Written fir our Admonition 1 Corinthians 10:11

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
14,670
5,913
113
#21
Paul says the things that were written in the Old Testament are “our examples” verse 6, so that we should not sin as they did, and “they were written for our admonition. One version says for our learning. Many of the stories in the Old Testament have wonderful spiritual lessons for us today in the 21st century. One such story can be found in 2 Kings 6 & 7.

The city of Samaria was surrounded by the Syrian army with its horses and chariots. The Israelites inside the city were starving. A donkey’s head sold for 80 shekels of silver; they were eating dove droppings and even began eating their children (6:39)
The King of Samaria blames Elisha, God’s prophet for this and he and one of his officers go to Elisha’s house in the city. The King thinks waiting on God is useless, but Elisha says, “Hear the WORD OF THE LORD, Thus says the Lord…” by about this time tomorrow there will be plenty of food and it will be sold at everyday prices.

The officer that came with the King said that that couldn’t be so, “even if God made windows in heaven.” Although he did not express it, He didn’t believe in God’s word or His power. He was basically calling God a liar. Elisha’s response was, “ you shall see it with your eyes, but you will not eat of it.” How God brought this to pass is a wonderful story, and you can read about it in chapter 7. The next morning, it happened just as Elisha predicted; there was enough food outside the gate of Samaria to feed the entire city of starving people, “according to the word of the Lord.” The King put the officer that did not believe what God said, in charge of opening the gate, and when he did, the people in their rush to get to the food, trampled him to death. “Just as Elisha said.”

What is the lesson in this story for us today in the 21st century? Isn’t it that we should BELIEVE God’s word? Many people today do not hold what God says in very high esteem. Many believe in their own ideas, or “feelings” OVER what God has said in the Bible. But the Bible is the word of God and it is how God talks to us today. John 12:47-48 Jesus says “If anyone hears (reads) my words and does not believe…He who rejects me and does not receive my words, has that which judges him—the word that I have spoken will judge him in the last day.” Our punishment for not believing what God has said may not be PHYSICAL death as it was for that officer of the King in 2 Kings 7, but even worse, it will be SPIRITUAL death and eternal separation from God.
its amazing what we begin to learn when we actually read sections of the Bible and how clear it is and how practical the lessons we learn are so different from what we heard from someone else before

“Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; and did all eat the same spiritual meat; and did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness. Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted. Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand. Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents. Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer.

Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.”
‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭10:1-11‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Meat and potatoes makes a person grow up
 

Aaron56

Well-known member
Jul 12, 2021
3,045
1,800
113
#22
its amazing what we begin to learn when we actually read sections of the Bible and how clear it is and how practical the lessons we learn are so different from what we heard from someone else before

“Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; and did all eat the same spiritual meat; and did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness. Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted. Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand. Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents. Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer.

Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.”
‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭10:1-11‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Meat and potatoes makes a person grow up
Presently, church leaders have a financial interest to keep the people young and immature in their walk with the Lord.
 
May 15, 2019
695
230
43
#23
much of Christianity does indeed discount the old testament but the same can be said of the new testament as well due to the specific denomination or doctrine one holds.

This is why there has to be a reverence for his word we cannot believe one part and not another his word is his word so if we hold his word as highlly as we claim we cannot be adding or subtracting it as we see fit.
It isn't that there is no reverence for his word but it certainly isn't revered as it should be if we believe one part but not another

I think this is what the op was talking about I don't think they were injecting their own view they were making a point that we should take heart.
You got it! Thank you.
 
May 15, 2019
695
230
43
#24
If it is so important to believe what God said, why was it necessary for you to change it?
And how did I do that?
We all to some degree overcomplicate or disregard the word of God or insert our own beliefs into it it is human nature and it is a constant dedicated practice to die to that line of thinking.
What interests me is how easy it is to do this but hard not to this makes it require dedication to listen to his word with our hearts solely to hear him not ourselves.

The whole bible is the word of God from eevery letter and number in it all of it is the spoken word of God imagine if we treated it like that I mean imagine standing before God himself as he is speaking to you all that is written would you inject what you think or cherry pick some of what he says? would you use it to attack others or to show how superior you are in being well versed in his word?

I am guessing not the fear of the Lord would never allow it you wouldn'y dare yet because we are not before him how easily his word is abused or used for the wrong reason or how easily it is interpreted instead of heard we all have to really think about this but to speak on the op maybe I missed something and they are saying something else but from what I can tell there didn't seem to be any personal agenda as far as I could tell
Thank you.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,191
30,326
113
#25
And how did I do that?
Really? You are unaware of what you yourself typed? Inserting the word "read"?

