Owens has lost her blasted mind. She's gone down the rabbit hole and isn't coming back. I wouldn't take a thing she says seriously. Though it's not a legal document, I was looking through my baby book when I was younger. I noticed something and I ran to my mother and asked why my birth tag said " Hi I Am A Boy" with boy marked out and girl written under it. She said that they had run out of tags because so many girls were being born at that time. If I was in office right now, Owens would take that as proof of her conspiracy theories. That girl is nuttier than squirrel poo.
Charlie Kirk - so what now ?
- Thread starter the_seeker
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
Owens has lost her blasted mind. She's gone down the rabbit hole and isn't coming back. I wouldn't take a thing she says seriously. Though it's not a legal document, I was looking through my baby book when I was younger. I noticed something and I ran to my mother and asked why my birth tag said " Hi I Am A Boy" with boy marked out and girl written under it. She said that they had run out of tags because so many girls were being born at that time. If I was in office right now, Owens would take that as proof of her conspiracy theories. That girl is nuttier than squirrel poo.
No one is posting anything from Candace.
But concerning this "nuttier than squirrel poo" it hit me. Why would hackers go in and change the name and gender of Brigette's tax forms?
Suppose they did that with Melania. They would be mocked, ridiculed, and Trump would write a few mean tweets, but other than that no one would blink an eye. Your story makes sense, but for hackers to hack into tax forms to do this? That makes no sense. We have watched them go after Trump every which way there is, but they didn't try to say that Melania is a man, they didn't try to hack some document to say that the first lady has a different name. That is nuttier than squirrel poo.
unless they settle out of court, it's going to come down to a simple DNA test in court.
Yep, that is the attitude that is a red flag to me, presumption of innocence works both ways.
Just a few Candace Owens quotes -
"For clarity, if Qatar ever offers me $120,000/month to say what I already believe about Israel, I will be accepting. Sounds like the best deal ever tbh."
"Today on the show I reveal more private messages from Charlie Kirk plus world exclusive footage from 9/10." (releasing her dead "friends'" private messages - this is disgusting.)
"Should I release more of the text chain tomorrow?" (teasing this like it's entertainment and still milking that ad revenue from her "friend's" murder)
"“I'm telling you, I don't even think people are human. Like, I look at Elon Musk and Sam Altman and Peter Thiel, and I'm pretty sure they're hybrid."
"With all we have crowdsourced, it looks like a decision to murder Charlie Kirk in Utah was made around July 18th. A military meeting with foreign leaders took place on July 20th on U.S soil. The plane flew into Provo direct from France on September 4th and stayed until just after Charlie was assassinated— flying out to Wilmington on that day....
(later update of her false info) ...Okay! I stand corrected on the departure time of the Egyptian Air Force plane. It left just BEFORE Charlie was assassinated, not AFTER on 9/10. So, still completely abnormal and seems pretty obviously related to Charlie’s assassination given the plane’s past flight activity."
She has already exposed herself as a grifter.
Australia won't even let her into their country.
how much of a con artist does a person have to be to get banned from a whole country?
I don't put stock in anything Australia does, but that made me laugh.
I don't know why anyone ever took Owens as anything but a YouTube hack.
Now,she's losing her mind. Claiming Musk and are others are hybrids. Saying,she doesn't think they'd bleed if they were stabbed. Instead a battery would likely fall out.
And what she's doing with the Charlie communications to her is pathetic. That's not a friend. That's an opportunist.
Now,she's losing her mind. Claiming Musk and are others are hybrids. Saying,she doesn't think they'd bleed if they were stabbed. Instead a battery would likely fall out.
And what she's doing with the Charlie communications to her is pathetic. That's not a friend. That's an opportunist.
What is pathetic is you calling me an unbeliever when you know nothing about me. And saying I'm trying to insult Charlie Kirk? You need to look up what projection is, and then learn to stop projecting.
Pretty sure a true friend wouldn't let her friend's public assassination be attributed to a patsy while the real killer or killers walk free. Strange that the wife would, in my opinion. One would expect the wife's love to be truer and greater, but we know from history that this is not always the case.
Lol. Start another thread if you want to debate that. People can express opinions which are separate to what they report as fact.
I don't believe a man can ever become a woman, nor do I support pedophilia (as when a 30+ year old teacher starts grooming a 14 year old) so I'm hoping Candice wins this case. It's really a test of the validity of the court, but I doubt Brigitte will take it that far. You do know that Brigitte is recorded as a man on his French tax returns? He claims this was done by a hacker. Lol.
You hit the nail on the head. What benefit for the hackers? Why would they change Brigitte's gender on the tax forms? Lol. Don't hackers steal money or commit fraud to their own benefit or the benefit of their sponsors, rather than change personal details on tax forms?
The facts align better with Brigitte being born a man than hackers changing his gender on his tax form before Candace even brought his transgenderism to public light.
@ZNP -
Charlesiii wrote the following -
"Pretty sure a true friend wouldn't let her friend's public assassination be attributed to a patsy while the real killer or killers walk free. Strange that the wife would, in my opinion. One would expect the wife's love to be truer and greater, but we know from history that this is not always the case."
You gave this post a 'useful'. Do you agree with that statement or find it useful that Erika Kirk's love was not 'true and great' because she's not following conspiracy theories? Just curious.
Charlesiii wrote the following -
"Pretty sure a true friend wouldn't let her friend's public assassination be attributed to a patsy while the real killer or killers walk free. Strange that the wife would, in my opinion. One would expect the wife's love to be truer and greater, but we know from history that this is not always the case."
You gave this post a 'useful'. Do you agree with that statement or find it useful that Erika Kirk's love was not 'true and great' because she's not following conspiracy theories? Just curious.
I find it useful to question the official narrative. I find it useful that we want to be sure we are finding the true killer and what truly took place and not simply accept some patsy handed to us.
I have no idea about the love between Charlie and Erika.
However, she is not simply a grieving widow, she is also the new CEO of Turning Point USA. I agree with those taking issue of anyone harassing someone who is grieving for the loss of a loved one. That is simply wrong. I also agree with those who want to look at the resume of the new CEO, telling them they can't, well that is simply wrong too.
YouTuber Stacy Prince pretty much summed it up about this
it's been taken down by YouTube for some reason.
to Cliff note, Candice Owens believes that some other organization was responsible for Charlie Kirk's death so at least in her own delusional mind, she's willing to put her husband and her family at risk over another man.
she's for the streets
I think the 'logic' goes something like this -
1. CK was murdered by a US agency, US military, a foreign gov't, aliens from space, or an elite squad of ninja cats,. Maybe it's all of them. CO & company are on the case and working it all out for us. Tune in to her $how to find out.
2. For 1. to be true, actual evidence must be rejected and denied.
3. If CK's wife and friends are not willing to deny the evidence and believe the conspiracy, then they never loved CK.
4. If they never loved CK, then they could be complicit in his murder - updated theory coming soon.
- Status