Is Anything Not Predestinated by God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
As I understand it Open Theism is a view that a weak God sits on the sidelines watching what happens. This is in contrast with a powerful God that controls everything that happens in everyone's life.

So, God controls me even when I sin. Got it. I have no accountability because it is what I was determined to do by an all-powerful God. Is this what you are subscribing to?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dino246
Neither you nor @Jordan understand what Open Theism is. You are arguing against something you have not taken the time to understand, but you have believed a strawman version of Open Theism that closed theist have invented to poison the well against their opposition.

Open theism simply asserts that God is free and has the power to do something different from what He originally intended to do, and therefore the future has not been settled from the beginning. Rather than this being a weak God who merely observes from the sidelines, this is a Powerful and wise God who is able to interact with the decisions of creatures to keep His ultimate goals viable no matter what creatures choose to do.

Closed Theism asserts that God has always known from the beginning of creation exactly what will happen at every point in history. That is what both exhaustive predeterminism (e.g Calvinism) and exhaustive foreknowledge or compatibilism (e.g. Molinism)) all assert. If anyone concedes that God can change the future from what He originally expected to happen, even in one point, they are an open theist. This version of God is weaker and less wise that the Open God, because He cannot have confidence that He id able to achieve His ultimate purposes without either controlling or knowing in advance absolutely every possible move of His creatures.

God has stated in his word that there are certain outcomes in which he will not repent, mainly, his long-term plan for the nation of Israel. But it is obvious as one studies scripture, that God has given man the freedom to live and make choices, and these choices have consequences, but the almighty God works in and through these choices to ultimately bring about his desired end as stated in scripture.
 
So, God controls me even when I sin. Got it. I have no accountability because it is what I was determined to do by an all-powerful God. Is this what you are subscribing to?
The lord is not just a shepherd but he's also our master, and no where did he imply he's forces you against your will,

What his will does is change you from the inside out, where as you decide to say forceful instead , like so many who are in rebellion they will not take a simple request to be told what to do or even corrected, just like the many scriptures I've posted that had no suitable answers by @PaulThomson, who has willfully forced his ideas onto me, without even bating an eye lid like you,

No asking just labelling as labelers always do
 
One of the things Jesus said, Was that harlots and publicans will enter into the kingdom of heaven. But those others will not.
Jesus also said, By everyone's works they shall be judged in the last day.

A person can claim they are saved and be a Christain, and another person can be unsaved and not a Christian. The one who is not saved might have God's favor and the one who says they are saved will not have so much favor. We know we love God, if we obey he's commandments.
 
Is this what you are subscribing to?

If you would have read more closely, you could have seen that I was contrasting two extreme views with a more moderate one.
 
The lord is not just a shepherd but he's also our master, and no where did he imply he's forces you against your will,

What his will does is change you from the inside out, where as you decide to say forceful instead , like so many who are in rebellion they will not take a simple request to be told what to do or even corrected, just like the many scriptures I've posted that had no suitable answers by @PaulThomson, who has willfully forced his ideas onto me, without even bating an eye lid like you,

No asking just labelling as labelers always do

Quote: This is in contrast with a powerful God that controls everything that happens in everyone's life.

Are you on board with this quote?
 
Is this what you are subscribing to?

If you would have read more closely, you could have seen that I was contrasting two extreme views with a more moderate one.

Fair enough but using the words "weak God" kind of indicated that you were in favor of the other brand you stated.
 
Quote: This is in contrast with a powerful God that controls everything that happens in everyone's life.

Are you on board with this quote?
One of the fruits is self control he places in you, so maybe you could accept that he sees your controlling nature as something that's needs controlling
 
No denial of omniscience, unlike Open Theism

Open theism does not deny omniscience.

It defines omniscience differently from the classical theory. It defines omniscience as knowing everything that IS true.

It does not presume that every aspect of the future is knowable in advance as true NOW by God, since the scriptures do not say that every aspect of the future is known NOW by God. The idea that every aspect of the future is known NOW by God is derived from Greek platonic reasoning that is flawed. Platonic reasoning considers that, after change, "what was" has become either better than "it was" or worse than "it was". That is an invalid premise.

God can change and yet still remain perfect. A good child can change into an equally good adolescent and then into an equally good adult. They do not have to become a better or a worse person just because they change. A beautiful rock can be sculpted into a beautiful human form. That the rock has become different does not mean that the rock was worse than the sculpture.