My goodness. And then rather than admit that you did this, you try to imply something about me?
I’m surprised that anyone who calls themselves a believer in God woujd find fault with that.
Go look in the mirror and please open your eyes while doing so.
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
14,670
5,913
113
#26
Presently, church leaders have a financial interest to keep the people young and immature in their walk with the Lord.
Never thought of that but it sure seems about correct to me now that you said it that seems like a big issue .

i heard a guy explaining once a really popular preacher at the time he was explaining that “ if we as pastors and preachers don’t figure out a way to make the gospel sound appealing to people no one’s ever gonna want it “

He was explaining why he never talked about repentance or judgement or any conditions Jesus spoke of ect

i eas very sad as I listened to him just thinking ….if God sending and giving up his only begotten beloved and approved son to suffer and die for sinners , so they can repent and be forgiven and redeemed through believing the gospel

if this isn’t enough to present to people and make it “ attractive “ I don’t know what ever would be the same man rising up from death ?

The loss of doctrine in the present day worlds church is deeply sorrowful to my soul brother because we know where that leads from those examples written for us

it leads from here

“but I have chosen Jerusalem, that my name might be there; and have chosen David to be over my people Israel.”
‭‭2 Chronicles‬ ‭6:6‬ ‭KJV‬‬

“And unto his son will I give one tribe, that David my servant may have a light alway before me in Jerusalem, the city which I have chosen me to put my name there.”
‭‭1 Kings‬ ‭11:36‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Then as prophets began to speak of thier own hearts and thoughts

“Then shall they cry unto the LORD, but he will not hear them: he will even hide his face from them at that time, as they have behaved themselves ill in their doings. Thus saith the LORD concerning the prophets that make my people err, that bite with their teeth, and cry, Peace; and he that putteth not into their mouths, they even prepare war against him. But truly I am full of power by the spirit of the LORD, and of judgment, and of might, to declare unto Jacob his transgression, and to Israel his sin. Hear this, I pray you, ye heads of the house of Jacob, and princes of the house of Israel, that abhor judgment, and pervert all equity. They build up Zion with blood, and Jerusalem with iniquity. The heads thereof judge for reward, and the priests thereof teach for hire, and the prophets thereof divine for money: yet will they lean upon the LORD, and say, Is not the LORD among us? none evil can come upon us. Therefore shall Zion for your sake be plowed as a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps, and the mountain of the house as the high places of the forest.”
‭‭Micah‬ ‭3:4-5, 8-12‬ ‭KJV‬‬

and then we see the opposite as was first spoken as the result

“And the LORD said, I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel, and will cast off this city Jerusalem which I have chosen, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there.”
‭‭2 Kings‬ ‭23:27‬ ‭KJV‬‬

When God makes a covenant what he actually says in the covenant making the promises is the most important part of the covenant infact is the covenant word which the blood is then after she’s according to , for remission

were warned so much but so few ot seems Will listen

“But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

( notice this isn’t pre ordained they are bringing it on to themselves through embracing and spreading heresy that contends with the truth leading others onto shadow and away from light )


And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.”
‭‭2 Peter‬ ‭2:1-2‬ ‭KJV‬‬

the doctrine Jesus taught his believing disciples has really been lost from what’s taught , it remains as ever throughout the word ot and new but from what really gets preached and taught it seems it’s almost completely lost and replaced with every interpretation from man’s heart under the sun

so much that is a person reads a chapter and just accepts what’s being taught plainly and clearly lol tbey then somehow become extreme and a heretic because it disagrees with all the ideas and private interpretations tbey speak from thier own mind and heart like the prophets did in the ot and lead israel to its doom
 
May 15, 2019
695
230
43
#27
Agreed, so far.


Our salvation is by grace through faith. Our faith is demonstrated by our works. Our works add nothing to the fact of our salvation. If you think that works are required, you must exclude the infirm from salvation.


The context does not support the idea that baptism is salvific in the same way that belief in Christ is.


The context here is critical: Paul was encouraging an offering for a specific purpose outside the local congregation. Nothing in the text speaks to offerings for the support of local believers, of the local elders, or for the poor. There is nothing that says offerings may only be collected on the first day of the week; Paul was probably suggesting that once a week was convenient and easy to remember.

By the way, I agree on the error of tithing among Christians; it is of the old covenant and not of the new covenant in Christ's blood.


Agreed.


What this passage teaches (clearly, I might add!) is that the son is not to be punished for the sins of the father, nor vice-versa. It says nothing about the inheritance of the sin nature, which we do receive from Adam (see Romans 5:12).


