Predestination is misunderstood...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,150
2,168
113
Do you have any thoughts on why Paul bothered to give priority to the man to teach, if the man is the deceiver versus the woman is the easily deceived?
I don't see it as a given priority as much as it was an admonition against a woman exercising it, with that as an example of a result in disaster. I don't believe anyone has priority in the body as rule is of a lateral construct with the only hierarchy being Christ above all.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,150
2,168
113
I'm still a little confused on your answer.

Adam is the serpent in the Garden of Eden in your view?

And if yes, is Adam Satan?
Adam manifested that spirit, yes. And anyone that displayed such as spirit, Jesus called by the name, Satan, ie Peter.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
Adam manifested that spirit, yes. And anyone that displayed such as spirit, Jesus called by the name, Satan, ie Peter.
Adam never died until after he ate.

He also displayed the correct spirit and corrected the serpent.

Well they both did.

Adam and eve would have both eyeballed each other before correcting the serpent who had no doubt already ate of the tree.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
The serpent found a weakness in there innocence because that's what knowledge of evil does and the serpent must have also gained all knowledge of evil by also eating of the tree
 

Off123123123

Senior Member
Apr 3, 2006
291
33
28
USA
Predestination isn’t misunderstood. Many simply disapprove of its implications.

The implications? God creates some as objects for salvation, and he creates some for the purpose of destruction. He happens to tell those he has designed for destruction, that they must repent and believe, even though he didn’t create them to repent and believe. He is telling the objects meant for destruction they must somehow defy the very thing he created them for.

No misunderstandings from anyone, simply disagreement with its implications.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,150
2,168
113
Adam never died until after he ate.

He also displayed the correct spirit and corrected the serpent.

Well they both did.

Adam and eve would have both eyeballed each other before correcting the serpent who had no doubt already ate of the tree.
I posited that he fell in his thinking, that is 'going astray' in his mind/will, ie. from the purely intentional purpose of God's gracefully given gift which inherently contained such power, but he didn't die until he actually 'did' eat. This encapsulates the 'faith and works' controversy.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,150
2,168
113
Predestination isn’t misunderstood. Many simply disapprove of its implications.

The implications? God creates some as objects for salvation, and he creates some for the purpose of destruction. He happens to tell those he has designed for destruction, that they must repent and believe, even though he didn’t create them to repent and believe. He is telling the objects meant for destruction they must somehow defy the very thing he created them for.

No misunderstandings from anyone, simply disagreement with its implications.
You are being funny, yes?
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
I posited that he fell in his thinking, that is 'going astray' in his mind/will, ie. from the purely intentional purpose of God's gracefully given gift which inherently contained such power, but he didn't die until he actually 'did' eat. This encapsulates the 'faith and works' controversy.
obviously his thinking led to his fall, correct..but how consciously aware of spiritual death was he.

It may be he wasn't fully aware because the choice he made to eat was after he saw his wife alive after eating.

So as they where eyeballing each other with expressions before either one of them ate did that not fully sure conscious rub of on each other
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,150
2,168
113
No it’s literally the implications of saying God predestined certain people for salvation, and certain people for destruction.
Is salvation and destruction the objects of predestination? Or is the objects of which the contents of the affected vessels hold?
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
I posited that he fell in his thinking, that is 'going astray' in his mind/will, ie. from the purely intentional purpose of God's gracefully given gift which inherently contained such power, but he didn't die until he actually 'did' eat. This encapsulates the 'faith and works' controversy.
put yourself there for a moment.

Theres your wife eyeballing you, being told something contrary to what you've been made to believe.

Your wife raises here eyebrows with a don't know look. You raise your eye brows back with the same don't know look.

Before you know if your wife grabs some fruit and eat it's.

You see that she enjoys it and lives.

She passes it to you.

Do you a stop to think of every possibility before eating it.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,150
2,168
113
put yourself there for a moment.

