Really?? I have not seen that one. I guess "humble" is not a word I naturally associate with @Rufus![]()
You also don't naturally associate it with Jesus, along with His highly exalted status of Federal Headship over God's elect.
Really?? I have not seen that one. I guess "humble" is not a word I naturally associate with @Rufus![]()
That is a non-answer.I have explained this often. All grace comes through, in and by Christ, who himself was a meek, mild, lowly, humble servant of God AND also my Federal Head. Therefore, God sees all his elect as being as righteous, holy and good as Christ himself. How else could God see his chosen people since Jesus atoned for and forgave all the elect's sins?
Nope that would make it by man's work, instead, it comes as a byproduct of salvation. And that too has been posted a thousand times.
[2Pe 1:1 KJV] 1 Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ:
Behavior is doctrine in action.
He didn't. God did.
From both posts it would almost and I am trying to give the benefit of the doubt here but the both posts almost seems to be saying to me that even though John, Peter, Paul wrote the text they really didn't understand the text when they explained it to their Disciples because the Disciples say they were instructed it meant Free Will and that Jesus died for both the saved and those who rejected Him?
But the idea that you both could think John, Peter, and Paul would be so IGNORANT of what they wrote and taught just really shines a great light on just how far the Reformed will go to spread their maligned Doctrine. They will go so far as to say the very men who wrote the majority of the New Testament didn't have a clue about any of it.
Honestly, that's hard to believe they didn't understand. It really seems that they taught their Disciples correctly and their Disciples documented truthfully what they were taught by John, Peter, and Paul.
A crumb sweeper.
God gives Grace to the humble.
It is the Lord Himself who said believe in His Son so "believing" is meant to be a work of man
How? Grace?
Completely agree.It is not a one shot deal. There is pre-salvation grace. And, post salvation grace.
Pre-salvation grace must be commissioned by God to get an unregenerated soul into a position to be made able to believe.
God does the initiation in that case.
But, look at King Saul.
He started off humble.
Later, became insanely proud and died the sin onto death.
Why the sin onto death?
Saul after regeneration was responsible for humbling himself before God.
Saul refused, and died a horrific death.
Not sure I understand the question. Can you rephrase?How come it does not also happen to the humble, like it seems so much to happen to the proud?
You forgot to add what they teach is true [unlike us FWers]![]()
Completely agree.
This is Just a little exercise to show yet another contradiction in their theory.
I used to work with a Muslim, and we had some discussions about various things.
I asked him how he could know he pleases Allah.
His answer?
"I am so humble."
He thought he was.
Not sure I understand the question. Can you rephrase?
I used to work with a Muslim, and we had some discussions about various things.
I asked him how he could know he pleases Allah.
His answer?
"I am so humble."
He thought he was.
Kroogz said:
@Rufus has repeatedly said it was his humbleness, then he received Grace.
I still have not received an answer of how he humbled his natural man to receive Grace.