Generally, it appears that you are treating every word of Scripture as though it is spoken to the Church corporately or Christians individually today. That is not the case. While God may bring any passage to the attention of one person for an individual purpose, much of the Bible is not "to" us today. It is for our instruction (general), not our direction (specific).

Further, you must consider the context of each word, phrase, sentence, verse, and passage. While we usually do this without extra effort, it is necessary to look at the historical, cultural, and theological contexts as well. We can't simply take a verse without any context and apply it to our lives (or attempt to impose our understanding on others) without that contextual consideration. Doing so has led to many errors, some very serious.
Agreed, so far.


Our salvation is by grace through faith. Our faith is demonstrated by our works. Our works add nothing to the fact of our salvation. If you think that works are required, you must exclude the infirm from salvation.


The context does not support the idea that baptism is salvific in the same way that belief in Christ is.


The context here is critical: Paul was encouraging an offering for a specific purpose outside the local congregation. Nothing in the text speaks to offerings for the support of local believers, of the local elders, or for the poor. There is nothing that says offerings may only be collected on the first day of the week; Paul was probably suggesting that once a week was convenient and easy to remember.

By the way, I agree on the error of tithing among Christians; it is of the old covenant and not of the new covenant in Christ's blood.


Agreed.


What this passage teaches (clearly, I might add!) is that the son is not to be punished for the sins of the father, nor vice-versa. It says nothing about the inheritance of the sin nature, which we do receive from Adam (see Romans 5:12).


Generally, it appears that you are treating every word of Scripture as though it is spoken to the Church corporately or Christians individually today. That is not the case. While God may bring any passage to the attention of one person for an individual purpose, much of the Bible is not "to" us today. It is for our instruction (general), not our direction (specific).

Further, you must consider the context of each word, phrase, sentence, verse, and passage. While we usually do this without extra effort, it is necessary to look at the historical, cultural, and theological contexts as well. We can't simply take a verse without any context and apply it to our lives (or attempt to impose our understanding on others) without that contextual consideration. Doing so has led to many errors, some very serious.


Your response reminds me of “cafeteria style religion” where you pick what you like and refuse what you don’t like—“I’ll have this, but I don’t want that.” Every scripture I gave is God’s word. 1 Corinthians 16 was written to the church at Corinth, and specifically mentions the churches of Galatia as well. And to all “saints.” This is definitely instruction for Christians. It was not meant to instruct HOW the money was spent or to whom it was given—that is addressed in other scriptures. This passage is authority from God for Christians to take up a collection on the first day of the week, which was when they met together Acts 20:7, and which is called the Lord’s day, because that was the day He was resurrected. It was a general collection EVERY WEEK. It was addressed to “churches” and to “saints.” God does not have to say—“Now don’t take up collections every time you come together” nor does He need to say “only” on the first day of the week. Have you ever heard of the law of elimination? It’s not just for religion it is for anything. It’s a law of logic. If your wife says “ Go to the store and buy bread and milk.” She is not required to say,” don’t buy, meat, don’t buy vegetables, don’t buy cookies, don’t buy ice cream etc, etc, etc, until she names off everything else in the store that she does not want you to buy. That’s ridiculous and unnecessary! When God said to take up a collection on the first day of the week he is not required to say—now don’t take up a collection on Monday, don’t take up a collection on Tuesday, don’t take up a collection in Wednesday, etc, etc. He stated when the collection was to be taken—that eliminates every other day.

When God told the Jews to “Remember the 7th day and keep it Holy”, I don’t know of one Jew who ever asked God, or Moses, or a priest—WHICH SABBATH DAY???? It’s common knowledge that every week has a 7th day. And common sense should tell you that when a 7th day comes around, you are to keep it holy. That is the way the Jews understood what God said. No one ever quibbled, “ but God did not say EVERY 7th day!
Do you see the parallel? Common sense should tell you that when God says take up a collection on the first day of the week, He dies not need to say EVERY first day of the week. It’s common knowledge that every week has a first day—so, every time a first day comes around, the saints in the churches of Christ take up a collection. Just as He instructed in 1 Cor. 16:1-2.

Here’s another example: In Genesis when God told Noah to build the ark out of gopher wood, did God need to say, “ Now don’t use Pine, or cypress, or oak, or cedar, or poplar, etc, etc, until he had eliminated every kind of wood there is??? No. When God specified the kind of wood He wanted, that eliminated every other kind of wood. You may think that if Noah had ignored what God said and used a different kind of wood, it wouldn’t have mattered—the ark would have floated anyway; but I personally have my doubts.

