Who told you what to do because generally whenever we feel the Holy Ghost urging us to do something we typically do it.Why are we told to do what is right with God, yet we continue to sin?
Who told you what to do because generally whenever we feel the Holy Ghost urging us to do something we typically do it.Why are we told to do what is right with God, yet we continue to sin?
Why are we told to do what is right with God, yet we continue to sin?
Hmmm, not if you ask him.He does not know the truth.
He may have a knowledge of the truth only.
Are we told to not covet, boast, lust, envy, etc …..............?Who told you what to do because generally whenever we feel the Holy Ghost urging us to do something we typically do it.
Hmmm, not if you ask him.
What do you mean, if true? You said a very similar thing just yesterday or theIf true, then why should we be using an undefinable phrase and arguing about something no one agrees on the meaning of?
From one side it's obviously being used pejoratively and as nothing more than a cuss word. But that seems to be the enjoyable part - using words and phrases open to whatever definition one chooses at any given time.
The problem is that it may be one of the most important concepts in the Bible and one of the main things that God designed into us to make us in His likeness.
In this light it makes sense that it is attacked as it is.
There is much to say about this, as many suggestions have been made aware already on as to why and how people can respond.Exactly, why does God give us commands if we do not have the ability to execute it.
Why are we told to do what is right with God, yet we continue to sin?
Ah. Did you circumcise your own heart then, and your ears as well? Tell me how you did that.Exactly, why does God give us commands if we do not have the ability to execute it.
Well....to answer your questions, you could start with using the search function on your online Bible for starters....Why are we told to do what is right with God, yet we continue to sin?
Choosing Life wasn't part of the Law or Commandments that were designed to show why we need God. Choosing Life is choosing Life over Death and that is within everyone's ability to do.Are we told to not covet, boast, lust, envy, etc …..............?
Are these commands not difficult or impossible to keep?
I was replying to a post which insinuated that God would not ask us to do somethin that we are unable to do!
I agree with that for many reasons, of course where all born with some intelligenceYou are approaching this from an entirely different perspective than others talking and I have to agree with you. God created us for His good pleasure and our lives are not our own. But we do have the ability to say no if one could be that dumb!
Because what's being defined is an Oxford dictionary meaning.If true, then why should we be using an undefinable phrase and arguing about something no one agrees on the meaning of?
From one side it's obviously being used pejoratively and as nothing more than a cuss word. But that seems to be the enjoyable part - using words and phrases open to whatever definition one chooses at any given time.
The problem is that it may be one of the most important concepts in the Bible and one of the main things that God designed into us to make us in His likeness.
In this light it makes sense that it is attacked as it is.
Ah. Did you circumcise your own heart then, and your ears as well? Tell me how you did that.
I've explained already the only will that I see being free is God'sYou sound like you know what it means, yet you say it's undefined.
Why don't you give us what you think is the proper definition of "freewill"?
And....Well....to answer your questions, you could start with using the search function on your online Bible for starters....
[Mat 26:41 KJV]
Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed [is] willing, but the flesh [is] weak.
[Mar 14:38 KJV]
Watch ye and pray, lest ye enter into temptation. The spirit truly [is] ready, but the flesh [is] weak.
[Rom 8:3 KJV]
For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
************************************************************************************
All of this lends credence to what @Genez is postulating BTW.
But I have yet to unpack everything to agree or disagree in part or in whole.
Part of the issue here is defining what "free will" is. If someone has had any schooling or done much of any reading in philosophy let alone theology based back in the early church fathers and such, then they are likely dealing with and thinking of free will in terms of philosophy. It's thus a typical confused and opinionated mess. IMO it's not worth dealing with the terminology when we can just as easily drop "free" and speak of human will, volition, choice, etc., and do our best to keep the philosophy out of the discussion.
If you can show what you say you can in and from the Bible, why not just do so?
Oooooppppssss....Ah. Did you circumcise your own heart then, and your ears as well? Tell me how you did that.
I don't think it's wise to argue about something being taken so personal.For starters ...
God saved your soul.
Not your body.
What is intrinsically depraved can not be redeemed.
The body is doomed to perish.
Our resurrection body may look like how we are now (but perfect),
but that body essence will have everlasting life and will not be the same structure.
If man were TOTALLY depraved?
Not simply functioning in total depravity?
Then God could not redeem the soul.
The soul born enslaved in the prison of depraved flesh.
Like a person who had too much to drink,
the soul can not do what is righteous and good,
because the fallen flesh is like being drunk, which influences the soul in a bad way.
Grace sobers up the person to have the soul made able to think clearly enough to understand the Gospel.
Then the solul chooses freely.
Now?
If that soul takes the way that the fallen angels did?
Then that soul is accountable and condemnable.
That is why we can not be saved without grace.
Grace does not save automatically!
Grace makes what was impossible to become possible!
That is why those sent to the Lake of Fire will be without excuse.
For they, like Satan and his angels, make their choice, not fof sin.
But for Evil!
There is a difference.
Jesus died for the sins of the world.
He did not die for Evil.
He would have had to reject himself to bear evil on the Cross.
This is only a foundational understanding.
Can't answer it all on one page.
grace and peace .....