The Holy Spirit is my pastor. How about you?
So are you saying that you've never been to church and listened to what is taught there?
The Holy Spirit is my pastor. How about you?
Then perhaps it demonstrates that he got it from someone else who read it.The fact that he hasn't read it demonstrates that his understanding didn't come from it.
You know his pastor? Wow.You don't have to have ever read it. Your pastor did in seminary
You know his pastor? Wow.
Actually it's the Calvinistic distortions and misapprehensions that we reject.I imagine no such thing. I post the proof texts often and they are rejected, contradicted, and denied, even by you.
Free willers have even been known to rewrite the words of Jesus to make them fit their presups.
They refuse to accept what Scripture says in a multitude of places.
Or...he simply read scripture.Then perhaps it demonstrates that he got it from someone else who read it.
What lies have you adopted from your false teachers?So are you saying that you've never been to church and listened to what is taught there?
The Bible alone is the root of my religion. Unfortunately, you don't comprehend enough of it to realize/understand its message.
So are you saying that you've never been to church and listened to what is taught there?
The fact that he hasn't read it demonstrates that his understanding didn't come from it.
Oh really? What part of the Bible would you like to discuss systematically so we can see whether it supports your religion?
Doesn't follow that they would necessarily teach from it. You are shady.I think there's a very high likelihood that any pastor who attended seminary has read it
[Tit 3:5-6 KJV] 5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing
of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; 6 Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;
If an individual independently comes to a set of beliefs, the history of their beliefs is themselves.Not at all. Many people are ignorant of the history of their beliefs.
"Systematically" is anathema to the Bible tweet Barbies and Bible tweet Kens around here. To be avoided like the plague.
Not necessarily. Many people are ignorant of the history of their beliefs.
Free willers rely heavily on logical fallacies.If an individual independently comes to a set of beliefs, the history of their beliefs is themselves.
If an individual independently comes to a set of beliefs, the history of their beliefs is themselves.
Yes, as we discovered the last time they took me up on the offer to study their pet tweets in context.
(I put the results on our website in Lesson 11.)
I'm not "many people"