How do we distinguish false Christ & false Prophets according to Our Lord?

[Undergrace1]

Dont know if this answers the ops question:

Whoever speaks on their own does so to gain personal glory, but he who seeks the glory of the one who sent him is a man of truth; there is nothing false about him John7:18

I suppose it does where prophets would be concerned/people preaching a message

 

[Dino246]

The root of a wrong doctrine by Scribes & Pharisees were understanding the words of God in literal meaning. this is the reason why they asked Jesus to stop his disciples on the sabbath day.

Wrong. While they did take the law literally, Jesus never rebuked them for doing so. He rebuked them for applying it inconsistently and only to outward behaviour while failing to apply the more important matters.

Your stubborn refusal to accept sound explanation of Scripture is concerning.

This kind of understanding is a proof that you are taking the words of God in letter only.

I don't take every passage literally, but I do understand which passages to take literally. John 7:53-8:11 is one of them.

Who punished Jesus?
Pontius Pilate a Roman governor.

Who pushed Pontius Pilate to convict Jesus?
The Scribes & Pharisees.
Therefore in the eyes of the Jews and in your eyes it is the Romans who convict Jesus.

Did I say that only the Romans were responsible for executing Jesus? No. Is this even about Jesus? No. It's about the two thieves.

Don't put words in my mouth.

No wonder why who pushed the Romans to convict the 2 thieves were still the Scribes & Pharisees

That is complete speculation. There isn't a single word in Scripture suggesting that the scribes and Pharisees had anything to do with the execution of the two criminals or with "pushing the Romans" to do so.

Again you are taking the words of God in letter.
Whoever they are is not important.
What we are specifying here were those influential people (they are all not in truth) who are against the Lord Jesus (who is the truth John 14:6).

It's just evidence that you don't pay adequate attention to the text.

They don't make a trap.

Scripture says clearly and specifically that they did.

John 8:5-6 "In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

Your baseless, stubborn certainty that I am wrong and your vain attempts to "prove" it are blinding you to plain Scripture.

In fact they were honest on what they follow.
ROMANS 10:2-3
2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.

Romans 10 is not talking about scribes and Pharisees; it's talking about Jews. It has nothing specifically to do with the situation recorded in John 7-8.

This is the third time's showing that you are prooving taking the words of God in letter.

You can try a thousand times and still be wrong. I know which passages to treat as parabolic, which to treat as literal, which to treat as poetic, and which to treat as narrative because I have humbly learned from God and from His people how to interpret Scripture properly.

You have not.

I think you need to read more carefully.
Why don't you read the complete story of Mary Magdalene? How Jesus knew her?

Since you think I need to "read more carefully", please quote the passage you think I haven't read carefully enough.

Jesus did not allow the Jews to punish Mary Magdalene. Because the literal adultery committed by Mary Magdalene must be punishable by the Romans who governed them.

Wrong on two counts: firstly, it wasn't Mary Magdalene; and secondly, Jesus DID allow them to punish her, but He placed on them a condition they could not satisfy. The Roman restriction is not mentioned at all.

In fact in the eyes of Jesus the Jews particularly Scribes & Pharisees, doctors and teachers of the law (now I include them).

That's not even a complete sentence.

Although they were not committing literal adultery but they were committing Spiritual adultery.
MATTHEW 12:39
39 But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas:

That's not the same context and not even remotely the same issue. It's irrelevant to the woman caught in adultery.

Yes, Jesus described them as Evil generation too because they were preaching the words of God in literal meaning and not in spiritual meaning.

No, He did not. Not anywhere.

Whoever preaching the words of God in literal meaning only has no integrity in the eyes of God.

There is absolutely no scriptural support whatsoever for that idea.

 

[Godsgood]

Wrong. While they did take the law literally, Jesus never rebuked them for doing so. He rebuked them for applying it inconsistently and only to outward behaviour while failing to apply the more important matters.

Your stubborn refusal to accept sound explanation of Scripture is concerning.


I don't take every passage literally, but I do understand which passages to take literally. John 7:53-8:11 is one of them.


Did I say that only the Romans were responsible for executing Jesus? No. Is this even about Jesus? No. It's about the two thieves.

Don't put words in my mouth.


That is complete speculation. There isn't a single word in Scripture suggesting that the scribes and Pharisees had anything to do with the execution of the two criminals or with "pushing the Romans" to do so.


It's just evidence that you don't pay adequate attention to the text.


