Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
There's no point in telling him, because in his mind irresistible grace is bad because it's mentioned in tulip.

And because irresistible grace takes away his free will, only free will lives in the flesh

You have to ask yourself for someone who claims to know so much about grace, does he really ?
I believe we are able to reject the truth once we've been awakened in the same sense that Adam rejected after living in the truth. But I really don't believe many reject what they suddenly understand knowing how they were living with no hope to have what God was offering.
 
Your opinion is neither humble nor sought. Neither is it Biblical.

Shall we add you to the scores of those to whom "taken captive to do the will of the devil" means nothing?
Ah, wait. Of your own volition, you did that...

If you knew what I had desired to say, you may not have chosen such harsh words to use against me.

The LifeLongLearner who began this thread was asking a question. Typically people who ask questions are "seeking" answers. Though I am full aware that is not usually the case in these forums.

I gave the best answer I could.
I'm sorry that you didn't like it, but that would seem to be a personal issue.

As for the scripture you quoted without any context or explanation, please allow me to share with you the several preceding verses.

But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes. And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; And that they may recover themselves..."

What the verse you quoted has to do with myself, or the subject of free will, I have no idea. But the verses above are quite clear.

I'm not your enemy. And I'm sorry if I don't have several hours to get up to speed on this endless debate about free will. But at the rate its going, I sincerely hope that lifelonglearner and yourself are not too long in the tooth, as there are likely many other much more pressing matters that may require your attention.

Brotherly kindness and love being the first that come to mind.

"..beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness;
And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity.
For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
But he that lacketh* these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten* that he was purged from his old sins."
 
If you knew what I had desired to say, you may not have chosen such harsh words to use against me.

The LifeLongLearner who began this thread was asking a question. Typically people who ask questions are "seeking" answers. Though I am full aware that is not usually the case in these forums.

I gave the best answer I could.
I'm sorry that you didn't like it, but that would seem to be a personal issue.

As for the scripture you quoted without any context or explanation, please allow me to share with you the several preceding verses.

But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes. And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; And that they may recover themselves..."

What the verse you quoted has to do with myself, or the subject of free will, I have no idea. But the verses above are quite clear.

I'm not your enemy. And I'm sorry if I don't have several hours to get up to speed on this endless debate about free will. But at the rate its going, I sincerely hope that lifelonglearner and yourself are not too long in the tooth, as there are likely many other much more pressing matters that may require your attention.

Brotherly kindness and love being the first that come to mind.

"..beside this, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness;
And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity.
For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
But he that lacketh* these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten* that he was purged from his old sins."
Harsh? Wow. You are in for a rude awakening, in that case. Buckle up.

On the other hand, if you cannot handle a bit of critical thinking applied to your unBiblical assumptions, this
place may not be for you. Even Biblical thoughts get strafed on a regular basis. Lots of heretics about.


And you must be aware, since you told us the page number yourself, that the OP has been addressed ad nauseum.

But go head. Stain out a gnat to swallow a camel. Others have.

But do keep in mind that the free will of the natural man is NOT a Biblical concept.

You are of course free to believe it is if you reject Scripture as many here do.

They reject Scripture and blaspheme God, too.
 
Harsh? Wow. You are in for a rude awakening, in that case. Buckle up.

On the other hand, if you cannot handle a bit of critical thinking applied to your unBiblical assumptions, this
place may not be for you. Even Biblical thoughts get strafed on a regular basis. Lots of heretics about.


And you must be aware, since you told us the page number yourself, that the OP has been addressed ad nauseum.

But go head. Stain out a gnat to swallow a camel. Others have.

But do keep in mind that the free will of the natural man is NOT a Biblical concept.
Proverbs 27:15-16
A constant dripping on a rainy day and a contentious woman are alike— / restraining her is like holding back the wind or grasping oil with one’s right hand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
Harsh? Wow. You are in for a rude awakening, in that case. Buckle up.

On the other hand, if you cannot handle a bit of critical thinking applied to your unBiblical assumptions, this
place may not be for you. Even Biblical thoughts get strafed on a regular basis. Lots of heretics about.