Closed theist are post hoc rationalising how God can interact with creation without Him changing, because they assume He cannot change: that He is immutable. But their rationalisation is unnecessary, if scripture gives examples of God changing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John146
Open theism does not deny omniscience.

It defines omniscience differently from the classical theory. It defines omniscience as knowing everything that IS true.

It does not presume that every aspect of the future is knowable in advance as true NOW by God, since the scriptures do not say that every aspect of the future is known NOW by God. The idea that every aspect of the future is known NOW by God is derived from Greek platonic reasoning that is flawed. Platonic reasoning considers that, after change, "what was" has become either better than "it was" or worse than "it was". That is an invalid premise.

God can change and yet still remain perfect. A good child can change into an equally good adolescent and then into an equally good adult. They do not have to become a better or a worse person just because they change. A beautiful rock can be sculpted into a beautiful human form. That the rock has become different does not mean that the rock was worse than the sculpture.

Closed theist are post hoc rationalising how God can interact with creation without Him changing, because they assume He cannot change: that He is immutable. But their rationalisation is unnecessary, if scripture gives examples of God changing.
Then you obviously disagree with its established, historical, literal meaning.
 
One of the fruits is self control he places in you, so maybe you could accept that he sees your controlling nature as something that's needs controlling

Just pointing out a false narrative brother. I never claimed that's your view, just asking a question. And the fruit is "temperance". ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sipsey
Open theism does not deny omniscience.

It defines omniscience differently from the classical theory. It defines omniscience as knowing everything that IS true.

It does not presume that every aspect of the future is knowable in advance as true NOW by God, since the scriptures do not say that every aspect of the future is known NOW by God. The idea that every aspect of the future is known NOW by God is derived from Greek platonic reasoning that is flawed. Platonic reasoning considers that, after change, "what was" has become either better than "it was" or worse than "it was". That is an invalid premise.

God can change and yet still remain perfect. A good child can change into an equally good adolescent and then into an equally good adult. They do not have to become a better or a worse person just because they change. A beautiful rock can be sculpted into a beautiful human form. That the rock has become different does not mean that the rock was worse than the sculpture.

Closed theist are post hoc rationalising how God can interact with creation without Him changing, because they assume He cannot change: that He is immutable. But their rationalisation is unnecessary, if scripture gives examples of God changing.

I use the book of Jonah as an example. God changed his mind based upon the response of Nineveh to his word. God did not do what he said he would do unto them. This does not make God a liar, but a reachable, touchable God by responding to his word. Imagine a God so powerful that he is working in and through the decisions of man, and yet, never compromising who he is.

Jonah 3:10 And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.
 
Just pointing out a false narrative brother. I never claimed that's your view, just asking a question. And the fruit is "temperance". ;)
The KJV word is "temperance" which was poisoned by the "temperance" movement of the early 1900's to mean abstinence from alcohol. "Self control" is a perfectly adequate translation... and probably better because "temperance" is nearly archaic now.
 
I use the book of Jonah as an example. God changed his mind based upon the response of Nineveh to his word. God did not do what he said he would do unto them. This does not make God a liar, but a reachable, touchable God by responding to his word. Imagine a God so powerful that he is working in and through the decisions of man, and yet, never compromising who he is.

Jonah 3:10 And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.
Do you see God actually changing His mind, or simply showing mercy, instead of judgement?
 
Do you see God actually changing His mind, or simply showing mercy, instead of judgement?
Wasn't God showing mercy to announce His intentions in the first place. In doing so, God provided an opportunity for Nineveh to 'realign' their 'perspective' to harmonize with His, and their adjustment satisfied His conditions, accordingly, per His judgment.
 
Wasn't God showing mercy to announce His intentions in the first place. In doing so, God provided an opportunity for Nineveh to 'realign' their 'perspective' to harmonize with His, and their adjustment satisfied His conditions, accordingly, per His judgment.
If not for His mercy, none would be saved.
 
Do you see God actually changing His mind, or simply showing mercy, instead of judgement?

Both, the scripture literally states, "and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not."

God specifically told them that in forty days he would overthrow them. He did not overthrow them. He changed his plans for them based upon their response to his word.
 
Both, the scripture literally states, "and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not."

God specifically told them that in forty days he would overthrow them. He did not overthrow them. He changed his plans for them based upon their response to his word.
Have you heard of the term anthropomorphism?