Scripture says clearly and specifically that they did.

John 8:5-6 "In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

Your baseless, stubborn certainty that I am wrong and your vain attempts to "prove" it are blinding you to plain Scripture.


Romans 10 is not talking about scribes and Pharisees; it's talking about Jews. It has nothing specifically to do with the situation recorded in John 7-8.


You can try a thousand times and still be wrong. I know which passages to treat as parabolic, which to treat as literal, which to treat as poetic, and which to treat as narrative because I have humbly learned from God and from His people how to interpret Scripture properly.

You have not.


Since you think I need to "read more carefully", please quote the passage you think I haven't read carefully enough.


Wrong on two counts: firstly, it wasn't Mary Magdalene; and secondly, Jesus DID allow them to punish her, but He placed on them a condition they could not satisfy. The Roman restriction is not mentioned at all.


That's not even a complete sentence.


That's not the same context and not even remotely the same issue. It's irrelevant to the woman caught in adultery.


No, He did not. Not anywhere.


There is absolutely no scriptural support whatsoever for that idea.

Wrong. While they did take the law literally, Jesus never rebuked them for doing so. He rebuked them for applying it inconsistently and only to outward behaviour while failing to apply the more important matters.
Your stubborn refusal to accept sound explanation of Scripture is concerning.
let you stick with your belief then.
But I will not say you are stubborn because you don't just believe on what I shared.
As the Lord said.
ROMANS 12:9
19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

I don't take every passage literally, but I do understand which passages to take literally. John 7:53-8:11 is one of them.
It is Lord Jesus who taught Paul how is the law.
And with what the Lord Jesus said, I asked him why he said the law is spiritual and he answered me.
John 7:53, yes I believe Jesus that he speaks parable on this. And in Jesus way, he explained the meanings so that John 8:11 will be fulfilled.
ROMANS 7:14
14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

Did I say that only the Romans were responsible for executing Jesus? No. Is this even about Jesus? No. It's about the two thieves.
Don't put words in my mouth.
You don't get the point. I will let you to stick with your own understanding.

That is complete speculation. There isn't a single word in Scripture suggesting that the scribes and Pharisees had anything to do with the execution of the two criminals or with "pushing the Romans" to do so.
In the New Testament, the separation of churches and state was already implemented by Lord Jesus. But the religious leaders on that time they were already influencing the government. This truth never passed away in our generation. That is the truth and not speculation.

It's just evidence that you don't pay adequate attention to the text.
Scribes, Pharisees, Doctors and teachers of the Law. There is no difference as long as they are not in truth.
What matters is the truth.

Scripture says clearly and specifically that they did.
John 8:5-6 "In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.
Your baseless, stubborn certainty that I am wrong and your vain attempts to "prove" it are blinding you to plain Scripture.
If you want specific word. It is not a trap. It is a tempt.
Again, I will not say that you are stubborn. God will do what is necessary in Romans 12:9
JOHN 8:5-6
5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.

You can try a thousand times and still be wrong. I know which passages to treat as parabolic, which to treat as literal, which to treat as poetic, and which to treat as narrative because I have humbly learned from God and from His people how to interpret Scripture properly.
You have not.
Again you can stick with what you believe. But what matters here is not what you believe, but the truth.
Even Scribes, Pharisees and the Jews believe that their God is the Father.
JOHN 8:41
41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

But to Lord Jesus, because they don't know who God the Father is. Their belief is not according to the truth.
JOHN 8:54-55
54 Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God:
55 Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying.

The truth is, if you can't identify who God the Father is, then your belief is not the truth.


Since you think I need to "read more carefully", please quote the passage you think I haven't read carefully enough.
Yes, to take this story literally you can't identify the name of the woman. Because there is no name written here but a word woman only.
This proves that your recognition to Jesus is not a revelation from the Father. Or else Jesus will reveal to you who the woman is.
JOHN 8:3-11
3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.
9 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

If you don't know the woman in John 8:3-11 then you still don't know this woman in Luke 7:36-39 because you are only after on what you read and understanding.
LUKE 7:36-39
36 And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee's house, and sat down to meat.
37 And, behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster box of ointment,
38 And stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment.
39 Now when the Pharisee which had bidden him saw it, he spake within himself, saying, This man, if he were a prophet, would have known who and what manner of woman this is that toucheth him: for she is a sinner.

This proves again that your knowledge in the words of God is from a man only and not after the Lord Jesus revelation.

