is therefore in this beast, when he comes, a recapitulation made of all sorts of iniquity and of every deceit, in order that all apostate power, flowing into and being shut up in him, may be sent into the furnace of fire"

The tribulation is the last contest of the righteous. the church will be caught up from it. They overcome the last contest.

i'm a little suspcious of the Greek scholarship of someone who pronounces the name Eye reneaus. I mean, that's not an option. I mean it's Εἰρηναῖος so it's either something like 'ee' in English with no dipthong but short or something like Fonzi saying 'ey' with his thumbs up. It's not 'eye' on that first syllabus.

I am a bit suspicious also, because I believe some of portions of this book survive in ___Latin__ not in Greek, if he is reading the Greek texts. And to treat this like this is such a great secret discovery, some secret document.

It is not realistic to think that Irenaeus was pretrib. I mean, where would he have gotten the idea? it's not in the Bible. In II Thessalonians 2, the man of sin is destroyed at the brightness of the Lord's coming... which is also mentioned in verse 1. And the rapture occurs at Jesus' coming in I Thessalonians 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slimsumo
I had a debunking of the claim that Irenaeus was talking about a pretribulational rapture. If you actually read through his 'Against Heresies' eschatology, Irenaeus uses the term 'Anti-Christ' for the beast figure, and writes about the beast making war on the church. I think this guy is trying to redefine that as Israel. Oh brother.

He's trying to explain away this from chapter 26.
" “And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, who have received no kingdom as yet, but shall receive power as if kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and give their strength and power to the beast. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them, because He is the Lord of lords and the King of kings.” 228 It is manifest, therefore, that of these [potentates], he who is to come shall slay three, and subject the remainder to his power, and that he shall be himself the eighth among them. And they shall lay Babylon waste, and burn her with fire, and shall give their kingdom to the beast, and put the Church to flight. After that they shall be destroyed by the coming of our Lord. For that the kingdom must be divided, and thus come to ruin, the Lord [declares when He] says: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.” "

Notice the beast puts the CHURCH to flight.


Let's look at the passage he quotes, available here: https://catholiclibrary.org/library...e church shall be caught up;chunk.id=00000171

"as stubble conduces towards the growth of the wheat, and its straw, by means of combustion, serves for working gold. And therefore, when in the end the Church shall be suddenly caught up from this, it is said, “There shall be tribulation such as has not been since the beginning, neither shall be.” For this is the last contest of the righteous, in which, when they overcome they are crowned with incorruption.
2. And there is therefore in this beast, when he comes, a recapitulation made of all sorts of iniquity and of every deceit, in order that all apostate power, flowing into and being shut up in him, may be sent into the furnace of fire"

The tribulation is the last contest of the righteous. the church will be caught up from it. They overcome the last contest.

i'm a little suspcious of the Greek scholarship of someone who pronounces the name Eye reneaus. I mean, that's not an option. I mean it's Εἰρηναῖος so it's either something like 'ee' in English with no dipthong but short or something like Fonzi saying 'ey' with his thumbs up. It's not 'eye' on that first syllabus.

I am a bit suspicious also, because I believe some of portions of this book survive in ___Latin__ not in Greek, if he is reading the Greek texts. And to treat this like this is such a great secret discovery, some secret document.

It is not realistic to think that Irenaeus was pretrib. I mean, where would he have gotten the idea? it's not in the Bible. In II Thessalonians 2, the man of sin is destroyed at the brightness of the Lord's coming... which is also mentioned in verse 1. And the rapture occurs at Jesus' coming in I Thessalonians 4.
Yes
I do believe he was postrib, I read his thoughts in vol 5.
 
LoL! No, you tried to claim that the Lord LIED in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3

2 Thessalonians 2:1-3
Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto Him,
That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition

Reality called and wants to know when you and your buddy are going to pull your head out! View attachment 284174
View attachment 284175





I never said I was post trib

2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 tells us the rapture happens mid trib





Well then prepare thyself to DIE





Then you should stop spouting your mistranslation
Mid trib does not work.
Rev 14:14 has a mid trib gathering that Is NOT the gathering of 1 thes 4.

No need for nasty comments.
 
