Dietary laws, do you keep them?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,975
13,626
113
The Jerusalem Council was debating whether salvation was by circumcision or by grace, but were not debating whether followers of God should follow His commands in accordance with the example that Christ set for us to follow. In Matthew 4:15-23, Christ began his ministry with the Gospel message to repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand, which was a light to the Gentiles, and the Torah was how his audience knew what sin is (Romans 3:20), so repenting from our disobedience to it is a central part of the Gospel of the Kingdom, which was the main them of his ministry. Christ also set a sinless example for us to follow of how to walk in obedience to the Torah and as his followers we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked (1 John 2:6). So Christ spent his ministry teaching his followers to obey the Torah by word and by example and it is not an imposition to hold the position that followers of Christ should follow Christ.
they literally wrote a letter saying they heard some people had been telling the Gentile Christians they must keep the Law, but that they & the Holy Spirit thought it good not to lay any such burden on them.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,975
13,626
113
they literally wrote a letter saying they heard some people had been telling the Gentile Christians they must keep the Law, but that they & the Holy Spirit thought it good not to lay any such burden on them.
does this mean we don't do righteousness?

of course not.

but righteousness isn't by the Law, it is also written - that if it were, there is no need for Christ, and He died for nothing.
 

Soyeong

Active member
Oct 11, 2023
869
106
43
they literally wrote a letter saying they heard some people had been telling the Gentile Christians they must keep the Law, but that they & the Holy Spirit thought it good not to lay any such burden on them.
It is contradictory for someone to treat Acts 15:19-21 as containing an exhaustive list for mature Gentile believers in order to limit which laws Gentiles should follow while also treating it as being a non-exhaustive list by saying that that there are obviously other laws that Gentiles should follow, such as the greatest two commandments, or those things spoken against in verses like Romans 1:26-31, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, Galatians 5:19-21, and Titus 3:1-3. In Acts 15:19-21, it was not given as an exhaustive list for mature believers, but rather it was given as a listen intended to avoid making things too difficult for new believers, which they excused in verse 21 with the expectation that Gentiles would continue to learn about how to obey Moses by hearing him taught every Sabbath in the synagogues.

Moreover, everything commanded in the Torah is either in regard to how to love God or our neighbor, which is why Jesus said in Matthew 22:36-40 that those are the greatest two commandments and that all of the other commandments hang on them, so the position that Gentiles should obey the greatest two commandments is also the position that Gentiles should obey all of the commandments that hang on them. For example, if we love God and our neighbor, then we won't commit murder, idolatry, adultery, theft, favoritism, rape, kidnapping, and so forth for the rest of the Torah.
 

TMS

Senior Member
Mar 21, 2015
4,044
1,325
113
Australia
Do you believe in sanctification?

Justification is parted righteousness and we agree on this. But do you believe in sanctification?

1Th 4:3-4
3 For this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication: 4 That every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honour;
Joh 17:17-19
17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. 18 As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world. 19 And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth.

Psa 119:142 Thy righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and thy law is the truth.
 

Soyeong

Active member
Oct 11, 2023
869
106
43
does this mean we don't do righteousness?

of course not.

but righteousness isn't by the Law, it is also written - that if it were, there is no need for Christ, and He died for nothing.
Character traits are not something that are earned as the result of our works, but rather the only way for someone to attain a character trait is by believing that they ought to be a doer of that trait. For example, there is no amount of courageous works that someone is required to have done first in order to earn becoming courageous as the result, but rather the only way to become courageous is through faith, and someone becoming courageous means that they are becoming a doer of courageous works. The same is true for becoming righteous and every other character trait. God's law is His instructions for how to be a doer of righteous works, not for how to become righteous, but someone becoming righteous through faith means that they are becoming a doer of righteous works through faith. This is why the same faith by which we are declared righteous apart from works does not abolish our need to be a doer of righteous works in obedience to God's law, but rather our faith upholds it (Romans 3:27-31).
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,467
542
113
there's a treasure to be found here, in discussions of iconoclasm. :)

why was it the command of God that the temple be decorated with engraved images of angels, palm trees, and open flowers?

what do angels look like, as described in the scripture?

:coffee::unsure:

And, Paul had one of his disciples circumcised before traveling, and refused on another occasion for another disciple...
 

TMS

Senior Member
Mar 21, 2015
4,044
1,325
113
Australia
does this mean we don't do righteousness?

of course not.

but righteousness isn't by the Law, it is also written - that if it were, there is no need for Christ, and He died for nothing.
We can not say that we have obeyed the law. We can not stand justified without Jesus as our advocate.
Perfect righteousness is given to us as a gift from Jesus. We can not work for it or gain it by our efforts.

If we could we would not need Jesus.

The standard does not change.
Perfect righteousness is being free from sin, which means perfectly obeying the law.

Righteousness is not by the law for us because we all fail. We are told to obey because we love Jesus.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
3,467
542
113
does this mean we don't do righteousness?

of course not.

but righteousness isn't by the Law, it is also written - that if it were, there is no need for Christ, and He died for nothing.

