^ Here's another post I made some time back (on this):
[quoting]
[...] 1Th5:2-3 (where Paul refers to the ARRIVAL of "the DOTL" time period, at the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]"... SAME ONE Jesus spoke of in His Olivet Discourse! )
So, if someone back then (hypothetically) were to "read back this [2nd] letter to Paul" [that he wrote to them, 2Th] and put it in other words, to show they've understood him, they could say,
[in view of v.2's "[don't let anyone convince you] that THE DAY OF THE LORD *IS PRESENT* [PERFECT indicative]" (JUDGMENTS unfolding upon the earth)]
v.3 (basically, in effect, saying) - "the ARRIVAL of the DOTL time period [v.2's Subject ^ ] [i.e. the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR; 1Th5:2-3]" (Matt24:4/Mk13:5)] will NOT be present [to unfold upon the earth] if not shall have come *THE RAPTURE [definite "noun-event" previously mentioned in this context] *FIRST* [(1Th4:13-17, 2Th2:1, and other refs) the text names ONE THING ONLY as *FIRST*] and [distinctly] the man of sin be revealed..."
(his "be revealed" corresponds with the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR; 1Th5:2-3; Matt24:4/Mk13:5]" at the START of the [7] trib yrs [not at its MIDDLE nor its END], same as in other related passages [i.e. the later Rev6:2 ref, and the previous Dan9:27a[26b] ref, etc etc...])
[ * the Greek uses the definite article ('THE'... 'THE DEPARTURE' [i.e. 'our Rapture' event from v.1], in v.3)]
[end quoting that old post]
[quoting]
[...] 1Th5:2-3 (where Paul refers to the ARRIVAL of "the DOTL" time period, at the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]"... SAME ONE Jesus spoke of in His Olivet Discourse! )
So, if someone back then (hypothetically) were to "read back this [2nd] letter to Paul" [that he wrote to them, 2Th] and put it in other words, to show they've understood him, they could say,
[in view of v.2's "[don't let anyone convince you] that THE DAY OF THE LORD *IS PRESENT* [PERFECT indicative]" (JUDGMENTS unfolding upon the earth)]
v.3 (basically, in effect, saying) - "the ARRIVAL of the DOTL time period [v.2's Subject ^ ] [i.e. the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR; 1Th5:2-3]" (Matt24:4/Mk13:5)] will NOT be present [to unfold upon the earth] if not shall have come *THE RAPTURE [definite "noun-event" previously mentioned in this context] *FIRST* [(1Th4:13-17, 2Th2:1, and other refs) the text names ONE THING ONLY as *FIRST*] and [distinctly] the man of sin be revealed..."
(his "be revealed" corresponds with the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR; 1Th5:2-3; Matt24:4/Mk13:5]" at the START of the [7] trib yrs [not at its MIDDLE nor its END], same as in other related passages [i.e. the later Rev6:2 ref, and the previous Dan9:27a[26b] ref, etc etc...])
[ * the Greek uses the definite article ('THE'... 'THE DEPARTURE' [i.e. 'our Rapture' event from v.1], in v.3)]
[end quoting that old post]