We all know, that the ones who primarily cling to the idea of Supernatural gifts still existing today are the Charismatics. They also teach "individual" Spirit Baptism, which is not Biblical. No individual was ever baptized by are into the Holy Spirit according to the book of Acts. Check it out for yourself. Baptism in the Holy Spirit always occurred collectively. First upon the Jewish believers in Jerusalem and then later upon the Gentiles. The two aspects of baptism, placing all believers into the one and same Universal Assembly which Christ is building. The Pauline epistles, when dealing with this subject, are always looking back to these events.
As to the "gifts" of the Spirit, we still possess the ordinary gifts, as God gives to each the ability to Love the brethren, to Preach, to teach, to heal (as one does as a physician), each as the Lord sees fit.
However as to the extraordinary gifts, these have passed away for now and will be seen again as the Kingdom approaches. The apostle Paul said:
1Co 13:9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
1Co 13:10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
Let's examine these two verses for a moment. The immediate context is, we know in part and prophesy in part. The Scriptures were still being written. The entire revelation of God, to man, was still unfinished. Signs and wonders followed Christ's ministry to show He was the Son of God and they followed the infant church to show this assembly was a work of God. In verse 10, many say this points to the coming of the Lord, "But when that which is perfect is come.....", however, this view is not supported by the immediate context. The Greek word translated "PERFECT", comes from the word τέλειος and primarily means: "Complete, full or mature". In the immediate context, Paul was talking about the completion of Holy Scripture. When it is completed our knowing "in part" (v.10), will be done away with.
In this same way, the extraordinary gifts will cease as the revelation of God is completed. Once Scripture is complete, then the need for signs and wonders is rendered null. We know that Scripture is complete and nothing more will be added or taken away. This is not to say that miracles don't take place in God's Providence, they certainly do. Men have fallen from aircraft without a parachute and survived. A young boy fell 8 floors down an elevator shaft and didn't even have one broken bone. But miracles wrought out in Providence are not extraordinary gifts given to individuals. As previously stated, these have ceased because they are no longer needed. The infant church is no longer an infant church. Scripture is no longer being added on too.
Signs and wonders, did not happen as often as one might think in Scripture. God used these to often denote dispensational changes or in support of a God sent messenger. Often, hundreds of years passed without one single sign or wonder.
The Charismatic movement, which claims it has it's beginnings going back to Pentecost, ignores historical accuracy. This movement was not known in recent past church history. The original movement from whence it comes was known as "Pentecostalism". This movement was started around 1901 and the fathers of it are considered to be Charles Parham and William Seymour. The Charismatic movement did not begin until the 1960's. Going back to the 1600s,1700s and 1800's there is no mention of any church calling itself Charismatic or leaning on the "charismata" as a doctrine.
If charismatics were being honest with the Scriptures, then they would have to answer the following. If the power of healing, by laying on of hands, was not fading away, then why do we have these statements in God's Holy Word?
2Co 12:7 And by reason of the exceeding greatness of the revelations, that I should not be exalted overmuch, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to buffet me, that I should not be exalted overmuch.
2Co 12:8 Concerning this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart from me.
Why did Paul have to beseech the Lord three times and yet it was not removed? Why didn't he just heal himself or have one of the other Apostles lay hands on him? Again:
1Ti 5:23 Be no longer a drinker of water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thine often infirmities.
Timothy was often sickly and apparently suffered from a stomach infection or some other bowel disease. Why did Paul not just cure him? Why continue to let him suffer? Could it be, that Paul no longer could perform this extraordinary gift? Still again:
Php 2:26 since he longed after you all, and was sore troubled, because ye had heard that he was sick:
Php 2:27 for indeed he was sick nigh unto death: but God had mercy on him; and not on him only, but on me also, that I might not have sorrow upon sorrow.
Why didn't Paul come to the rescue of his dear friend? Epaphroditus was healed in the Providence of God not through the laying on of hands. God can do as he pleases. Heal some and send others to their death. And again?
2Ti 4:20 Erastus remained at Corinth: but Trophimus I left at Miletus sick.
WHAT.... Paul left him behind sick? Why wouldn't have Paul healed him and brought him along?
There is much the Charismatics overlook in favor of their experiences but if experiences don't match up with Scripture, then you better be asking: From where do these experiences come from? Are you sure there not phony signs and wonders that come from the Devil himself? This final thought... even though this was given to the Jews, it has it's application today:
Mark_13:22 for there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show signs and wonders, that they may lead astray, if possible, the elect.