That would be the faith of Jesus Christ.
Galatians 2:20
I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
It only sounds like a contradiction to those who teach salvation by faith AND works. We are saved through faith in Jesus Christ alone. Saved through faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8,9) Hence, faith and not faith and works. Faith (rightly understood) in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. Works follow genuine faith (Ephesians 2:8-10) but not a bare prefession of faith. (James 2:14) I'm not confused at all but prior to my conversion several years ago while still attending the Roman Catholic church, I was very confused when I still trusted in works for salvation and not in Jesus Christ alone. Reformed theology? Usually the boogeyman label is Calvinist.You just contradicted yourself. On on hand you say it's faith alone, and then you claim an "empty profession of faith/dead faith that remains "alone" - barren of works. (James 2:14)" This is a great example of how followers of reformed theology are confused and are to be ignored.
Here is the order. Made alive together with Christ/saved by grace through faith, not works, then we become His workmanship created in Christ Jesus UNTO/FOR good works. (Ephesians 2:5-10)Ephesians 2:10
For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
God certainly has prepared beforehand that believers walk in good works, exhibiting the fruit of the Spirit. All genuine believers are fruitful but not all are equally fruitful. (Matthew 13:23)The fact of the matter is God has ordained His people to walk in good works, but these would be works of the Holy Spirit thru us as we submit ourselves unto the Lord walking with Him bearing fruit.
I don't believe so. Scripture says that faith without works is a dead faith.Does the phrase, "saved by faith" equivalent to the term, "saved by faith alone"?
Right on target for sure.It only sounds like a contradiction to those who teach salvation by faith AND works. We are saved through faith in Jesus Christ alone. Saved through faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8,9) Hence, faith and not faith and works. Faith (rightly understood) in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. Works follow genuine faith (Ephesians 2:8-10) but not a bare prefession of faith. (James 2:14) I'm not confused at all but prior to my conversion several years ago while still attending the Roman Catholic church, I was very confused when I still trusted in works for salvation and not in Jesus Christ alone. Reformed theology? Usually the boogeyman label is Calvinist.
Here is the order. Made alive together with Christ/saved by grace through faith, not works, then we become His workmanship created in Christ Jesus UNTO/FOR good works. (Ephesians 2:5-10)
God certainly has prepared beforehand that believers walk in good works, exhibiting the fruit of the Spirit. All genuine believers are fruitful but not all are equally fruitful. (Matthew 13:23)
Yeah, people going to hell is apparently pretty funny to some people
Romans 8:28 And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose."God used Zipporah"?
Was Zipporah acting on her own will just as Moses was acting on his own will?
I believe Paul is referring to the faith of Christ
It only sounds like a contradiction to those who teach salvation by faith AND works. We are saved through faith in Jesus Christ alone. Saved through faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8,9) Hence, faith and not faith and works. Faith (rightly understood) in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. Works follow genuine faith (Ephesians 2:8-10) but not a bare prefession of faith. (James 2:14) I'm not confused at all but prior to my conversion several years ago while still attending the Roman Catholic church, I was very confused when I still trusted in works for salvation and not in Jesus Christ alone. Reformed theology? Usually the boogeyman label is Calvinist.
God certainly has prepared beforehand that believers walk in good works, exhibiting the fruit of the Spirit. All genuine believers are fruitful but not all are equally fruitful. (Matthew 13:23)
I don't believe so. Scripture says that faith without works is a dead faith.
Seriously Stan - that’s how you read my comment? I was just noting how unusual it was to see death phrased as ‘croaking’ (it's been a while since I've heard that phrasing) and someone's reported revelation said to rather be what it was speculated to be, especially in a theological thread.
Provide one piece of scripture where it states that Jesus laughed at something.Se
The Lord laughs at death as it has no power of Him and it has no power over me either
Luther is not the author of Ephesians 2;8-9When Luther pinned these words, the 5 sola statements, his intent was make a point of the word alone. So that faith for example isnt muddled with anything else, particularly works.
No, I do not do or say what your inability to comprehend asserts. Not breaking the law does notYou make a distinction between walking in the spirit and walking according to the spirit, which I don't. Walking according to the spirit is obeying the word of God. You apparently only see it as something that is felt.
He is essentially saying that anyone who refrains from breaking the law for whatever reason is saved.Nope. There is an earthly sorrow as well as a godly sorrow.
Psalm 37:13Provide one piece of scripture where it states that Jesus laughed at something.
the two criminals on the cross weren't baptized, unless you mean holy spirit baptism.[/QUOT 9That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
the two criminals on the cross weren't baptized, unless you mean holy spirit baptism.
Why then did John baptise?REPOST
The thief was forgiven by Christ as he forgave others while alive, under the OT! Baptism wasn't a requirement of salvation until Christ died, at which poitgd NT began. Read Hebrews 9:16-17
16For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. 17For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.
It's a false argument trying to relate the thief on the cross with baptism.
OK, you did indeed provide scripture that the Lord Jesus laughed. Good job.Psalm 37:13
the Lord laughs at the wicked, for he sees that his day is coming
Psalm 2:4
He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.
Jesus does as His Father does so the Lord be laughing!
View attachment 281460
OK, you did indeed provide scripture that the Lord Jesus laughed. Good job.
Why then did John baptise?
Point is if the thief was saved before baptism was instituted, was it needed for salvation? Evidently faith alone was enough for the thief. But you knew the point I was making didnt you?IF you actually knew the Word of the Lord you would know Jesus only does and says what the Father does and says:
John 5:19
Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.
It's high time to grow up and put away childish things!
Because the Lord led him to do so.
I am fully aware that Jesus only does the things that the Father wants to accomplish. What makes you think that I didn't know this?IF you actually knew the Word of the Lord you would know Jesus only does and says what the Father does and says:
John 5:19
Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.
It's high time to grow up and put away childish things!
Because the Lord led him to do so.
Point is if the thief was saved before baptism was instituted, was it needed for salvation?
We're through here. Good riddance.