 

[Dino246]

let you stick with your belief then.

I will because it is consistent with Scripture.

It is Lord Jesus who taught Paul how is the law.

That's is a meaningless jumble of words. You would do well to learn English far better if you intend to continue debating the content and meaning of Scripture in English.

And with what the Lord Jesus said, I asked him why he said the law is spiritual and he answered me.
John 7:53, yes I believe Jesus that he speaks parable on this. And in Jesus way, he explained the meanings so that John 8:11 will be fulfilled.
ROMANS 7:14 14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

Irrelevant blather.

You don't get the point. I will let you to stick with your own understanding.

I get it perfectly: you don't read Scripture carefully.

In the New Testament, the separation of churches and state was already implemented by Lord Jesus.

Chapter and verse, please.

But the religious leaders on that time they were already influencing the government. This truth never passed away in our generation. That is the truth and not speculation.

It's also irrelevant because Scripture does not say ANYTHING about the scribes and Pharisees influencing the Romans regarding the two criminals crucified with Jesus.

If you want specific word. It is not a trap. It is a tempt.
JOHN 8:5-6 5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.

John 8:6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

Don't be an ignorant fool; using a different translation doesn't prove me wrong.

Again you can stick with what you believe. But what matters here is not what you believe, but the truth.

Fortunately, I do believe the truth... and reject your errors.

The truth is, if you can't identify who God the Father is, then your belief is not the truth.

That "if" is rather important. I know that God is my Father. You have no argument against that.

Yes, to take this story literally you can't identify the name of the woman. Because there is no name written here but a word woman only.
This proves that your recognition to Jesus is not a revelation from the Father. Or else Jesus will reveal to you who the woman is.

It doesn't prove anything of the sort. It's just more silly blather from someone who spews it in abundance and can't put together a rational argument.

This proves again that your knowledge in the words of God is from a man only and not after the Lord Jesus revelation.

Again, no, it doesn't.

 

[Godsgood]

Wrong. While they did take the law literally, Jesus never rebuked them for doing so. He rebuked them for applying it inconsistently and only to outward behaviour while failing to apply the more important matters.

Your stubborn refusal to accept sound explanation of Scripture is concerning.


I don't take every passage literally, but I do understand which passages to take literally. John 7:53-8:11 is one of them.


Did I say that only the Romans were responsible for executing Jesus? No. Is this even about Jesus? No. It's about the two thieves.

Don't put words in my mouth.


That is complete speculation. There isn't a single word in Scripture suggesting that the scribes and Pharisees had anything to do with the execution of the two criminals or with "pushing the Romans" to do so.


It's just evidence that you don't pay adequate attention to the text.


Scripture says clearly and specifically that they did.

John 8:5-6 "In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

Your baseless, stubborn certainty that I am wrong and your vain attempts to "prove" it are blinding you to plain Scripture.


Romans 10 is not talking about scribes and Pharisees; it's talking about Jews. It has nothing specifically to do with the situation recorded in John 7-8.


You can try a thousand times and still be wrong. I know which passages to treat as parabolic, which to treat as literal, which to treat as poetic, and which to treat as narrative because I have humbly learned from God and from His people how to interpret Scripture properly.

You have not.


Since you think I need to "read more carefully", please quote the passage you think I haven't read carefully enough.


Wrong on two counts: firstly, it wasn't Mary Magdalene; and secondly, Jesus DID allow them to punish her, but He placed on them a condition they could not satisfy. The Roman restriction is not mentioned at all.


That's not even a complete sentence.


That's not the same context and not even remotely the same issue. It's irrelevant to the woman caught in adultery.


No, He did not. Not anywhere.


There is absolutely no scriptural support whatsoever for that idea.

Wrong on two counts: firstly, it wasn't Mary Magdalene; and secondly, Jesus DID allow them to punish her, but He placed on them a condition they could not satisfy. The Roman restriction is not mentioned at all.
The truth is. When the recognition to Jesus is not a revelation from the Father (yes, it requires a miracle to know the real Jesus) Jesus will not reveal the truth in his words (Mark 4:12)
The evidence is you don't know the woman in John 8:3-11.
Therefore you don't know what Jesus wrote in the ground too.
JOHN 8:7-8
7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

But to Jesus chosen, he reveal the truth.
If the recognition to Jesus is after man understanding only, then what is not written in the book will not be revealed by Jesus.
JOHN 21:25
25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.