And you must be aware since you told us the page number yourself, that the OP has been addressed ad nauseum.

But go head. Stain out a gnat to swallow a camel. Others have.

But do keep in mind that the free will of the natural man is NOT a Biblical concept.

I'm still waiting for you to point out what "unbiblical assumptions" you are referring too.

I believe that we do indeed have free will, but I also believe there are limits to that free will.

I made no assumptions that I am aware of, but rather stated what appeared to me as clear evidence of my claim.

Concerning heretics, well, ha ha, while I'm not in the habit of tossing that label around all willy nilly, you are "free" to do so at your pleasure, or should I say, at your "will".
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
I made no assumptions that I am aware of, but rather stated what appeared to me as clear evidence of my claim.
Volition is not evidence of the will being free. If you wish to discuss philosophical concepts,
you are of course free to do so, but this is the BIBLE discussion forum. Oh, to be sure, there
are many here who reject a plethora of verses to claim the will is free. The Pelagian heretics
will even tell you that God is not required to bring people to belief. Man is a good guy, oh, my
goodness, he is certainly NOT the creature Scripture makes him out to be, and nor is God Who
the Bible says He is according to the many heretics who love to pretend they know what they
are talking about while contradicting and denying clearly articulated Biblical facts.


Here the discussion revolves around what Scripture says of the natural man being a slave to sin and lover of darkness refusing to come into the light as a God-hater taken captive to do the will of the devil, opposed to the spiritual things of God, which he can neither receive nor comprehend, but yet we have many here contradicting and denying what Scripture says of the natural man. They claim the man of flesh, flesh within which nothing good exists, which serves the law of sin and brings forth fruit unto death, will decide with his incurably wicked heart to believe what he hears as foolishness. They are not above rewriting verses to make them say what they want even if it is Jesus' words they are butchering. In short, they have put a philosophical construct before the Truth explicitly articulated in Scripture. They ascribe to the natural man qualities, characteristics, and abilities that are true only of the spiritual man, and then to prop up this error, pretend the natural man is a carnal Christian and not the man who is not indwelt with the Holy Spirit of God.

Part of the problem is that people think that making choices equates to the will being free. They say such things as, if the will is not free, then people are puppets. This is a logical fallacy. Making mundane choices does not in any way address what the Bible teaches about man's will being enslaved to sin, blinded to the truth, unable to hear, incapable of submitting to God, a lover of darkness, refusing to come into the light, hearing the gospel as foolishness, unable to receive or comprehend the spiritual things of God, to which he is opposed and to Whom he is hostile toward while under the power and influence of the devil, as is the whole world, out of which believers have been called. Thinking your will is free simply because you can choose what colour of socks to wear or what to have for lunch, or whether to do the right or wrong things, or what book to choose out of the mountains of them available, has no bearing on the eternal fate of your soul, and mixing those things in with what the Bible teaches about the estate of fallen man is a distraction from the real issue.

This is the crux of the conversation, such as it is, for it is out of man's nature that he makes choices, and it is with the heart that one believes... the free will proponents essentially assert that the incurably wicked heart of the natural/unregenerated man is free to choose to believe that which he is not only opposed to, but that which he can neither receive/accept nor comprehend while in the flesh as are all before becoming indwelt with the Holy Spirit of God. They have the man with zero wisdom acting wise to do God's will when Scripture says that man cannot, that flesh cannot please God, that flesh serves the law of sin and brings forth fruit unto death, not life, and is unable to submit to or obey God. And their idea of wisdom is that person choosing to believe what they hear as foolishness. They reject what Jesus said about it being impossible for a bad tree to bring forth good fruit... there are none good, no, not one! Even when asked who can be saved, Jesus said that with man it was impossible, and there are other places where we are explicitly told it is not by the will of the flesh or man but by God's will that any are saved. Some philosophers and philosophy books have said man has a will that is free and that is enough for many to parrot what they hear and throw over a slew of Scriptural truths. They ascribe to the natural man qualities, characteristics, and abilities possessed only by the spiritual man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rufus
Volition is not evidence of the will being free. If you wish to discuss philosophical concepts,
you are of course free to do so, but this is the BIBLE discussion forum. Oh, to be sure, there
are many here who reject a plethora of verses to claim the will is free. The Pelagian heretics
will even tell you that God is not required to bring people to belief. Man is a good guy, oh, my
goodness, he is certainly NOT the creature Scripture makes him out to be, and nor is God Who
the Bible says He is according to the many heretics who love to pretend they know what they
are talking about while contradicting and denying clearly articulated Biblical facts.