Naaman in 2 Kings woujd not have been cured of his leprosy if he had not obeyed what God said to do and wash in the Jordan River. Would just ANY river work? I don’t think so.

Nadab and Abihu were killed in Leviticus 10 because they did not use the exact “fire” that God commanded.

Peter says “If anyone speaks, let him speak as the oracles of God.” ( 1 Peter 4:11)

Colossians 3:17 “And whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord….” That means by His authority. When someone says “Stop, in the name of the law!” That means by thecAUTHORITY of the law. And Jesus says He has ALL AUTHORITY in heaven AND ON EARTH!! Matt. 28:18-19.

It’s all about respecting what God has said and doing it HIS WAY and not our way.
It’s all about trying to please God and not ourselves. I will address other issues in another post. Trying to keep this post from becoming too long.
 
May 15, 2019
695
230
43
#28
Really? You are unaware of what you yourself typed? Inserting the word "read"?

My goodness. And then rather than admit that you did this, you try to imply something about me?
Go look in the mirror and please open your eyes while doing so.
So you are finding fault with my post just because after I quoted what Jesus said exactly in John 12:47-48, I inserted a parentheses with the word “read” right beside the original word “ hears” to show that it would apply to people who either hear literally or read the words of Christ??? Is that all you’ve got? You are grasping at straws.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,191
30,326
113
#29
So you are finding fault with my post just because after I quoted what Jesus said exactly in John 12:47-48, I inserted a parentheses with the word “read” right beside the original word “ hears” to show that it would apply to people who either hear literally or read the words of Christ??? Is that all you’ve got? You are grasping at straws.
You say accept what God says, but then change it? That is not me grasping at straws.

Perhaps you ought to follow your own advice, but you do not.

Many believe in their own ideas, or “feelings” OVER what God has said in the Bible.
Our punishment for not believing what God has said may not be PHYSICAL death as it was for that officer
of the King in 2 Kings 7, but even worse, it will be SPIRITUAL death and eternal separation from God.
 
May 15, 2019
695
230
43
#30
Agreed, so far.


Our salvation is by grace through faith. Our faith is demonstrated by our works. Our works add nothing to the fact of our salvation. If you think that works are required, you must exclude the infirm from salvation.


The context does not support the idea that baptism is salvific in the same way that belief in Christ is.


The context here is critical: Paul was encouraging an offering for a specific purpose outside the local congregation. Nothing in the text speaks to offerings for the support of local believers, of the local elders, or for the poor. There is nothing that says offerings may only be collected on the first day of the week; Paul was probably suggesting that once a week was convenient and easy to remember.

By the way, I agree on the error of tithing among Christians; it is of the old covenant and not of the new covenant in Christ's blood.


Agreed.


What this passage teaches (clearly, I might add!) is that the son is not to be punished for the sins of the father, nor vice-versa. It says nothing about the inheritance of the sin nature, which we do receive from Adam (see Romans 5:12).


Generally, it appears that you are treating every word of Scripture as though it is spoken to the Church corporately or Christians individually today. That is not the case. While God may bring any passage to the attention of one person for an individual purpose, much of the Bible is not "to" us today. It is for our instruction (general), not our direction (specific).

Further, you must consider the context of each word, phrase, sentence, verse, and passage. While we usually do this without extra effort, it is necessary to look at the historical, cultural, and theological contexts as well. We can't simply take a verse without any context and apply it to our lives (or attempt to impose our understanding on others) without that contextual consideration. Doing so has led to many errors, some very serious.


Addressing your comments on James 2:24–not by faith only: you said “our works have nothing to do with our salvation”, but James 2 says something entirely different. 1) verse 14, James asks a rhetorical question—If a man has faith but does not have works, “Can faith save him?” He is asking if faith without works can save a person and the answer from this text is NO! That doesn’t sound like he is saying that “works have nothing to do with salvation. Do you believe what he says in verse 14- that you can’t be saved by faith without works? I don’t think you believe what it says and yet it was written by the Holy Spirit. 2) look at verse 17. God says “Faith, by itself, if it does not have works is DEAD,” Do you believe these words of God—the Holy Spirit? Not if you believe that “works have nothing to do with our salvation. Those two ideas are directly OPPOSITE to one another. 3) Look at verse 20–“Do you not know oh foolish man that works without faith is dead?” Can we be saved by a “dead” faith. James says No! But you say “works have nothing to do with our being saved”. You and the Holy Spirit are not in agreement. You are saying something entirely different from what He is arguing. Who do you think is wrong? 4) Read verse 21- “Abraham was JUSTIFIED by works.” To be justified means to be saved. So Abraham was SAVED by works. But you don’t believe this. 5) now read verse 24-“ You see then, that a man is JUSTIFIED (saved) by works and NOT BY FAITH ALONE.” But you don’t believe God when He says this. 6) Read verse 25- “…Rahab the harlot was JUSTIFIED (saved) by works.” But you do not believe what God says here. 7) one last verse—verse 27- “For as the body without the Spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead, also.” It is not difficult at all to understand what the Spirit of God is saying here. He repeats it at least 7 times. How can you miss it? Only if you “want” to miss it. You either believe what God says or you don’t. Remember John 12:47-48.
 