Doing righteousness is manifested only one way....

And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate the Lord’s glory,
are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory,
which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit."
2 Corinthians 3:18

Now?

“For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.
“As the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts."

Isaiah 55:8-9



So, if His ways are not our ways?
And, His thoughts are not our thoughts?

If we refuse to accept anything other than sound doctrine?
Sound doctrine to transform our mind?

Being transformed, then our expression in life we will be manifesting His righteousness.
Because the transformation we received when the Spirit is manifested in us.
Transformed into His ways and His thoughts by means of sound doctrine!

“For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.

That is why choosing for a subjective preference (false doctrine) in what we choose to believe?
May gain us some approval from likeminded believers. But, in God's eyes? We remain losers.

Being transformed must be by sound doctrine.
Afterwards?
It will require no conscious effort on our part to be expressing Christ in our ambassadorship.
No more conscious effort than we need to think about what we are doing when tying our shoe laces.

grace and peace ................
 

Soyeong

Active member
Oct 11, 2023
869
106
43
Doing righteousness is manifested only one way....

And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate the Lord’s glory,
are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory,
which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit."
2 Corinthians 3:18

Now?

“For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.
“As the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts."

Isaiah 55:8-9



So, if His ways are not our ways?
And, His thoughts are not our thoughts?

If we refuse to accept anything other than sound doctrine?
Sound doctrine to transform our mind?

Being transformed, then our expression in life we will be manifesting His righteousness.
Because the transformation we received when the Spirit is manifested in us.
Transformed into His ways and His thoughts by means of sound doctrine!

“For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.

That is why choosing for a subjective preference (false doctrine) in what we choose to believe?
May gain us some approval from likeminded believers. But, in God's eyes? We remain losers.

Being transformed must be by sound doctrine.
Afterwards?
It will require no conscious effort on our part to be expressing Christ in our ambassadorship.
No more conscious effort than we need to think about what we are doing when tying our shoe laces.

grace and peace ................
Do you affirm or deny that followers of God should walk in His way?
 

TMS

Senior Member
Mar 21, 2015
4,044
1,325
113
Australia
Rom 6:12 Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.

Define sin.

God has given us a physical, mental and spiritual body. We need to look after all aspects.

Joh 2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body.
1Co 6:19-20
19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? 20 For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.

If you are destroying the body you are not glorifying God.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,614
13,863
113
Jesus was perfectly righteous and all His works were perfectly righteous.

He perfectly obeyed the law, and never sinned so was righteous.
You have the cart before the horse, making righteousness attainable through obedience, but Scripture tells us that righteousness cannot be gained through the Law.

Jesus was righteous at conception and birth as well as at His death. His obedience to the Law is the consequence, not the cause.
 

TMS

Senior Member
Mar 21, 2015
4,044
1,325
113
Australia
You have the cart before the horse, making righteousness attainable through obedience, but Scripture tells us that righteousness cannot be gained through the Law.

Jesus was righteous at conception and birth as well as at His death. His obedience to the Law is the consequence, not the cause.
When Adam and Eve were walking in God's presence, they had no sin.
Sin seperated them and also seperates us from God.

What is righteousness?
The dictionary states....
"the quality of being morally right or justifiable."
" acting in accord with divine or moral law, free from guilt or sin"

Righteousness = free from sin. Being right.

A righteous person does not sin. Jesus was righteous.
Righteousness and not sinning go hand in hand. Like faith and works.

Perfect righteousness is not possible for us to attain by our own efforts. We can not gain it ourself. But Christ gifts it to us by faith.

Phi 3:9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:

Rom 2:26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,407
1,007
113
If a gentile steals or murders is that a sin?
Yes, a Gentile has sinned but the Gentile was never taught the law.

Rome and Corinth were ignorant of the Jewish law and so was Pilate.

For some strange reason you are of the opinion that the Mosaic law was known
by everyone?

If a gentile takes God's name in vain, is that a sin?
The Gentiles never knew God.

The Jews knew who God was.

Paul clearly tells you that the Gentiles did not know God, the law, the covenants, etc.

Ephesians 2:12
Remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, excluded from the people of Israel,
and strangers to the covenants of the promise, having no hope and without God in the world.

How can you say that the Gentiles knew the Mosaic law?

"strangers to the covenants of the promise, having no hope and without God in the world"

If the Gentiles never knew God then how can they take God's name in vain?

I struggle to understand why you contradict Paul on so many points.

You do not need to be a Jew to know that you are guilty of sin.
Correct, but the Gentiles never knew the law.

Even today, it would be a very rare person who could recite the 613 laws.

The bulk of humanity would not even know the ten commandments.

I can assure you that in the first century that the Gentile nations did not know
the ten commandments. Or any other commandment in the law.

Some laws were given to Israel as a nation, but the moral laws are given
all people from the start.
There is no evidence for that in the scripture.