Here the discussion revolves around what Scripture says of the natural man being a slave to sin and lover of darkness refusing to come into the light as a God-hater taken captive to do the will of the devil, opposed to the spiritual things of God, which he can neither receive nor comprehend, but yet we have many here contradicting and denying what Scripture says of the natural man. They claim the man of flesh, flesh within which nothing good exists, which serves the law of sin and brings forth fruit unto death, will decide with his incurably wicked heart to believe what he hears as foolishness. They are not above rewriting verses to make them say what they want even if it is Jesus' words they are butchering. In short, they have put a philosophical construct before the Truth explicitly articulated in Scripture. They ascribe to the natural man qualities, characteristics, and abilities that are true only of the spiritual man, and then to prop up this error, pretend the natural man is a carnal Christian and not the man who is not indwelt with the Holy Spirit of God.

Part of the problem is that people think that making choices equates to the will being free. They say such things as, if the will is not free, then people are puppets. This is a logical fallacy. Making mundane choices does not in any way address what the Bible teaches about man's will being enslaved to sin, blinded to the truth, unable to hear, incapable of submitting to God, a lover of darkness, refusing to come into the light, hearing the gospel as foolishness, unable to receive or comprehend the spiritual things of God, to which he is opposed and to Whom he is hostile toward while under the power and influence of the devil, as is the whole world, out of which believers have been called. Thinking your will is free simply because you can choose what colour of socks to wear or what to have for lunch, or whether to do the right or wrong things, or what book to choose out of the mountains of them available, has no bearing on the eternal fate of your soul, and mixing those things in with what the Bible teaches about the estate of fallen man is a distraction from the real issue.

This is the crux of the conversation, such as it is, for it is out of man's nature that he makes choices, and it is with the heart that one believes... the free will proponents essentially assert that the incurably wicked heart of the natural/unregenerated man is free to choose to believe that which he is not only opposed to, but that which he can neither receive/accept nor comprehend while in the flesh as are all before becoming indwelt with the Holy Spirit of God. They have the man with zero wisdom acting wise to do God's will when Scripture says that man cannot, that flesh cannot please God, that flesh serves the law of sin and brings forth fruit unto death, not life, and is unable to submit to or obey God. And their idea of wisdom is that person choosing to believe what they hear as foolishness. They reject what Jesus said about it being impossible for a bad tree to bring forth good fruit... there are none good, no, not one! Even when asked who can be saved, Jesus said that with man it was impossible, and there are other places where we are explicitly told it is not by the will of the flesh or man but by God's will that any are saved. Some philosophers and philosophy books have said man has a will that is free and that is enough for many to parrot what they hear and throw over a slew of Scriptural truths. They ascribe to the natural man qualities, characteristics, and abilities possessed only by the spiritual man.
Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and You shall be saved....

Same for YOU and same for ME......Not just for YOU.
 
Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and You shall be saved....

Same for YOU and same for ME......Not just for YOU.
Try being honest for a change, and stop misrepresenting. Can you?
I seriously wonder if it is possible. I have seen zero evidence for it so far.


You equate enabling with being forced. You idolize your will to cast shade on God.

How do you feel about another's fabrication of temporary enablement
so the flesh can do what Scripture says it cannot? Pretty lame, huh?


Why not just believe what the Bible says?
 
Why would there be joy over one sinner who repents if God's grace is irresistible.
They are not joyful due to the sinner's action, but are speechless as to the Glory of God. A God who can take a worthless, lowdown, corrupted, worm of a creature and bring them to newness of life in Christ. To God be the Glory!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cameron143
For those saying God doesn't force a person to be saved even though the belief of God's Sovereign choice and will is the driving force. Are you then saying through Irresistible Grace that God (seduces, convinces, persuades) a person to just automatically release their will and submit themselves to Calling from God?
 