May 15, 2019
695
230
43
#31
You say accept what God says, but then change it? That is not me grasping at straws.

Perhaps you ought to follow your own advice, but you do not.
If you read carefully, you will see that I did not change any word of God in John 13:47-48. I quoted it exactly as God said it—using the word “hears” as it is in the passage. That is not changing it or leaving it out. It’s there—just like He said it. I put in a parentheses to include reading along with hearing. It did not change the message of the Holy Spirit at all—the point of the verse is that we all must believe what God has said. If it bothers you that much then for goodness sake just leave it out! The message will be the same.

This is just a “quibble”. You know it and I know it. The point is do you believe what God says in the scriptures I gave— like 1 Peter 3:21, James 2:24, Ezekiel 18, Exodus 32:33, and the others. We both know you do NOT believe what God says in those scriptures. You are one of the people like the man in the story in 2 Kings— you don’t believe many things that God says in the Bible.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,623
13,867
113
#32
Your response reminds me of “cafeteria style religion” where you pick what you like and refuse what you don’t like—“I’ll have this, but I don’t want that.” Every scripture I gave is God’s word.
Uh huh. Have you built an ark? Do you stone adulterers? Do you sacrifice bulls? Do you attend the Temple in Jerusalem three times each year? Do you go to Macedonia to preach the gospel? Do you lie on your left side for 390 days and then roll over to your right side for a further 40 days? All of these are instruction given in Scripture. Since your answer is "No" to every question, you are just as guilty of "cafeteria style religion" as the next person. Don't be a hypocrite. Context matters!

1 Corinthians 16 was written to the church at Corinth, and specifically mentions the churches of Galatia as well. And to all “saints.” This is definitely instruction for Christians. It was not meant to instruct HOW the money was spent or to whom it was given—that is addressed in other scriptures.
Um, yes it is. See below.

This passage is authority from God for Christians to take up a collection on the first day of the week, which was when they met together Acts 20:7, and which is called the Lord’s day, because that was the day He was resurrected. It was a general collection EVERY WEEK. It was addressed to “churches” and to “saints.” God does not have to say—“Now don’t take up collections every time you come together” nor does He need to say “only” on the first day of the week.
Here's the whole passage proving your error:

Now about the collection for the Lord’s people: Do what I told the Galatian churches to do. 2 On the first day of every week, each one of you should set aside a sum of money in keeping with your income, saving it up, so that when I come no collections will have to be made. 3 Then, when I arrive, I will give letters of introduction to the men you approve and send them with your gift to Jerusalem.

Context refutes your claim completely. Paul was CLEARLY instructing the collection of funds for a specific external need, and NOT for the local congregation.

Have you ever heard of the law of elimination? It’s not just for religion it is for anything. It’s a law of logic. If your wife says “ Go to the store and buy bread and milk.” She is not required to say,” don’t buy, meat, don’t buy vegetables, don’t buy cookies, don’t buy ice cream etc, etc, etc, until she names off everything else in the store that she does not want you to buy. That’s ridiculous and unnecessary! When God said to take up a collection on the first day of the week he is not required to say—now don’t take up a collection on Monday, don’t take up a collection on Tuesday, don’t take up a collection in Wednesday, etc, etc. He stated when the collection was to be taken—that eliminates every other day.
No, it doesn't. You need to apply the law of logic where appropriate, and not where it isn't. Further, since your claim regarding the collection is flawed, your reasoning here is flawed too.

When God told the Jews to “Remember the 7th day and keep it Holy”, I don’t know of one Jew who ever asked God, or Moses, or a priest—WHICH SABBATH DAY???? It’s common knowledge that every week has a 7th day. And common sense should tell you that when a 7th day comes around, you are to keep it holy. That is the way the Jews understood what God said. No one ever quibbled, “ but God did not say EVERY 7th day!
God didn't need to say "every seventh day" because that is implied in "Sabbath" which already occurred every seventh day.