I understand that you don't know but it is 100% symbolic and that is what Iraneaus said that you PURPOSELY Maligned just like your original post claiming that the Church Father's believed something they never claimed.

I guess I will now treat you the same as I have any other liar from point forward.
You are a nasty individual.
Sad
 
Mid trib does not work.
Rev 14:14 has a mid trib gathering that Is NOT the gathering of 1 thes 4.

No need for nasty comments.
Wow. You know I have been settled on my view of the rapture for years now, but I am starting to return to my roots so to speak. When I got saved I did believe in the pre-trib rapture. Then I read Matthew 24:29-31, matched it up with 1 Thess 4:16-17, Rev 11:15 and 1 Cor 15:51-53 and called it a day.

Now I am starting to realize it is not so simple. Where do we place the judgment seat of Christ, sheep and goats judgment, no resurrection mentioned in Matthew 24

And another thing I noticed was, when I look at Jesus' description of the Second Advent, it is so slow of a process that you can turn around and get some things from your house if you are on the roof top (Don't do that though, Jesus warns not to!) but the rapture revealed to Paul is so fast its in the blink of an eye, no time to go back and get anything.

Do you have any studies/sermons/articles you would recommend to me on the subject? I know you are one of the resident pre-tribbers here. [ I wonder where @TheDivineWatermark person has gone. ]
 
You are a nasty individual.
Sad
Nasty enough to stomp your vile attempt to change the writings of men already in Heaven and trying to make them look like a fool.

You haven't even made it to Heaven and here tearing down men who are in Heaven.

Nasty is what has your eternal soul bound up with.
 
If you don't believe that taking Communion is receiving the literal body and blood of Yeshua then you are not Saved!!

I don't believe it. The lord's supper was the covenant meal and the bread and wine were/are figurative for the sacrifice of his life. Paul said the meal is done to proclaim the death of Jesus which sealed the covenant. It is a proclamation and witness of our faith; a remembrance of the covenant that remits our sins.
 
I don't believe it. The lord's supper was the covenant meal and the bread and wine were/are figurative for the sacrifice of his life. Paul said the meal is done to proclaim the death of Jesus which sealed the covenant. It is a proclamation and witness of our faith; a remembrance of the covenant that remits our sins.
Can you answer my question I know you and I share quite a bit similar beliefs based on me reading your post history here, I said:


"Now I am starting to realize it is not so simple. Where do we place the judgment seat of Christ, sheep and goats judgment, no resurrection mentioned in Matthew 24

And another thing I noticed was, when I look at Jesus' description of the Second Advent, it is so slow of a process that you can turn around and get some things from your house if you are on the roof top (Don't do that though, Jesus warns not to!) but the rapture revealed to Paul is so fast its in the blink of an eye, no time to go back and get anything. "
 
Can you answer my question I know you and I share quite a bit similar beliefs based on me reading your post history here, I said:


"Now I am starting to realize it is not so simple. Where do we place the judgment seat of Christ, sheep and goats judgment, no resurrection mentioned in Matthew 24

And another thing I noticed was, when I look at Jesus' description of the Second Advent, it is so slow of a process that you can turn around and get some things from your house if you are on the roof top (Don't do that though, Jesus warns not to!) but the rapture revealed to Paul is so fast its in the blink of an eye, no time to go back and get anything. "

I think the sheep/goats judgment is probably referring to the 2nd resurrection

In Matthew 24:2 Jesus said the temple would be destroyed. In the next verse his disciples asked him 2 or 3 questions: 1) when will the temple be destroyed, 2) what will be the sign of his coming, 3) and of the end of the age? So Matthew 24 is Jesus' answer to these 3 questions. And 2 of the questions are more complex than they appear.

Which coming? Coming in judgment against Jerusalem in 70AD, or his 2nd coming?

The end of which age? The end of the age of the Jews, or the end of the age of the gentiles?

So Jesus is explaining scenarios more complex than the disciples had the capacity to understand. And it takes spiritual discernment for us to sort everything out
 
Nasty enough to stomp your vile attempt to change the writings of men already in Heaven and trying to make them look like a fool.

You haven't even made it to Heaven and here tearing down men who are in Heaven.

Nasty is what has your eternal soul bound up with.
More flat out nasty.
Whew....get you some Jesus time in.