Could Trump do anything to make you stop supporting him?

"This is an interesting confrontation. Texas Gov Greg Abbott has a ton of public support from both Republicans and Democrats to openly defy Joe Biden and the US Supreme Court. If Joe Biden does nothing, it looks like the weak President that he is. If Joe Biden sends in the FBI and massive numbers of Federal agents, he looks like he is trying to open the borders and assist an illegal invasion ... during an election year. There is no winning move here for Joe Biden."

Chip Roy urges Texas officials to ignore Supreme Court order on border razor wire: 'Go to hell' | Fox News

States have a right to protect their border and their citizens. Isn't the Constitution clear on this matter? If the Biden administration won't do its job, then the state must step up and do it for them.

Roy called the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision 'unconscionable'

A nation that cannot control its borders is not a nation. - Ronald Reagan

so, have you watched any of the j 6 videos that were posted, or looked at the links provided??

Yes It was a nothing burger,nothing to do with the question I asked about,just deflection.

"Why don't you make it about the issues!"

Wow!! This is ABSOLUTELY HILARIOUS


The most frightening thing is that Paul Depappy? The guy who attacked Pelosi's "husband". He appeared to be a left wing, drug addicted libtard right up until he was arrested for the attack and then for had an amazing transformation, setting up right wing websites!

Humpty Dumpty, this word is to you!

JUST IN! DONALD TRUMP JUST DROPPED THE HAMMER! [ YOU WILL BE BANNED FROM MAGA CAMP? ]


Man this is so entertaining, got to love the Lord!

J6 was a lie. The problem was and is no Republican had the stones to stand up and call it what it was, a peaceful protest.

What about MTG and Matt Gaetz?

I just heard another MAGA republican saying that he also was bribed to not run (Montana). I think this may explain why we are hearing this now, they probably have been investigating this to find out who else, and who was behind it and this is why Trump has also come out saying anyone who continues to donate to Nikki will be completely excommunicated from the new MAGA Republican party.

Secret Service Foreknowledge or Criminal Negligence? Damning New Evidence Surfaces In FBI’s January 6 “Pipe Bomb” Story
January 18, 2024 (7 days ago)

Over three years have passed since January 6, 2021, and the truth of what really happened that day has never been more relevant. For the regime, the stakes involved in selling the official narrative of January 6 as a uniquely horrific domestic terror event are higher than ever. Such are the stakes that Biden’s crypt-keepers presumably injected him with the strongest stuff they had to keep the President conscious and standing upright for the duration of his hour and a half-long speech marking the anniversary of the day “we almost lost America.” And it makes sense. The ludicrous notion of January 6 as an “insurrection” has long served as the key pretext for the accelerated political weaponization of the national security state against Trump and his supporters. More recently, the still more ludicrous theory of Trump’s culpability for this “insurrection” has become the sham legal basis behind the attempt to throw him in prison and remove him from the ballots—all in the name of democracy, of course.

That the regime has invested so much in the “insurrection” story of January 6th helps to explain its commensurate hostility to anyone who challenges that narrative. This applies especially to our reporting on what we’ve coined the “Fedsurrection”—the elements of January 6 that overwhelmingly point toward government involvement. Last year, we reported on a case in which an FBI agent investigating January 6 crimes had his security clearance revoked and his loyalty to the United States questioned simply for sharing one of our articles with colleagues. A top Democrat lawyer teamed up with Ray Epps to sue or threaten to sue Revolver News, Tucker Carlson, and anyone who asks uncomfortable questions about certain events during January 6, which Epps, in his own words, “orchestrated.”

Thankfully, such intimidation efforts aren’t working—in fact, quite the opposite. The DOJ’s decision to charge Ray Epps with a wrist-slap misdemeanor nearly three years after January 6, 2021, for which he is to serve no jail time, strikes anyone who is remotely informed about the case as a desperate and sloppy attempt to rescue an unsalvageable narrative. Although Speaker Mike Johnson has not followed through on his promise to release 40,000 hours of January 6 footage, the 90 or so hours he has released have done a great deal to popularize and reinforce the public’s understanding of just how inaccurate the official version of January 6th is. We say this footage popularizes and reinforces the public’s understanding of the Fedsurrection, but it does not advance this understanding. New footage depicting Capitol Police opening the doors or ushering crowds in or footage of Capitol Police committing violence against protestors is great for spreading awareness, but it doesn’t tell us anything new; similar types of footage have been around for a long time.

The Most Important January 6th Video You Have Never Heard About

Curiously enough, the Capitol did quietly release a damning short piece of footage that had gotten virtually no public attention, though it could very well be the breakthrough we need to definitively expose the phony January 6 “pipe bomb” story once and for all.

[Editor’s Note: This piece was published in password-protected form days ago, though originally embargoed, pending the publication this evening at 6:00 p.m. of an accompanying interview with Tucker Carlson on the pipe bomb. A piece published early yesterday afternoon by Steve Baker at the Blaze, however, addressed the video in question along with confirming an important detail, which we will address below.]

The Capitol authorities were counting on no one knowing that this footage even exists, let alone understanding its significance, and put up tremendous resistance when Congressman Massie tried to make the footage public. Ultimately, it took a direct call from Kevin McCarthy to break the stonewall (and one can only imagine how much pressure McCarthy must have been under to make that call!). Courtesy of Congressman Massie’s efforts, the footage is available below. For a first viewing, we encourage the reader to skim the video to get a general idea. Make note of the man in the backpack going up to the police and secret service cars. It will likely turn out that identifying this man in the backpack will lead to the unraveling of one of the darkest and most scandalous government coverups in recent history.

https://revolver.news/2024/01/secre...dence-surfaces-fbi-january-6-pipe-bomb-story/

Pretext for a Fedsurrection
Darren Beattie

https://americanmind.org/salvo/pretext-for-a-fedsurrection/

excellent report by mr. beattie, watched it a few days ago.

Matthew 13:5
ESV

For this people’s heart has grown dull, and with their ears they can barely hear, and their eyes they have closed, lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their heart and turn, and I would heal them.’

+++
You have willfully decided not to agree with truth

might want to check out the link in post# 3872 and see who is willfully not agreeing with truth.

People are making a big stink that Nathan Wade, the community college lawyer with the ambulance chasing practice that Fanni Willis hired was billing people for the work he was doing 24 hours a day, so not just the time spent at the office, but also the time spent at home, in the shower, in the bed. And also that much of this time spent preparing for these cases involved trips he and Fanni took together which led to his divorce. But we should empathize with Nathan, he knew what he was being paid for and apparently the time at home and in the shower was the worst part of the job, so of course he would bill for that time as well.

Also, people are mocking Fanni Willis for saying that "Lover Boy Wade" had impeccable credentials. What just because he was an ambulance chaser? Those aren't the credentials Fanni was talking about and who better to judge if he had impeccable credentials, if she thought so, who are we to judge. She says people are mocking because he is a black man, well that seems to simply perpetuate harmful stereotypes.

I think what people are trying to say is that for a case as significant as this one you need a legal scholar who specializes in constitutional law. You don't think Fanni tried? They most likely laughed at her and hurt her feelings (no doubt because she is a black woman, I think we know that she will be playing that card when this does go to trial).

I just know as soon as J6 happened, before any evidence came out Repubs were yapping about insurrection. They should have shut up until the evidence was clearer.

RINOs