OK. No church is promised perpetuity.
What about the members of that church?
OK. No church is promised perpetuity.
They are saved or unsaved. When churches die, those who are saved have already left as the apostasy mounts.What about the members of that church?
`
Nearly all churches believe that the gifts and ministries of the Holy Spirit.
Came to an end after the age of the apostles ended.
Here is one list for you to check to see if you are a traditional church member.
1 Corinthians 12:7-11
But to each one is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good. For to one is given
the word of wisdom through the Spirit, and to another the word of knowledge according to the same Spirit;
to another faith by the same Spirit, and to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit, and to another
the effecting of miracles, and to another prophecy, and to another the distinguishing of spirits,
to another various kinds of tongues, and to another the interpretation of tongues. But one and
the same Spirit works all these things, distributing to each one individually just as He wills.
If you agree that the work of the Holy Spirit never changes then you obey all the commandments
of the Lord. If you omit a commandment such as 1 Corinthians 14:37 then, you are a traditional
church member. You don't follow Sola Scripture.
That response is polished rhetoric — but it’s theologically inconsistent and grammatically flawed in light of Peter’s own wording.
Notice carefully how Peter structures his statement — he’s distinguishing the figure from the reality, not merging them.
“The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us — not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God — by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.” (1 Peter 3:21 KJV)
If baptism itself were the saving act, Peter wouldn’t have immediately qualified it with “not the putting away of the filth of the flesh.”
That phrase rules out the physical water as the saving means.
Instead, the saving reality is “by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.”
The Greek term antitupos (“antitype”) literally means corresponding figure — the thing that represents something greater.
Noah’s family was saved from judgment by being in the ark, not by the water that brought judgment on the world.
Likewise, believers are saved by being in Christ, not by the water that symbolizes that union.
Your statement that spiritual circumcision is “contingent upon” water baptism reverses Paul’s teaching in Colossians 2:11–12.
There, Paul explicitly says this “circumcision made without hands” is the work of God, not of man — and that the saving element is faith in the operation of God, not the act of immersion.
So baptism signifies our appeal to God; it doesn’t cause the new birth.
The saving power rests in Christ’s resurrection, received by faith, not by ritual.
“Ye are complete in Him… buried with Him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with Him through the faith of the operation of God.” (Col 2:10-12 KJV)I can tell you really haven't read 90% of what I've responded to you with.Grace and peace in Christ.
At this point, I honestly feel pity for ChristRoseFromTheDead, not anger.I pray you find true peace in Christ, because the theology you’re holding to is deeply confused and far from the plain teaching of Scripture.
Romans 6:3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
1 Peter 3:21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:
Romans 6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
They go together.
"Noah’s family was saved from judgment by being in the ark, not by the water that brought judgment on the world."
1 Peter 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
Acts 2:41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.
Noah family, 8 SOULS WERE SAVED BY WATER.
The ones who was responsible for putting JESUS on the cross was the first ones reborn with NT rules, LOOK THEY GLADLY RECEIVED HIS WORD AND WERE BAPTIZED. Three THOUSAND souls were added.
Something HAPPENS IN THE WATER, so HIS word is not wrong.
I’m not claiming to know everything—far from it. But Scripture commands believers to “contend earnestly for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 1:3). When I correct theological error, it’s not out of pride, but out of love for truth and concern for those who may be led astray. True humility doesn’t mean staying silent when God’s Word is being twisted; it means submitting our opinions to what Scripture actually says.Are you humble? Or just know everything and everyone else is wrong, yea including JESUS.
That’s a classic case of taking “saved by water” out of its typological context — confusing the symbol with the substance.
You’re overlooking Peter’s own clarification in the same verse — “not the putting away of the filth of the flesh.” The very line you quote (1 Peter 3:21) explicitly rules out the physical water as the saving agent. The floodwaters didn’t save Noah; they brought judgment. It was being in the ark that saved him — the ark being the antitype of Christ (1 Peter 3:20–21).
Likewise, Romans 6 isn’t teaching that water unites us to Christ’s death, but that faith does — and baptism is the outward confession of that inward reality. Paul and Peter both tie salvation to “the faith of the operation of God” and “the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (Col. 2:12; 1 Peter 3:21), not to the act of immersion itself. Something happens through faith in Christ, not in the water.
Grace and Peace
That’s a classic case of taking “saved by water” out of its typological context — confusing the symbol with the substance.
You’re overlooking Peter’s own clarification in the same verse — “not the putting away of the filth of the flesh.” The very line you quote (1 Peter 3:21) explicitly rules out the physical water as the saving agent. The floodwaters didn’t save Noah; they brought judgment. It was being in the ark that saved him — the ark being the antitype of Christ (1 Peter 3:20–21).
Likewise, Romans 6 isn’t teaching that water unites us to Christ’s death, but that faith does — and baptism is the outward confession of that inward reality. Paul and Peter both tie salvation to “the faith of the operation of God” and “the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (Col. 2:12; 1 Peter 3:21), not to the act of immersion itself. Something happens through faith in Christ, not in the water.
Grace and Peace
I’m not claiming to know everything—far from it. But Scripture commands believers to “contend earnestly for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 1:3). When I correct theological error, it’s not out of pride, but out of love for truth and concern for those who may be led astray. True humility doesn’t mean staying silent when God’s Word is being twisted; it means submitting our opinions to what Scripture actually says.
Grace and Peace
I guess you don't realize, when we read HIS word and you change it then you know more then JESUS does so you do know everything.
You quote scripture don't don't follow it.
You don't need to correct JESUS has it all under control.
So who is it that is being led astray?
You are the one twisting GOD'S word!!!!!!!
Are you open to other scriputre?Brother, baptism is indeed an act of faith — but Scripture never teaches that the Holy Spirit is given because of the water itself. The Spirit is given through faith in Christ, and baptism follows as a public expression of that faith.
Peter himself clarifies this later:
“While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word… Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?” (Acts 10:44–47, KJV)
That passage shows clearly that the Spirit was given before water baptism — not after. Peter saw that faith alone had brought salvation and the indwelling Spirit.
Baptism, then, doesn’t cause regeneration; it confesses it. It’s a testimony of what God has already done in the heart.
“In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise.” (Ephesians 1:13, KJV)
So yes — we are baptized in faith, but not to get the Spirit. We are baptized because we already have Him.
Grace and Peace
Again, we will find out in heaven whose understanding of GW is least twisted or most correct,
so we might as well place our bets and move on to other topics, striving to be more agreeable,
so as not to cause division in the body of Christ (Rom. 16:17, 1Cor. 1:10, 11:17-19, 12:25, Eph. 4:4).
Again, we will find out in heaven whose understanding of GW is least twisted or most correct,
so we might as well place our bets and move on to other topics, striving to be more agreeable,
so as not to cause division in the body of Christ (Rom. 16:17, 1Cor. 1:10, 11:17-19, 12:25, Eph. 4:4).
How does that change why the Hebrews were falling into apostasy?
Yet, Paul was discussing the rewards to the Corinthians for their works.
Dude, if we don't use HIS WORD AS OUR FOUNDATION TODAY WE HAVE NO FOUNDATION.
WAIT UNTIL WE GET TO HEAVEN, IT WILL BE TO LATE, WE HAVE HIS WORD NOW, TODAY.
We either follow JESUS and HIS WORD.
Or Satan's twisted version of it.
Do you still follow your own worldly wisdom or JESUS?
You pick.
I still doubt your version is untwisted.
Twisted or untwisted?