Theres your wife eyeballing you, being told something contrary to what you've been made to believe.

Your wife raises here eyebrows with a don't know look. You raise your eye brows back with the same don't know look.

Before you know if your wife grabs some fruit and eat it's.

You see that she enjoys it and lives.

She passes it to you.

Do you a stop to think of every possibility before eating it.
My learning style doesn't process your teaching technique very well. I can only place myself into concreted scenarios if I am to be confident that they will hold.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
My learning style doesn't process your teaching technique very well. I can only place myself into concreted scenarios if I am to be confident that they will hold.
oh well please don't allow me to have anything then.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,578
9,094
113
Adam manifested that spirit, yes. And anyone that displayed such as spirit, Jesus called by the name, Satan, ie Peter.
So who did Jesus have a conversation with, and tempted by, in the wilderness?
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,471
453
83
Lets take a look at this

On the “Time” you eat, you will surely die

On the “Year” you eat, you will surely die

On the “Age” you eat you will surely die

On the “ago” you eat, you will surely die

On the “always” you eat you will surely die

On the “season” you eat you will surely die

On the “chronicles” you eat you will surely die

On the “continually” you eat you will surely die

On the “Ever” you eat you will surely die

On the “evermore” you eat, you will surely die

On the “day“ you eat you will surely die

Now lets look at what makes sense grammatically.

I see that “time” Season” “year” and “day” would all fit grammatically (they make sense in the sentence as written)

We know somethign happened the “moment” he ate as we look to the text

1. Adam forgot who God was

He tried to hide from him - Forgetting God was omnipresent
He tried to blame the woman, Forgetting that God was omniscient
He acted as a person who is tryign to defend himself (fleshly as scripture calls it) and owuld not take responsibility for his own sin

We see somethign broke in Adam, Adam who had walked for God for an unknown amount of time (could have been years, no one knows, we are not told) and Knew God intimately, all of a sudden, the things of God became “foolish to him”

This is spiritual death. Which occured the day, the moment, the time adam sinned.

So any of these would fit. Not only in context. But in reality.

This is how we should use scripture to interpret scripture when we have a word that has multiple meanings.
That's a good line of argument, E.G. I am happy with the translation "day". But God used the word and Peter says that for God a day is as a thousand years. So, from God's point of view He was saying, "Within the 1000 year day of your to eat (qal infinitive construct + 2nd person suffix) of it, to die you will be dying. (qal incomplete + 2nd person suffix)."

The idea seems to be that "within the 1000 year day starting from your eating of it, you won't completely die at once, but in order to die, you will be dying by degrees".

I agree with you that something broke when Adam sinned and he began to die by degrees. But someone who is beginnng to die, is not completely dead. Nor are they necessarily spiritually dead. They are losing vitality. They may be physically, psychologically and spiritually sick. But the Hebrew incomplete qal form of the verb does not support the idea that they became completely dead in any way because of Adam's sin.
 
Dec 18, 2023
6,402
406
83
Well you know God gives his knowledge freely

And if ye ask him truly what path is someone taking to better there wisdom of God's for knowledge .he will give it.

It just so turns out I've asked him thousands of times in the field of predestination, and waited patiently for an answer, through experience in this area of salvation also, is something I'm very aware hinders wisdom.
It's also a field I'm gifted in.

Which i thank God for.
 

ThereRoseaLamb

Well-known member
Jan 17, 2023
4,770
2,055
113
Predestination isn’t misunderstood. Many simply disapprove of its implications.

The implications? God creates some as objects for salvation, and he creates some for the purpose of destruction. He happens to tell those he has designed for destruction, that they must repent and believe, even though he didn’t create them to repent and believe. He is telling the objects meant for destruction they must somehow defy the very thing he created them for.

No misunderstandings from anyone, simply disagreement with its implications.

Kinda like nailing someone's foot to the floor and telling them to go for a walk and punishing them because they can't. I would say that's rather cruel.