You need the evidence from the text to support that claim.

Sin and the laws that define sin were present from Adam until today.
There is no evidence to support that claim.

Jesus did not lower the standard, we are not free to sin.
Jesus gave us the Holy Spirit and by the power of the Holy Spirit we live.

No Christian is under the law.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,407
1,007
113
When Adam and Eve were walking in God's presence, they had no sin.
Sin seperated them and also seperates us from God.

What is righteousness?
The dictionary states....
"the quality of being morally right or justifiable."
" acting in accord with divine or moral law, free from guilt or sin"

Righteousness = free from sin. Being right.

A righteous person does not sin. Jesus was righteous.
Righteousness and not sinning go hand in hand. Like faith and works.

Perfect righteousness is not possible for us to attain by our own efforts. We can not gain it ourself. But Christ gifts it to us by faith.

Phi 3:9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:

Rom 2:26 Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
We were separated from God, yes.

Nothing we can do about that.

Jesus Christ had to give His life so we could receive life.

We don't play a single card in this, the full glory belongs to Jesus Christ.

All the law will do is condemn you.

The law is the ministry of death.

We live by that trust, that faith in Jesus Christ, His righteousness and not our own.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,407
1,007
113
The Jerusalem Council was debating whether salvation was by circumcision or by grace, but were not debating whether followers of God should follow His commands in accordance with the example that Christ set for us to follow.
Your reply was incorrect Soyeong.

Here is what the council on Jerusalem was discussing.

Acts 15:5
But some of the sect of the Pharisees who had believed stood up, saying,
It is necessary to circumcise them and to direct them to keep the Law of Moses.”

The Jerusalem council was not really talking about circumcision as such.

The Jerusalem council was discussing whether Gentiles would need to be
under the law. Circumcision is the entry requirement for admission to the
Mosaic law.

Did a Gentile need to become a Jew like Jesus was and under the law?

Unfortunately for the legalists the council just said that Gentiles needed
to avoid sexual immorality. If they did that, abstain from sexual immorality,
then they would do well.

Acts 15 is a simple text.

No interpretation needed.
 

Inquisitor

Well-known member
Mar 17, 2022
3,407
1,007
113
The issue of whether followers of God should follow God's commands in accordance with the example that Christ set for us to follow is not a tribal matter, but rather it is a foundational issue.


If you believe that the whole Bible is true, then you should seek to interpret 2 Corinthians 3 in a way that is in accordance with what other verses say on the matter rather than a way that is contrary to them.
There you go Soyeong, you just admitted that you cannot accept what 2 Corinthians 3,
says at face value.

The lengths you go to to alter the simple reading of the text.

You must distort every verse you read to conform those verses to the law.

2 Corinthians 3:3
Who also made us adequate as servants of a new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit;
for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.

A very simple verse indeed.

The letter kills.

What is the letter?

The letter of the law!

Can it get any easier?

Christians are not under the law.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,975
13,626
113
It is contradictory for someone to treat Acts 15:19-21 as containing an exhaustive list for mature Gentile believers in order to limit which laws Gentiles should follow while also treating it as being a non-exhaustive list by saying that that there are obviously other laws that Gentiles should follow, such as the greatest two
it is contradictory to be saved by grace through faith in the work of Christ and to then make a list of things which believers "must do" for salvation.

hence Galatians 3
 

TMS

Senior Member
Mar 21, 2015
4,044
1,325
113
Australia
Christians are not under the law.
So can I freely murder, and ignore the law?
Am I by grace able to make void the law?

Should we make void the law because of the grace that is purchased with Jesus's blood.

Jesus died because the law was not able to be changed.
 

JohnDB

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2021
6,281
2,561
113
Righteous works of the Law (such as dietary restrictions, circumcision, or worship on particular days) at first glance seem to have wisdom and an aura of pleasing God by performing them.

And these things are addictive while subtlety convincing you of your own self righteousness.

However....they are actually taking you further from your goal of fellowship with Jesus. Because that's the ultimate goal we wish to obtain.

Fellowship with Jesus can only be obtained with humility by exercises of agape love and faith towards God and your neighbor. (Which is what the law focused on in another time in history)

So....eat a bacon cheeseburger without guilt....wash it down with a beer and smile....be ready to give an answer for that sort of faith. One that has extreme confidence in what God has said He will do to those who love him and your neighbor.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,614
13,863
113
Perfect righteousness is not possible for us to attain by our own efforts. We can not gain it ourself. But Christ gifts it to us by faith.

Phi 3:9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:
So why do you counsel people to follow the law, when you clearly know that following the law does not bring about righteousness? Why, when you know that righteousness is a gift from God by faith, do you tell people to attempt to be righteous by following the law?

Have you not read Galatians 3:2-3?

"Did you receive the Spirit by observing the Law, or by believing what you heard? Are you so foolish? After beginning with the Spirit, are you now trying to attain your goal by human effort? "