The hatred of Jews

That article is nonsense... proven by merely reading it.

It does not supply one shred of evidence:
A.) Big claims, but with no evidence whatsoever.
B.) 2 anonymous sources, with no names, and no way to identify them or prove they even exist.
C.) Sleight of hand: Lots of genuine legal violations are mentioned, but these are for... accusations that are never proven.

Nowhere in this article is one bit of PROOF of ANYTHING WHATSOEVER.
It is, essentially, just an angry screed, and a lot of unproven claims.


BTW...
I don't need to discredit this news source... the article itself is just a lot of claims without evidence.
Whether or not the news source is pro hamas, we can be certain this particular article is nonsense by merely READING IT.
.

Israel offered them a two state solution (complete sovereignty) and they rejected it many times; Israel offered to place it under full jurisdiction of their neighbors in Egypt, and Egypt didn't want it. Gaza is like a thorn you can't get rid of. It won't go away, nobody will take it, and it can't be reasoned with. Please remember, there is not one Arab country that even wants refugees from Gaza. Nobody wants anything to do with Gaza, not even their Arab and Muslim brothers.

That article is nonsense... proven by merely reading it.

It does not supply one shred of evidence:
A.) Big claims, but with no evidence whatsoever.
B.) 2 anonymous sources, with no names, and no way to identify them or prove they even exist.
C.) Sleight of hand: Lots of genuine legal violations are mentioned, but these are for... accusations that are never proven.

Nowhere in this article is one bit of PROOF of ANYTHING WHATSOEVER.
It is, essentially, just an angry screed, and a lot of unproven claims.


BTW...
I don't need to discredit this news source... the article itself is just a lot of claims without evidence.
Whether or not the news source is pro hamas, we can be certain this particular article is nonsense by merely READING IT.

.

This is just to prove that they do have the technology and do use it for broadcasting audio to harass.

Simply unbelievable. A mere six months after the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust, and you are already an October 7th denier.

Sick and demented.

To warn is not to harass. Do you see your bias? In most wars nobody wars anyone. War is war and that's it.

I'll try to remember that Jewish lives are far more valuable to you than palestinians lives.

Three soldiers killed in Hamas rocket barrage toward Kerem Shalom, aid crossing closed

Now when Israel responds, well this video explains it:

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/DtoJX6SyS75QRizS/?

If that's the worst slaughter since the Holocaust, then the jews are doing pretty well compared to the palestinians. 200 Jews to nearly 40,000 palestinians so far. That's about 200 palestinians dead for every one Jew that's either dead or still a hostage.

I'll try to remember that Jewish lives are far more valuable to you than palestinians lives.

Yes of course it is maxwel. Of course both the article and recording are nonsense because Israel is good and palestinians are bad.

Flat out evil that you are trying to minimize their deaths by reciting an absurd number like 200.

Bet your one of them that say some ridiculously low number of Jews were killed in the Holocaust too

What the heck is wrong with you?

hostage taking of several thousand Jews,

I wrote this (in part): "Unlike a fetus, Hamas is a terrorist group"

And you responded like this...

"This movement is just another tint of "pro-choice" isn't it though? Following the mentality that, "it is our body (land or what have you) so we are rightful in aborting any unwanted "occupiers." "

The reference to "occupiers" clearly means fetuses.

I wrote this (in part): "Unlike a fetus, Hamas is a terrorist group"

And you responded like this...

"This movement is just another tint of "pro-choice" isn't it though? Following the mentality that, "it is our body (land or what have you) so we are rightful in aborting any unwanted "occupiers." "

The reference to "occupiers" clearly means fetuses.

Flat out evil that you are trying to minimize their deaths by reciting an absurd number like 200.

Bet your one of them that say some ridiculously low number of Jews were killed in the Holocaust too

What the heck is wrong with you?

Yahshua, let's clarify a few things.

1.) Please don't accuse me of saying things I didn't say.... lets treat each other fairly. Ok?

2.) Specifically, I never said "Israel is good and Palestinians are bad."

3.) I would never claim a piece of evidence is bad MERELY because of who presented it.
(However, there is a caveat in cases where we have no substantiation EXCEPT eyewitness testimony. When a piece of evidence, or a claim, has no substantiation EXCEPT an eyewitness, then the character of the witness must be considered, because there is simply no other way to weigh the evidence. Sometimes in this Israel/Palestine debate, on some occasions, we have ONLY eyewitness testimony, and in such cases we are logically compelled to consider the character of the eyewitness.)

4.) The arguments above are NOT arguments I made in rebutting any of your evidences... so please don't accuse me of doing things in ways I did not.

5.) I took the time to genuinely look over what you presented... and I simply found no substantiated evidence.
A. UNSUBSTANTIATED:
In both cases, the video and the article, I took the time to actually look at them, and then reported what I saw - that the claims were entirely unsubstantiated. I found zero documented data points of any kind.
B.) VIDEO:
I could make a dark video, of an unknown place, with no visible landmarks, and unknown people talking, without even showing their faces so you can't tell if they're even real people, and I could claim it means virtually anything... and I could make it in 5 minutes from my basement. That video simply didn't contrain proof or evidence of anything.
C.) ARTICLE:
The article simply gave no evidence. There were no names and identifiers of actual witnesses, no documentation of incidents, no documentation of anything. It was just a page of claims, with no evidence.

6. Conclusion:
I didn't claim the sovereign state of Israel is perfect and does no wrong; I merely claimed that the evidences you presented were not good evidences.


Have a great week.

.

Hmm what were you saying about lying?

the murder, rape, and hostage taking of several thousand Jews,

How about reading the sentence in it's entirety.

"They are calling the murder, rape, and hostage taking of several thousand Jews,"
The sentence includes the ENTIRETY of the list.

Geesh. Am I really dealing with this level of incompetent literacy?

Also, Yash compared the 200 to the 30,000 gazans, making it clear he was talking about the murders.

The spirit of this reply is completely different from the spirit of your previous reply to me. And please dont say otherwise as we both have been here for a while and can tell the difference in tone with a good deal of reliability. Likely because you didn't like the "spoonfed" line.

Anyone who's engaged me enough knows that I always initiate replies in good faith when it's done so with me until it ends. So please let's not feign innocence or assume you were being purely academic with your reply saying things like "nonsense" and "purely propaganda". That's concluding more than simply "not good evidence".

As I originally said, if you wanted to explore whether it was true or not you would have performed your own research, as we all have access to the same internet. You didn't want to, which is fine. Your prerogative. But typically those who don't want to know one way or another just deny any and all evidence presented rather than engage in study for fear that it will reveal something they rather not see.

Have a good week.