How old is our creation really?

You support man's claim of evolution, where are transitional forms found in the fossil record?

But do you not see the possibility of multiple more outcomes then what the theory of evolution is trying to teach us?
That we shared a common ancestor with apes and evolved into modern humans?
Making you related to practicly all species on this earth through evolution. Because if they say you originated out of fish, you also originated out of everything following that up.
Do you honestly see no other outcome? That those species simply went extinct and our bio diversity was once much richer then it is today?
Being explained in the Bible by a global flood. That is where dino’s got extinct. These stories about dragons and pictures of dinosaurs are no coincedences but based on actual interactions with them in the past.

I’ve answered that dozens of times already.

Let’s try this. What do you believe is a transitional form? When you hear that word, what’s the image that comes to mind. I think the first issue is that many don’t know what a transitional form is. They believe it’s like a half half ape human or bird mammal and ect...

Yes. Humans evolved from a common ancestors and if you keep tracing that backwards it reaches fish and single cell species. The fish linage we came from was a species of Tiktaalik and before that a type of jawed fish.

If humans and dinosaurs ( dragons ) interacted together we would have evidence of it in the fossil record such as scarred dinosaur bones from human tools and so on.

I’ve answered that dozens of times already.

Let’s try this. What do you believe is a transitional form? When you hear that word, what’s the image that comes to mind. I think the first issue is that many don’t know what a transitional form is. They believe it’s like a half half ape human or bird mammal and ect...

Evolution teaches that species evolved over a (Long Period) of time.

If this claim were true, you would see forms in transition, progressing to another form, I don't believe there are any.

Archeopytryx is the only claim I know of, and it's not even in the ball park.

Piltdown Man in 1912 was a fabricated hoax, projecting the missing link between ape and man, and they kept it silent for 41 years, until it was in every public school text book and museum around the world.

The lie continues, the names have been changed to protect the guilty.

Yes. Humans evolved from a common ancestors and if you keep tracing that backwards it reaches fish and single cell species. The fish linage we came from was a species of Tiktaalik and before that a type of jawed fish.

If humans and dinosaurs ( dragons ) interacted together we would have evidence of it in the fossil record such as scarred dinosaur bones from human tools and so on.

You weren't there, you believe the writings and claims of (Man)

Just as Piltdown man was claimed to be a transitional form in 1912, a fabricated (Fraud) that continued for 41 years

Wikipedia: The Piltdown Man was a paleoanthropological fraud in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human. Although there were doubts about its authenticity virtually from the beginning, the remains were still broadly accepted for many years, and the falsity of the hoax was only definitively demonstrated in 1953. An extensive scientific review in 2016 established that amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson was its likely perpetrator.[1]

Group portrait of the Piltdown skull being examined. Back row (from left): F. O. Barlow, G. Elliot Smith, Charles Dawson, Arthur Smith Woodward. Front row: A. S. Underwood, Arthur Keith, W. P. Pycraft, and Ray Lankester. Note the portrait of Charles Darwin on the wall. Painting by John Cooke, 1915.
In 1912, Charles Dawson claimed that he had discovered the "missing link" between ape and man. In February 1912, Dawson contacted Arthur Smith Woodward, Keeper of Geology at the Natural History Museum, stating he had found a section of a human-like skull in Pleistocene gravel beds near Piltdown, East Sussex.[2] That summer, Dawson and Smith Woodward purportedly discovered more bones and artifacts at the site, which they connected to the same individual. These finds included a jawbone, more skull fragments, a set of teeth, and primitive tools.
Smith Woodward reconstructed the skull fragments and hypothesised that they belonged to a human ancestor from 500,000 years ago. The discovery was announced at a Geological Society meeting and was given the Latin name Eoanthropus dawsoni ("Dawson's dawn-man"). The questionable significance of the assemblage remained the subject of considerable controversy until it was conclusively exposed in 1953 as a forgery. It was found to have consisted of the altered mandible and some teeth of an orangutan deliberately combined with the cranium of a fully developed, though small-brained, modern human.
The Piltdown hoax is prominent for two reasons: the attention it generated around the subject of human evolution, and the length of time, 41 years, that elapsed from its alleged initial discovery to its definitive exposure as a composite forgery.

So is Lucy and every other ''proof'' they try to sell .. And Mars ? What some actually believe .. iM KULT RA

We, Biblical creationists, don’t deny species evolve.
We deny species can evolve from single cells into complex cells branching up in so much leading up to humanity.

Fallacy: non sequitur.

The absence of hominid fossils found with T. rex fossils does not in any way prove that humans were not alive during the Cretaceous period.

So is Lucy and every other ''proof'' they try to sell .. And Mars ? What some actually believe .. iM KULT RA

Evolution teaches that species evolved over a (Long Period) of time.

If this claim were true, you would see forms in transition, progressing to another form, I don't believe there are any.

Archeoptryx is the only claim I know of, and it's not even in the ball park.

I don't see the corollary...but if you do......

Archeoptryx is a feathered creature , it is a bird .. I posted earlier we already have dinosaurs, mammals , insects, and fish and that fly , but some birds don't fly .. Birds are fowl and all/only fowl have feathers .. Feathers are complicated and arranged each feather a unique size and place by design .. Birds and fish day 5 .. aquatic dinos spent most their time in water but designed to lay eggs on land, dinos day 6 .. Birds are older than dinos by 1 day

20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.

....weeeeell, I don’t know about that....if there are not man’s teeth marks on t rex’s ankles? Maybe we should be looking for man’s teeth in t rex’s belly!-),

I’ve answered that dozens of times already.

Let’s try this. What do you believe is a transitional form? When you hear that word, what’s the image that comes to mind. I think the first issue is that many don’t know what a transitional form is. They believe it’s like a half half ape human or bird mammal and ect...

Correction to correct ''and to but'' .. ''I posted earlier that we already have dinos, mammals, insects, and fish that fly ''but'' some birds that don't fly ..