Why Daniel's 70th week must be in the future

We are seeing the fruit of the preterists now, as so many are blind to what is happening with the plandemic.

I actually believe private interpretations and allegory to explain away Scripture is sin.

The anti- christ will come as a Global ruler, and force his mark.
Jesus will rule on a physical Throne, on Earth.

Preterists do not, and will not understand unfolding events because of their unBiblical interpretations.

It sounds terribly like Sammy Davis Junior he is describing.
Why not?

concerning this tribulation spoke of which Jesus said would occure after the AOD mentioned by Daniel

This is what Jesus said in Matt 24.

21 For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be. 22 And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would be saved; but for the [c]elect’s sake those days will be shortened.

two things to think of.

1. Jerusalem was not around at the begining of the world
2. All flesh means all flesh. This was not possible in 70 AD, Even if every jew was killed. Flesh would still survive, (and did)

Also. Jesus told us how those days will be shortened.

29 “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. 30 Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

As we can see

1. All the people of the Earth will see him coming
2. This is not a local event. It is not just those In Jerusalem.
3. It happens immediately following the great tribulation. Where Jesus said he must bring to a close or no flesh would survive.

Until the past few decades, it was not even possible to wipe out all flesh on earth. With the advent of modern day weapons. it is a possibility

in comparison to WW1 and WW2 the events of 70 AD was a picnic.

Jesus is talking about two separate events EG

One is a localized event
16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:

The other is global

Jerusalem AD70 was like the first of many concentration camps, that is all.

the great tribulation will be greater than WW1 and WW2. that is hard for me to comprehend. But I believe God when he says it will happen.

2. All flesh means all flesh.

To lay all my cards out on the table; I'm not a preterist (i.e. "all prophecies fulfilled in the past") but a historicist (i.e. "parts of prophecy being fulfilled throughout history up to today with more to go")

It's a sinful Futurist lie EG, based on what?
Based on lies about Daniel 9 and other scriptures.
I do believe Futurist teachers will be held accountable for conning the gullible

No. He is speaks of the flesh of the elect who are alive when the Great Tribulation begins. If the Great Tribulation was going to last as long as it originally was intended to be, no elect would survive it so God changed the length of the Great Tribulation to be shorter than originally intended.

I was told that futurism was invented by the RCC (Ribera?)
Whether these accusations are true or not I have no idea, but that certainly
would line up with scripture;

Daniel 7 25 He will speak against the Most High and oppress his holy people and try to change the set times and the laws. The holy people will be delivered into his hands for a time, times and half a time.

Check - Did the RCC usurp God's authority?
Check - Did the Catholic Church persecute Jews?
Check - Did the RCC change the set times in Daniel?

I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at here. Are you citing this as a reason not to trust the account of Josephus regarding other historic testimony like the destruction of Jerusalem?


Isaiah 53:2
For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.


Who knows what he actually looked like, but it would seem that as far as Josephus was concerned the Messiah wasn't a handsome man by the world standards, which fits the scripture above.

or this?

Josephus’ Description of Jesus
3. (63) Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; (64) and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.
The Antiquities of the Jews, Book 18, Chapter 3
From The Works of Josephus,
translated by William Whiston
Hendrickson Publishers, 1987

Actually historicism was most likely invented by the RCC when they changed the interpretation of prophecy from a more literal approach to a more symbolic approach. They reject futurism as you do
they are ammils in their thinking. Ie, they think as you all these prophecies are completed

Because the city was razed to the ground. Men, women, children. All decimated. If many Jews didn't flee beforehand no one would've survived the initial blood-lust. There's testimony that during the siege food was cut off and so some even resorted to eating their children.

It's not about the number of deaths, it's about the severity of it all (intensity and duration). If there were only 30,000 people in a town and that entire town was slaughtered: men, women and children alike...with no quarter, no rest or surrendering allowed...and then the town burned with every building that survived the burning smashed to powder, that's considered a massacre.

Secondly, we need to remember that Daniel (as well as the disciples listening the Messiah during the Olivet Discourse) had no concern about "the world". They cared about what was going to happen TO THEM. Their concern was for their people. The Angel and The Messiah were speaking about the great suffering that would befall the Jews that wouldn't be matched "since there was a nation".

What nation of people has suffered (in intensity and duration) for hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years, since they were expelled from their homeland, more than the Jews?

We have to acknowledge (though some might not want to) that throughout history there were many surviving Jews hated and mistreated by many gentile Christians & Catholics for "murdering the Christ"; also considered "heretics" and "judaizers" to both papal authority as well as to laity and royalty...kicked out of countries...blamed for diseases...and they were also the primary victims of the inquisitions. And on and on throughout history.

Well Futurism and Preterism are to me two stinking abominations from the pit of hell.
They fulfill Daniel 7:25 and I can well believe that the RCC created them

I am going to capitalize this for the importance of it...
THE JEWS GOT WHAT THEY DESERVED FOR BEGINNING A WAR THEY COULD NEVER WIN!