The evidence that the recognition to Jesus is after man understanding only, is you can't identify who God the Father is.
JOHN 8:19
19 Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also.

 

[Dino246]

Wrong on two counts: firstly, it wasn't Mary Magdalene; and secondly, Jesus DID allow them to punish her, but He placed on them a condition they could not satisfy. The Roman restriction is not mentioned at all.
The truth is. When the recognition to Jesus is not a revelation from the Father (yes, it requires a miracle to know the real Jesus) Jesus will not reveal the truth in his words (Mark 4:12)
The evidence is you don't know the woman in John 8:3-11.
Therefore you don't know what Jesus wrote in the ground too.
JOHN 8:7-8
7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

But to Jesus chosen, he reveal the truth.
If the recognition to Jesus is after man understanding only, then what is not written in the book will not be revealed by Jesus.
JOHN 21:25
25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.

The evidence that the recognition to Jesus is after man understanding only, is you can't identify who God the Father is.
JOHN 8:19
19 Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also.

You can’t defend your silly ideas with Scripture so you attack your critics.

 

[Godsgood]

You can’t defend your silly ideas with Scripture so you attack your critics.

This website was created to share and to hear what is the truth.

Again let me say it once more.

I am not criticising and attacking anyone here.
I am sharing the truth in the Scripture.

The truth is:
If the recognition to Jesus is a revelation from the Father then the recognition to the Father will follow automatically (John 8:19).

Whoever could identify who the Father is then the sins will be forgiven (Jeremiah 31:34)

If the sins is fogiven then Jesus will reveal the truth in his words. There will be no more mysteries. Like in his Apostles & Disciples.
MARK 4:11
11 And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables:


I could discern that you have studied the words of God for how many years?
Because you are preaching your belief in the words of God here.
COLOSSIANS 3:9
9 Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds;

Despite of that years that you studied the words of God and you still don't know what Jesus wrote on the ground.
JOHN 8:8
8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

That is the evidence that your recognition to Jesus is not a revelation from God the Father but after man's understanding only.

And with that, this is what Jesus describe them.
MARK 4:12
12 That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.

As Jesus said those who don't see and yet still preaching what they believe. They are like a blind leaders who lead another blind.
MATTHEW 15:14
14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

 

[Dino246]

I am sharing the truth in the Scripture

No, you are sharing your opinions that don’t align with Scripture.

 

[Godsgood]

I will because it is consistent with Scripture.


That's is a meaningless jumble of words. You would do well to learn English far better if you intend to continue debating the content and meaning of Scripture in English.


Irrelevant blather.


I get it perfectly: you don't read Scripture carefully.


Chapter and verse, please.


It's also irrelevant because Scripture does not say ANYTHING about the scribes and Pharisees influencing the Romans regarding the two criminals crucified with Jesus.


John 8:6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

Don't be an ignorant fool; using a different translation doesn't prove me wrong.


Fortunately, I do believe the truth... and reject your errors.


That "if" is rather important. I know that God is my Father. You have no argument against that.


It doesn't prove anything of the sort. It's just more silly blather from someone who spews it in abundance and can't put together a rational argument.


Again, no, it doesn't.

In the New Testament, the separation of churches and state was already implemented by Lord Jesus.
Chapter and verse, please.
Even I will show the chapter & verse to you, I know you never understand. Instead you still say I'm ignorant and foolish.
This is the evidence that you are taking the words of God in letter. You are looking for a specific words for SEPARATION OF CHURCHES AND STATE which you never find out.
But with the revelation of Jesus He proved it.

And so I'm posting the chapter and verse for the seeker of the truth in this thread.

During the times of Jesus, he became popular due to many miracles he did, like by feeding the multitude from five barley loaves, and two small fishes .
With that situation, the people attempted to make him a political king.
But because there is a separation of churches (spiritual) and state (physical). And so Jesus came in this world for spiritual things for the salvation of the soul. And so he departed from them.
This scenario, Jesus shows the separation of churches and state.
JOHN 6:15
15 When Jesus therefore perceived that they would come and take him by force, to make him a king, he departed again into a mountain himself alone.

Jesus himself mentioned the separation of churches and state.
MARK 12:17
17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.

 

[Godsgood]

No, you are sharing your opinions that don’t align with Scripture.

The words of God never pass away (Matthew 24:35). Even in our generation we can still hear this accusation.
No, you are sharing your opinions that don’t align with Scripture
The Jews was accusing Jesus was just sharing his own opinion.
JOHN 10:33
33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.

