What if the drowning person sunk for the third time in the water?
Then that person would be in the lake of fire. While a man has breath, he has hope.
What if the drowning person sunk for the third time in the water?
So life is imparted in hearing yes?You do not circumcise dead male babies.
It must be alive!
And, one must first be first born, then wait for eight days to be circumcised.
Lazarus is dead 4 days and residing in a tomb. Jesus raises him from the dead by calling him forth. Was Lazarus given life, heard the words of Jesus, and came forth, or, did he hear the words, come to life, and come forth?
I didn't say grace will only save. For someone who gets upset when they believe someone has taken their words out of context, I would think you would be a little more careful.But it can go that far (hearing) and no further, Romans 1 proves that. As long as you keep insisting that grace must save and only save, you will never understand what is being said to you.
So you don't answer my question, but I should?Which way do you see it?
I didn't say grace will only save. For someone who gets upset when they believe someone has taken their words out of context, I would think you would be a little more careful.
You FWers project a lot, don't you? If anyone has a superiority complex on steroids it you and you comrades. You're totally superior to God. You can cure your own blindness. You can raise yourself from the dead. You have the power to change your own immutable nature, etc. You guys fancy yourselves as real superheroes, don't you?![]()
What part of Romans 1 are you referring to?It is exactly what you said.
Quote: "Except grace doesn't simply allow hearing; it saves."
Romans 1 shows the truth can be heard, understood and rejected without salvation. You want to try and tell us now that the Romans 1 type didn't really hear? So grace does simply allow for hearing without salvation.
If you really think you are saying something different then try explaining your meaning for once.
So you don't answer my question, but I should?
What part of Romans 1 are you referring to?
Right. It's manifest in them. Nothing about hearing there. The truth about God is evident both through creation and conscience, but nothing there about knowing God by hearing.Romans 1:19
because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.
Is that what God did with Israel when he rescued them from Pharaoh: He simply made their escape possible? Or what about Eve, when God saved her: He simply gave her the opportunity to save herself -- to cooperate with his offer of salvation? Or what about Jesus when he healed the blind man at birth -- and he wasn't even a believer when Jesus first encountered him. That's your version of God -- a mere Potential Savior -- certainly not the bible's version.
Romans 1:19
because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.
Right. It's manifest in them. Nothing about hearing there. The truth about God is evident both through creation and conscience, but nothing there about knowing God by hearing.
Yeah like the gospel he already sent forth gives life to those who accept it and believe.So the word of God spoken by Jesus gave life to Lazarus?
So the word of God spoken by Jesus gave life to Lazarus?
The term is equivalent to epignosis.
They KNOW God is real.
It doesn't really matter how they answer. If dead people can't hear, but suddenly do, the hearing couldn't have come from themselves. Neither can it simply mean audible hearing, as dead people can't audibly hear.
If they say life must first be imparted, then they have life granted before hearing can lead to faith.
This is why no one has answered.