There you go again.Right. Something new in 'discovery', but nothing new in practice.
Gal 1:8
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Just a matter of time before people with failed argument start taking rejection personally. Especially new revelation angels from heaven. Rejection becomes some sort of 'persecution' complex.
All snippy non answers.Correct, and descends upon a high mount on the new earth.
Mat 24:30
And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
Mat 24:31
And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
No four winds in heaven, but in the air of the earth, that the Lord returns to with clouds. In the Bible, we see that the Lord also calls the sky above the earth, from which the rain falls, heaven:
Gen 1:9
And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
Gen 1:20
And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
Many people show they only say things they want to believe about the Bible, by exposing their ignorance of basic Bible things, that any beginning reader would know... But, correction in the Bible basics is still a good exercise.
Already challenged by Scripture enough times. Repeating yourself doesn't make it any more true.
Mat 6:7
But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^Lol
The new Jerusalem COMES FROM HEAVEN.
JESUS framed the mansion construction in heaven.
It is crystal clear.
Literally impossible to miss.
Your banner verse of mat 24, has a gathering IN HEAVEN BY ANGELS.
The bride becomes the wife IN HEAVEN.
THE CONSUMATION IN HEAVEN.
THE WINE IS THE CONSUMATION IN HEAVEN
THE MANSIONS AND JESUS PROPHECY IS IN HEAVEN
THE 144,000 ABD THE JEWISH MAIN HARVEST IS TO HEAVEN.
AHEM....years before your "one coming" of rev 19.
SMH
So, this is new.
There is one coming again and appearing a second time of the Lord to earth from heaven.
The two comings of the Lord are first in the flesh, and next in the air.
Right. Something new in 'discovery', but nothing new in practice.
Gal 1:8
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Just a matter of time before people with failed argument start taking rejection personally. Especially new revelation angels from heaven. Rejection becomes some sort of 'persecution' complex.
Correct. OT Jacob now NT Israel of God's trouble on earth.QUOTE
""Jacob's trouble was persecution of Jews before the Lord comes in the flesh. Jacob is now Israel's trouble in these last days, until the Lord comes again with power.""
Why is it that so many churches, doctrines, people, want to follow the teachings of the rapture when in so many places God tell us it is a lie?
Sabbath is a person.
Jesus has become our sabbath rest.
Your Right, I am trying to provoke you "non-Sabbathing" people, to come to Jesus, as our Lord and King. For Jesus, told you "pharisee types" ... "For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day. Matthew 12:8Afterall, we don't know that he's just trying to provoke us non-Sabbathing Christians...
I have recently embraced the pre-trib view. It is the view I was taught when I was saved and I should of stuck with it instead of wondering off into chaos.Why is it that so many churches, doctrines, people, want to follow the teachings of the rapture when in so many places God tell us it is a lie?
Matthew 13 (NIV)
The Parable of the Weeds Explained
36Then he left the crowd and went into the house. His disciples came to him and said, “Explain to us the parable of the weeds in the field.”
37He answered, “The one who sowed the good seed is the Son of Man. 38The field is the world, and the good seed stands for the people of the kingdom. The weeds are the people of the evil one, 39and the enemy who sows them is the devil. The harvest is the end of the age, and the harvesters are angels.
40“As the weeds are pulled up and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of the age. 41The Son of Man will send out his angels, and they will weed out of his kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil. 42They will throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 43Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Whoever has ears, let them hear.
Matthew 24
The Return of the Son of Man
(Mark 13:24-27; Luke 21:25-28)
26Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. 27For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 28For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together.
29Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: 30And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
You can also find this in Mark 13 and Luke 21.
To be continued .
The way to realize that "the rapture" ( a man made concept ) is actually referring to the "being caught up, into the air, with Jesus at His second coming, is to believing Jesus and His Prophecy pointing to the 3 1/2 year, 42 month, 1260 days = 1260 YEARS, as I explained in the above #448 post. The Antichrist manufactured, and then indoctrinated us, during these last 500+ years, with this "7 years" pre-tribulation concept, to deceive people way from the Truth, away from Jesus and towards perdition.The only way to make a post-tribulation rapture work is if you are amillennial or postmillennial.
Not true. I can futurism from the 2nd century in Irenaeus' writings. This is something historicists like to repeat with no evidence.The way to realize that "the rapture" ( a man made concept ) is actually referring to the "being caught up, into the air, with Jesus at His second coming, is to believing Jesus and His Prophecy pointing to the 3 1/2 year, 42 month, 1260 days = 1260 YEARS, as I explained in the above #448 post. The Antichrist manufactured, and then indoctrinated us, during these last 500+ years, with this "7 years" pre-tribulation concept, to deceive people way from the Truth, away from Jesus and towards perdition.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I admit that though I've heard of " Irenaeus", I knew very little of his theological stance. But with our modern access to the knowledge of the world, thru the WWW and the AI search engine, here is what I've learned;Not true. I can futurism from the 2nd century in Irenaeus' writings. This is something historicists like to repeat with no evidence.