It’s all about respecting what God has said and doing it HIS WAY and not our way. It’s all about trying to please God and not ourselves.
So don't ignore what He said in His word about the collection on the first day of the week being for the saints in Jerusalem! ;)
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,623
13,867
113
#33
Addressing your comments on James 2:24–not by faith only: you said “our works have nothing to do with our salvation”, but James 2 says something entirely different. 1) verse 14, James asks a rhetorical question—If a man has faith but does not have works, “Can faith save him?” He is asking if faith without works can save a person and the answer from this text is NO! That doesn’t sound like he is saying that “works have nothing to do with salvation. Do you believe what he says in verse 14- that you can’t be saved by faith without works? I don’t think you believe what it says and yet it was written by the Holy Spirit. 2) look at verse 17. God says “Faith, by itself, if it does not have works is DEAD,” Do you believe these words of God—the Holy Spirit? Not if you believe that “works have nothing to do with our salvation. Those two ideas are directly OPPOSITE to one another. 3) Look at verse 20–“Do you not know oh foolish man that works without faith is dead?” Can we be saved by a “dead” faith. James says No! But you say “works have nothing to do with our being saved”. You and the Holy Spirit are not in agreement. You are saying something entirely different from what He is arguing. Who do you think is wrong? 4) Read verse 21- “Abraham was JUSTIFIED by works.” To be justified means to be saved. So Abraham was SAVED by works. But you don’t believe this. 5) now read verse 24-“ You see then, that a man is JUSTIFIED (saved) by works and NOT BY FAITH ALONE.” But you don’t believe God when He says this. 6) Read verse 25- “…Rahab the harlot was JUSTIFIED (saved) by works.” But you do not believe what God says here. 7) one last verse—verse 27- “For as the body without the Spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead, also.” It is not difficult at all to understand what the Spirit of God is saying here. He repeats it at least 7 times. How can you miss it? Only if you “want” to miss it. You either believe what God says or you don’t. Remember John 12:47-48.
We are saved by faith, not by works. If the faith we claim is not demonstrated by works, it is not genuine faith. The works demonstrate the faith that has saved us. I'm sorry you have such difficulty with this. I'm not interested in your "but you don't believe" accusations and am not going to argue about this.
 
May 15, 2019
695
230
43
#34
Uh huh. Have you built an ark? Do you stone adulterers? Do you sacrifice bulls? Do you attend the Temple in Jerusalem three times each year? Do you go to Macedonia to preach the gospel? Do you lie on your left side for 390 days and then roll over to your right side for a further 40 days? All of these are instruction given in Scripture. Since your answer is "No" to every question, you are just as guilty of "cafeteria style religion" as the next person. Don't be a hypocrite. Context matters!


Um, yes it is. See below.


Here's the whole passage proving your error:

Now about the collection for the Lord’s people: Do what I told the Galatian churches to do. 2 On the first day of every week, each one of you should set aside a sum of money in keeping with your income, saving it up, so that when I come no collections will have to be made. 3 Then, when I arrive, I will give letters of introduction to the men you approve and send them with your gift to Jerusalem.

Context refutes your claim completely. Paul was CLEARLY instructing the collection of funds for a specific external need, and NOT for the local congregation.


No, it doesn't. You need to apply the law of logic where appropriate, and not where it isn't. Further, since your claim regarding the collection is flawed, your reasoning here is flawed too.


God didn't need to say "every seventh day" because that is implied in "Sabbath" which already occurred every seventh day.


So don't ignore what He said in His word about the collection on the first day of the week being for the saints in Jerusalem! ;)[/QUOTE


I am fully aware that this money was going to help the poor saints in Jerusalem. But there are other scriptures that tell of churches in other places helping other saints. Like Romans 15:25-26. The saints in Rome were making a contribution to the poor in Jerusalem also. How did they know to do this? Who told them to do this? 2 Corinthians 9:1 Paul talks about the work of “ministering to the needs of the saints.” That is a general command to all needy saints every where not just in Jerusalem. In verse 13 Paul commends them for their “liberal sharing with them and ALL MEN.” Where did these funds come from?
If there was a collection taken up every first day of the week, it surely wasnt all going to the saints in Jerusalem. Or do you still believe it was a one time collection? Paul told the “saints in Rome to distribute to the needs of the saints. Where did they get the I money to do this work? Paul talks to the saints in Corinth and tells them to help the saints in Macedonia who are in deep poverty(verse 1-2). And the church in Macedonia was to help the saints in Corinth, verse 13-14 so that there would be “equality.” In another place Paul says those who preach the gospel should “live” of the gospel and he reports that churches supported him financially so he could do this. He took “wages” of the churches. Where did the churches in all of the places mentioned get the funds to minister to needy saints in different places and pay preachers like Paul a salary to preach?? Paul makes the statement in 1 Corinthians—the same book where he tells the churches to take up a collection on the first day of the week—that the things he is telling them are the commandments of God 14:37 and that he taught the SAME THING IN ALL THE CHURCHES. (4:17, 7:17). What Paul said in 16:1-2 was for ALL THE CHURCHES—not just the church at Corinth. This is how Macedonia knew to minister to the needy saints in Jerusalem and to Corinth. And anywhere there are saints who need help. This is how the churches knew to pay salaries to preachers preaching the gospel. And the command in 16:1-2 is how they gathered the funds to do the work. It was not a one-time collection and it was to be observed everytime there was a first day of the week. This is how the church gets its funds. And I might add—it’s NOT by selling chicken dinners and Boston Butts!
 