But we all know that Jesus was sharing the truth.

 

[Dino246]

But we all know that Jesus was sharing the truth.

He was. You aren’t.

 

[rewriter]

In the New Testament, the separation of churches and state was already implemented by Lord Jesus.
Chapter and verse, please.
Even I will show the chapter & verse to you, I know you never understand. Instead you still say I'm ignorant and foolish.
This is the evidence that you are taking the words of God in letter. You are looking for a specific words for SEPARATION OF CHURCHES AND STATE which you never find out.
But with the revelation of Jesus He proved it.

And so I'm posting the chapter and verse for the seeker of the truth in this thread.

During the times of Jesus, he became popular due to many miracles he did, like by feeding the multitude from five barley loaves, and two small fishes .
With that situation, the people attempted to make him a political king.
But because there is a separation of churches (spiritual) and state (physical). And so Jesus came in this world for spiritual things for the salvation of the soul. And so he departed from them.
This scenario, Jesus shows the separation of churches and state.
JOHN 6:15
15 When Jesus therefore perceived that they would come and take him by force, to make him a king, he departed again into a mountain himself alone.

Jesus himself mentioned the separation of churches and state.
MARK 12:17
17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.

I have to disagree with you on this point. In the OT, God is very clear that government by humans is just trouble, that the proper approach is government by divinely appointed individuals and not hereditary. But He allowed kings because the people demanded them. But even in the quote about rendering to Caesar, if you pushed Jesus very far, He likely would have asked you, who created Caesar? He did not support the separation fo church and state, he held church (the divine) over state. The separation comes from the state claiming power over the church, and the church all too often acquiescing in exchange for a little political power.

 

[Dino246]

In the New Testament, the separation of churches and state was already implemented by Lord Jesus.
Chapter and verse, please.
Even I will show the chapter & verse to you, I know you never understand. Instead you still say I'm ignorant and foolish.
This is the evidence that you are taking the words of God in letter. You are looking for a specific words for SEPARATION OF CHURCHES AND STATE which you never find out.
But with the revelation of Jesus He proved it.

And so I'm posting the chapter and verse for the seeker of the truth in this thread.

During the times of Jesus, he became popular due to many miracles he did, like by feeding the multitude from five barley loaves, and two small fishes .
With that situation, the people attempted to make him a political king.
But because there is a separation of churches (spiritual) and state (physical). And so Jesus came in this world for spiritual things for the salvation of the soul. And so he departed from them.
This scenario, Jesus shows the separation of churches and state.
JOHN 6:15
15 When Jesus therefore perceived that they would come and take him by force, to make him a king, he departed again into a mountain himself alone.

Jesus himself mentioned the separation of churches and state.
MARK 12:17
17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.

This is all irrelevant blather. You claim that God has revealed truth to you regarding the meaning of His word, but your "revelations" either aren't consistent with Scripture or they don't amount to a hill of beans... like the above. You have your "interpretation" supporting your claim that Jesus separated church and state, but really what you have is a couple of barely-relevant verses that don't actually support your claim. Even if they did, what does it matter? That isn't a primary point of argument. I just challenged you to support your claim, and instead of just respectfully providing the verses and explaining how you see them as relevant, you attack me.

You still have not supported your slander of me. Instead you repeat it, still without any actual relevant evidence. Quoting Scripture won't cut it because you MUST quote ME to prove that I believe (or don't believe) something. You haven't. I doubt you ever will. False teachers and slanderers recoil at the idea of accountability.

You still have not made any sense of the fact that your view of God's word as all parables is self-refuting. Instead you change the subject. You lack integrity.

 

[Follower777]

This is all irrelevant blather. You claim that God has revealed truth to you regarding the meaning of His word, but your "revelations" either aren't consistent with Scripture or they don't amount to a hill of beans...

You still have not supported your slander of me. Instead you repeat it, still without any actual relevant evidence. Quoting Scripture won't cut it because you MUST quote ME to prove that I believe (or don't believe) something. You haven't. I doubt you ever will. False teachers and slanderers recoil at the idea of accountability.

You still have not made any sense of the fact that your view of God's word as all parables is self-refuting. Instead you change the subject. You lack integrity.

