Another shooting. Defending the indefensible.

There's all kinds of violence in Israel.
I watched a documentary that showed it as a popular place for the sodomites too unfortunately.

does not feel good to be told you should be in jail for an opinion, does it??

Yes, he can be somewhat annoying sometimes; however, I am not sure I should be ready to give up on him totally just yet...

<3

(It would be really nice to have the 'Friendly' emoticon/reaction - among others also - available for use in posts.)

I sincerely hope and pray that you will find your way [back?] to God.

Where did you visit in 1994?
Where did you visit in 2016?

Most of the terrorist attacks in Israel are not from the Jewish people.

No I think Alex Jones should be in jail for fraud for climbing that his vitamin supplements treat covid

I don't like what the Israelis are doing till the Palestinians because it's basically apartheid, however if the power dynamic were flipped there's little doubt in my mind it would result in genocide

Quercetin and Zinc have been proven effective in treating people with Covid.

Vitamin D showed up immediately as being the difference between mild and severe cases of Covid.

There is plenty of statistical evidence and clinical trials to support these claims.

You know that liberals never let the facts get in the way of a good narrative.

yes, without a doubt, the wall in Jerusalem is segregation on the grounds of ethnic background with a few unique differences. From what I understand the Palestinians want their own land under their own government, so the wall is simply a border between land governed by Israel and land governed by Palestinians. I think any reasonable person would agree that Israel needs to be able to control their border and know who is coming in and who is going out of the country.

Now they do something else which is to blow up the house of terrorists. These are people who killed others by suicide so there is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that they perpetrated the act. Victims have no one to sue. It is a horrible crime that is rooted in vengeance and unforgiveness. But there is a logic to it. Who would be the most likely person to know that this young man is about to do this act and would care for them? Their family. Iranians and others will pay people to commit acts of terrorism through suicide by promising to give their family a home. Therefore this penalty matches that, Iranians give their family a home and Israel will demolish the home. There is no financial incentive to killing people.

Why do mass shootings keep happening, and instead of caring for the victims, the first thing the Communists can think of is banning guns? If Communists really cared about people, they would want to ban vaccines, as the Covid vaccine killed far more people than guns did. Like you say, Occam's razor shows us that the simplest explanation is that Communists don't really care about people, and only want to ban guns because they're doing something, or going to do something, they know we would shoot them for if we found out.

Yeah we've been over this 15 billion times here but banning guns would require getting rid of the second amendment which would require a 2/3 vote for both the Senate and the house of representatives. That's about as likely to happen as my being drafted into the nba, marrying a super model, winning the lottery, and being struck by lightning in the same day
Gun confiscation is just the right wing talking point. It's not going to happen

The existence of Israel itself BY ITSELF should be enough to make a believer out of anybody.

If you have fallen away, I would beg you to reconsider your state. And the folly of it.

The Law isn't too soft on guns......The Law is too soft on Shooters.

It's easy to blame guns for mass shootings. But I've never seen a gun get to any scene of a mass shooting by itself. Someone brought it. That shows intention. Murder was already conceived in the heart and mind. That is the impetus.
I'll grant you that guns heightens the ability to do more damage if one is so inclined, but blaming guns merely keeps mental health issues and personal responsibility out of the equation.

I give up a number of rights every time I get in my car. I wear a seat belt. I have a number of safety devices in the car that increased the cost of the car. I had no say in that. I do not have the right to slander people, even though free speech is a freedom we enjoy.

I do not advocate the impossible. I won't say, "let's outlaw cars." They kill a lot of people. I will say, "Outlaw military grade weapons and limit access to guns so that mass murder is much harder to achieve".

I'm not into situation ethics or "what if?" scenarios. What I will say is that it is just as important to be responsible as it is to have rights. Not so many people are interested in responsibility these days. Does a parent have the right to send their children to school without fearing for their safety? Balance that against the right to bear arms.

Very amusing. Unfortunately, this will happen eventually. The cursed world government that secretly controls the Western world will enforce public rather than private car ownership. I admire Elon Musk for what he's done for the car industry. But he will also facilitate the end of private car ownership. As I said before:


"I give up a number of rights every time I get in my car. I wear a seat belt. I have a number of safety devices in the car that increased the cost of the car. I had no say in that. I do not have the right to slander people, even though free speech is a freedom we enjoy.

I do not advocate the impossible. I won't say, "let's outlaw cars." They kill a lot of people. I will say, "Outlaw military grade weapons and limit access to guns so that mass murder is much harder to achieve".

I'm not into situation ethics or "what if?" scenarios. What I will say is that it is just as important to be responsible as it is to have rights. Not so many people are interested in responsibility these days. Does a parent have the right to send their children to school without fearing for their safety? Balance that against the right to bear arms."

I wish that I could get inside the head of the American gun advocate. I might have a better idea of why some Americans are so obsessed. According to statistics I've seen, a bit under half of American households do not have a gun. That in itself I find intriguing,

I am not advocating the end of gun ownership. I'm advocating the end of military style weapons. Your argument about ammo capacity is specious. A knife wielder has limited opportunity. An AR15 has a 50 round magazine. How long does it take to replace an empty magazine with another 50 rounds? That depends on the skill of the shooter, but even a klutz won't take long.

Australians still have the right to own a gun. The kind of gun is controlled. That's the difference. It's not perfect but it's way better than the system in the USA.

Name a false flag mass shooting. I'm curious.

" the right to bear arms shall not be infringed."

not " a right to own a certain type of arms shall be regulated, and the right to own a certain type of approved arm shall be granted by the government unless they decide otherwise".

that is what you are saying.

your country had the right of freedom of movement and expression until the gov. decided to severely restrict both in the name of overblown, overcounted covid.