Nov 14, 2024
577
363
63
#35
I agree with all you have said. You are right that I would probably have more success with people who are not already indoctrinated with false doctrine, but there is much scripture that tells Christians to warn and rebuke false teaching. It’s not the people who believe these false doctrines, that I am fighting—it’s the error that is being promoted by Satan.
In theory, we fight against the lies being promoted by Satan, but, in practice, it inevitably leads to fighting with the people who believe and embrace such lies as well. In other words, whenever you encounter someone who has been inoculated with a false gospel message because someone injected them with something like "Just say this sinner's prayer, and you are once saved, always saved," thereby making them immune to much of God's word, they are never going to progress in their alleged Christian walk (more like a deep sleep from which they have no desire to wake), and they are going to fight against everything that you say that promotes any true growth in the Lord. That is just the way that it is. Rather than get sucked into such fights, just do what God has called Christians to do, and leave the rest up to him. In my way of thinking, and it is biblically-based, there are three "S's" which are in play here, and we, as Christians, only have control over two of them. The three "S's" would be as follows.

Sower
Seed
Soil

You, as the Sower of God's word, need to make sure that your own life is in order or in accordance to God's word. This "S" you can control.

When it comes to the Seed of God's word, you need to make sure what you are saying truly aligns with God's rightly divided word. This "S" you also can control.

When it comes to the Soil or to your audience, you have absolutely no control over their free will choices, and only God can give the increase.

Make sure that your own life is in order, and make sure that what you are telling others is indeed the truth, and then the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of truth, will strive with your hearers. Whether or not they listen to him is entirely on them, and not on you, so never try to force an increase. When you recognize that people are not going to hear by their own free will choices, then just move on to other people, and don't spin your wheels with those who are never going to listen. That is my advice, and it is biblically-based advice.

Oh, and don't forget how God has graciously provided us with the ignore option here. In other words, you are always going to encounter gate-keepers (those who set themselves to stop any actual biblical truth from being shared), trolls, bullies, etc. on forums, so just ignore them and try to reach others. I already have several people here on ignore myself.
I would love to also converse with those who are lost. Do you know of a chat site that is made up of unbelievers? That would be awesome.
I don't personally know of any such chat sites, but pretty much the whole world is lost, so perhaps chat sites aren't necessary. In other words, the whole world is pretty much a potential harvest field.

For me, I doubt that I will spin my own wheels here much longer. I have tried to reach out to newbies time and time again in my short stint here, and nobody has accepted my gracious offers to help them. I have also spent considerable time in the prayer requests section, and I have truly prayed for quite a number of people here. I believe that God hears my prayers, so hopefully something positive has come out of those efforts on my part. And then there is the Bible Discussion Forum a.k.a. the lesson in futility. In other words, in the few conversations I have been a part of, and in the many conversations that I have read without bothering to engage myself in any of them, nobody seems to ever change their beliefs even a smidgen, so what is all the effort ultimately worth? Nothing, seemingly. That said, even if my participation here wanes, and it already has, and I expect that it will continue to do so, then I still intend to keep my account here in the hope that I might be able to at least positively affect one person somewhere down the line. At the same time, I do fully plan to set the bulk of my attention on others outside of this forum...not that they are any easier to reach.
 