"Dino" ... I come back from a sabbatical from this CC, and you are still talking and acting as an agent of Antichrist... Still promoting the "Religion of Disobedience", to our Creator God. Still exhibiting the characteristics of the False Prophet of Satan and the UN-holy trinity of the Dragon (Satan) The Beast ( The Papacy = anti-Christ = 2 Thessalonians 2:3–8 ) ... Revelation 16:13 states: "And I saw three unclean spirits that looked like frogs coming out of the mouths of the dragon, the beast, and the false prophet."

@Dino246 ... one of millions of false prophets that Jesus said would appear during these final days of Earth history, right before the eminent Second Advent of our Lord and King.

False Prophets, mixing just enough poisonous, disobedient theology to God's Truth, the Teachings of Jesus, to lead and deceive potential Christians, down a path to perdition... Which is the desire of those believing and following the Anti-Christ spirit in the world, because of their love of themselves ( Pride) and their love of sin, the flesh and this evil world. ~~> 1 John 2:16

... and as Dino told @Godsgood, ... @Dino246 told me the same things ... That I can't make these accusations ( "I'm stupid and ignorant") and that "I don't know Dino ". ... Therefore can't know who and what Dino looks & is acting like (antiChrist)
... False Prophets work for the "other side" ... opposing Jesus and His Righteousness.

I know you ( Dino) by your fruits .. what you say and how you act... Matthew 7:16
I know you well enuf to not waste any more time, preaching / evangelizing you Pharisaical types here in the CC, which is why I've moved outta here, to minister to folks that are still looking for the truth, wanting to know Jesus. More fertile grounds for planting seeds.

Jesus says, you shall know them by their fruits... and Mr Dino246 .. YOU ... bears the fruits of unbelief, ... disobedience to God, and a malignant character rather than LOVE ... => the "Righteousness of Christ"

Don't bother replying "Dino" .. I'll not reply to the likes of you ... ( unless you are repenting )

But I just had to say something @Godsgood ... to let him know.. that unless, he's coming to an understanding of what we Christians are up against, ( why "I" spent time in the CC ) learning the apostasy. hypocrisy, delusion, and deceptions of this Last Days religious world, ... I've done as Jesus said to do ... ( with these anti-Christ pharisee types ) .. Don't waste your precious witnessing time, ... move to less "hard ground" ~> Parable of the Sower Luke 8:4-9

Matt 10:14
"And whoever will not receive you nor hear your words, when you depart from that house or city, shake off the dust from your feet."

1. Matthew 24:23-26 – "Jesus warns about false Christs and false prophets who will show great signs and wonders to deceive even the elect." ~~ This passage highlights the deceptive nature of false prophets who will claim to represent Christ.
2. 2 Peter 2:1-3 –
   But in the world, there have been also false prophets, as there will likewise be false teachers among you, who will bring in destructive heresies, denying the Lord that bought them; thus bringing on themselves swift destruction. 2 And many will go after their profaneness; on account of whom, the way of truth will be reproached. 3 And, in the cupidity of raving words, they will make merchandise of you: whose judgment, of a long time, is not idle; and their destruction slumbereth not.
   Peter warns about false teachers who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord, and bringing swift destruction upon themselves. These teachers will exploit believers with false ( disobedient & prideful ) doctrine
3. 1 John 4:1 – "Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world." ~~ This verse advises caution and discernment when encountering those who claim to speak for God. ( @Dino246 )

~~ Blessed Sabbath Folks ~~

****************** ΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣ ΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣΙΧΘΥΣ ******************​

 

[Dino246]

"Dino" ... I come back from a sabbatical from this CC, and you are still talking and acting as an agent of Antichrist... Still promoting the "Religion of Disobedience", to our Creator God. Still exhibiting the characteristics of the False Prophet of Satan and the UN-holy trinity of the Dragon (Satan) The Beast ( The Papacy = anti-Christ = 2 Thessalonians 2:3–8 ) ... Revelation 16:13 states: "And I saw three unclean spirits that looked like frogs coming out of the mouths of the dragon, the beast, and the false prophet."

When person one makes FALSE claims about Scripture (as Godsgood has done so repeatedly), and person two calls them on it, person two is not an agent of the antichrist.

Given that, the rest of your rant is redundant.

 

[Follower777]

Here's a pastor's Biblical explanation of Prophecy, pointing to these Last Day Events, and the exposing of the Anti-Christ, its doctrines and her deception of humanity.

~~ Conrad Vine Sermon – End-Time Sign: A “Falling Away” Inside The Church ~~

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++​