Try being honest for a change, and stop misrepresenting. Can you?
I seriously wonder if it is possible. I have seen zero evidence for it so far.


You equate enabling with being forced. You idolize your will to cast shade on God.

How do you feel about another's fabrication of temporary enablement
so the flesh can do what Scripture says it cannot? Pretty lame, huh?


Why not just believe what the Bible says?
Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved.....


For You and for me.....Not just for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you shall be saved.....


For You and for me.....Not just for you.
The main difference between a reformed and non reformed person seems to be that the reformed are a humble people, not giving themselves credit for becoming a people of God. The Free Willies, on the other hand, have an elevated view of the importance of their supposed contribution to becoming saved. . . .
 
If God doesn't force someone to be saved, or He doesn't seduce, persuade, convinces someone to be saved. Are you then saying that God places the things of life in your path that just overwhelm you to the point you just are ready whenever God calls a person to Salvation?
 
The main difference between a reformed and non reformed person seems to be that the reformed are a humble people, not giving themselves credit for becoming a people of God. The Free Willies, on the other hand, have an elevated view of the importance of their supposed contribution to becoming saved. . . .
Oh, yes. A humble people.

Salvation is for you, not for us......Think a bit before you post.
 
Interesting, some say that God doesn't force people to be saved even though their belief statements indicate that but yet they are unable to explain how God does it.
 
"Satan laughing spreads his wings"
Ozzy

I'll let you folks get back to your fun.

There is nothing in this endless debate that glorifies Christ as far as I can tell.

I'm trying very hard to be kind and not pass judgment.

But really, who cares? Your doctrines, your dogmas, your strongly held scripturally supported beliefs, whatever, whatever you call them, and however highly you may value your own opinions, it doesn't matter which side you're on, none of this endless strife does one single thing to advance or expand the Kingdom of God, not one iota.

Its a very sad thing to witness, and it surely grieves the Holy Spirit.

But what do I know, I guess my comments border on heresy for some of you, which has already been implied by my loving sister magenta.

Peace
 
The main difference between a reformed and non reformed person seems to be that the reformed are a humble people, not giving themselves credit for becoming a people of God. The Free Willies, on the other hand, have an elevated view of the importance of their supposed contribution to becoming saved. . . .

Maybe you can point out all the humbles in the last 20 pages or so. Just a bunch of insults and personal attacks.
 
There are people here who believe they can of their own free will choose God without His help and that is a Pelagian heretic, [QUOTE]
And you have not met ONE on this thread.

John 16
8And He, when He comes, will convict the world regarding sin, and righteousness, and judgment: 9regarding sin, because they do not believe in Me;


2 Cor 6:2
For He says: “In an acceptable time I have heard you, And in the day of salvation I have helped you.” Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
Oh, yes. A humble people.

Salvation is for you, not for us......Think a bit before you post.
That is not what I wrote. It is not a you vs me issue. Salvation is given by God to those of His choosing. I just hope that we can all agree on this important issue.
Those who believe they are saved because [they did this or they did that] should be the ones who stop and consider what they are saying. . . .
 
"Satan laughing spreads his wings"
Ozzy

I'll let you folks get back to your fun.

There is nothing in this endless debate that glorifies Christ as far as I can tell.

I'm trying very hard to be kind and not pass judgment.

But really, who cares? Your doctrines, your dogmas, your strongly held scripturally supported beliefs, whatever, whatever you call them, and however highly you may value your own opinions, it doesn't matter which side you're on, none of this endless strife does one single thing to advance or expand the Kingdom of God, not one iota.

Its a very sad thing to witness, and it surely grieves the Holy Spirit.

But what do I know, I guess my comments border on heresy for some of you, which has already been implied by my loving sister magenta.

Peace
I get it. You criticize me "for the scripture you quoted without any context or explanation" and then
criticize me when I give context and explanation. There is just no getting along with some people.


Bye!

1-Corinthians11.gif