Nov 1, 2024
1,227
388
83
#36
In other words, in the few conversations I have been a part of, and in the many conversations that I have read without bothering to engage myself in any of them, nobody seems to ever change their beliefs even a smidgen, so what is all the effort ultimately worth?
Self learning. I learn a lot from other peoples' errors and having to formulate what I believe into clear language so I can be more confident that what I believe is actually the truth. So it's mainly for me. Whoever else benefits is in God's hands and not my concern. My concern is to be as faithful as possible to the revelation God has given me and sow those insights as opportunity arises. I think too many people are trying to convince others rather than convince their own minds and hearts that they're walking the straight path
 
Nov 14, 2024
577
363
63
#37
Self learning. I learn a lot from other peoples' errors and having to formulate what I believe into clear language so I can be more confident that what I believe is actually the truth. So it's mainly for me. Whoever else benefits is in God's hands and not my concern. My concern is to be as faithful as possible to the revelation God has given me and sow those insights as opportunity arises. I think too many people are trying to convince others rather than convince their own minds and hearts that they're walking the straight path
Is there truth to what you said? Sure, there is, but my own confidence is found in God's word itself, and it is not really reliant at all upon the erroneous beliefs of others. As I said in a recent post, I honestly know what most people here are going to say before they even say it. Why? Am I omniscient? Am I a prophet? No, and no. It's just that I've heard it all so many, many times before. In other words, I am quite familiar with the false gospel messages which are out there, and I know how the adherents of the same will inevitably behave.
 
Nov 14, 2024
577
363
63
#38
Oh, and don't forget how God has graciously provided us with the ignore option here. In other words, you are always going to encounter gate-keepers (those who set themselves to stop any actual biblical truth from being shared), trolls, bullies, etc. on forums, so just ignore them and try to reach others. I already have several people here on ignore myself.
@Beckworth

In my earlier response, I forgot to specifically mention "gnat strainers." You know, those who will comb through your posts while seeking to find the smallest thing imaginable that they can argue against, and while simultaneously swallowing a camel by ignoring everything that you actually intended to say. Do yourself a favor, and just put them on ignore. It will help you to stay focused upon those who might actually consider anything that you have to say.
 
Oct 24, 2012
16,745
558
113
#39
We are saved by faith, not by works. If the faith we claim is not demonstrated by works, it is not genuine faith.
And the works revealed are not mine, it is God's done work, working through us onto the crowd, the same as when pentecost took place it was not the disciples speaking it was God through them without any rituals first as man continues to have to do first, even when Peter spoke to Cornelius's house of Gentiles in act 9, 10
God loves us for all time to repent (Chang mind) believe God and be new in the same love and mercy given first, wow, thank you Lord
Then the new comes in and is in and one does not have t defend anything. One is freed in love and mercy to all, amazing grace it is. To me at least after another long walk off a short pier
 
Jun 30, 2015
25,623
13,867
113
#40
I am fully aware that this money was going to help the poor saints in Jerusalem. But there are other scriptures that tell of churches in other places helping other saints. Like Romans 15:25-26. The saints in Rome were making a contribution to the poor in Jerusalem also. How did they know to do this? Who told them to do this? 2 Corinthians 9:1 Paul talks about the work of “ministering to the needs of the saints.” That is a general command to all needy saints every where not just in Jerusalem. In verse 13 Paul commends them for their “liberal sharing with them and ALL MEN.” Where did these funds come from?
If there was a collection taken up every first day of the week, it surely wasnt all going to the saints in Jerusalem. Or do you still believe it was a one time collection? Paul told the “saints in Rome to distribute to the needs of the saints. Where did they get the I money to do this work? Paul talks to the saints in Corinth and tells them to help the saints in Macedonia who are in deep poverty(verse 1-2). And the church in Macedonia was to help the saints in Corinth, verse 13-14 so that there would be “equality.” In another place Paul says those who preach the gospel should “live” of the gospel and he reports that churches supported him financially so he could do this. He took “wages” of the churches. Where did the churches in all of the places mentioned get the funds to minister to needy saints in different places and pay preachers like Paul a salary to preach?? Paul makes the statement in 1 Corinthians—the same book where he tells the churches to take up a collection on the first day of the week—that the things he is telling them are the commandments of God 14:37 and that he taught the SAME THING IN ALL THE CHURCHES. (4:17, 7:17). What Paul said in 16:1-2 was for ALL THE CHURCHES—not just the church at Corinth. This is how Macedonia knew to minister to the needy saints in Jerusalem and to Corinth. And anywhere there are saints who need help. This is how the churches knew to pay salaries to preachers preaching the gospel. And the command in 16:1-2 is how they gathered the funds to do the work. It was not a one-time collection and it was to be observed everytime there was a first day of the week. This is how the church gets its funds.
Your earlier post implied that it is wrong for congregational leaders to invite an offering every time the church gathered, rather than just one day a week. The verse you posted is from 1 Corinthians 16, and its context clearly shows that offering was for the saints in Jerusalem, refuting your claim. So what exactly is your concern? There's no point in long threads restating matters on which we agree.