Try to find me a single early Church father who claimed the 1260 days is 1260 years. Now that is a new teaching.
And at the end of the day who cares about the ECFs and what they believed, lets go by what the Bible teaches.
AI Web Search said:Francisco Ribera de Villacastín (c. 1537 – 1591) is best known for formulating what later became called historic‑premillennialism, often referred to as “Futurist” interpretation of biblical prophecy. In his seminal work De Adventu Christi (1585) Ribera argued that the apocalyptic visions in Daniel and Revelation describe events that will occur in the future, specifically a literal seven‑year tribulation period followed by Christ’s literal thousand‑year reign on earth.
Key points of Ribera’s Futurist scheme:
Ribera’s ideas were largely a reaction against the preterist and idealistic readings dominant in the Reformation era, which tended to locate the apocalyptic events in the early church or in symbolic spiritual realities.
- Literal fulfillment – Prophetic symbols (the beast, the antichrist, the “little horn,” etc.) are to be understood as real, future persons or institutions rather than as symbolic representations of past events.
- Separate tribulation – The “great tribulation” described in Matthew 24 and Revelation is a distinct, future seven‑year period preceding Christ’s return.
- Chronological order – The prophetic timeline proceeds chronologically: Daniel’s seventy‑week prophecy culminates in the tribulation, after which the millennium begins.
Connection to Irenaeus (2nd century)
Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130 – 202 CE) wrote extensively against Gnostic interpretations of Scripture and defended an already‑but‑not‑yet view of the Kingdom of God. While he did not articulate a Futurist framework in the modern sense, he did:
Later scholars have noted that Irenaeus’ insistence on a future, literal fulfillment of certain prophecies provides a distant antecedent to the kind of literal‑future expectation that Ribera would systematize. However, Irenaeus did not develop the detailed chronology (seven‑year tribulation, millennial reign, etc.) that characterizes Ribera’s Futurism.
- Emphasize a future consummation of God’s plan, arguing that the “last days” would bring a final judgment and the full establishment of the Kingdom.
- Reject purely symbolic readings of prophetic texts, insisting that many prophecies point toward real future events (e.g., the resurrection of the dead).
Summary
Thus, while Irenaeus’ writings contain seeds of a future‑oriented eschatology, the fully developed Futurist biblical theology as presented by Francisco Ribera is a much later formulation that builds on, but goes far beyond, the early church father’s perspective.
- Ribera created a structured Futurist interpretation in the late 16th century, focusing on a literal, future tribulation and millennium.
- Irenaeus (2nd century) affirmed that some biblical prophecies anticipate real future events, but he did not elaborate the specific timeline or categories that Ribera later defined.
Yeah, that would be novel ! ... since the Book of Daniel was sealed "until the end" . Your not going to find any "early church fathers" able to understand, or comment on these events, because they hadn't happened yet.Try to find me a single early Church father who claimed the 1260 days is 1260 years. Now that is a new teaching"
Most professed Christian's are following the Dispensational doctrine, today, that was developed by the Roman Church, to be a counter argument, ... reply to the Protestant Reformers. As ALL the Protestant Reformers, including Martin Luther, proclaimed and battled the Papacy, as The Antichrist. by the reformer's correct understanding of scripture, specifically correct Bible prophecy interpretations.
… this is a VERY brief explanation of the peoples and progress of the development of dispensationalism to become the predominate understanding by professed Christians today.
There are three main different methods of interpreting prophecy;
Historicist, the way Jesus proclaimed prophecy.
Preterism, an approach to biblical eschatology, was first systematically expounded by the Jesuit Luis de Alcasar in the 17th century during the Counter-Reformation
Futurism, … was developed by Jesuit Francisco Ribera, who published his futurist views in 1585 at the request of the Catholic Council of Trent, held between 1545 and 1563, as part of the Counter-Protestant Reformation.
This futurist "theory" was picked up by John Nelson Darby (1800-1882), and developed into what is now referred to as Dispensationalism, which was then made popular by the Scofield Reference Bible, which used this theory in it's "study side notes". The study bible became popular in many theological schools, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, like Moody Bible Institute 1886
Dispensationalists use a literal interpretation of the Bible, in opposition to Jesus' Spirit, and the Apostle Paul who states;
1 Corinthians 2:14 that "the natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned".
This is something historicists like to repeat with no evidence.
And at the end of the day who cares about the ECFs and what they believed, lets go by what the Bible teaches.
It is the same coming mate. Recapitulation. The book of Revelation rewinds back to the 1st century at the beginning of Rev 12.Lol
The coming in Rev 14: 14 is way, way , way , before your one coming of rev 19 on horses.
Then Jesus, when coming in the air on white horses did a "time out" , parked millions of Horses, picked up a sickle, went and sat on a cloud, and gathered the Jewish main harvest to heaven, then went back to the air and got back on His horse and continued?It is the same coming mate. Recapitulation. The book of Revelation rewinds back to the 1st century at the beginning of Rev 12.