Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Don't think that had anything to do with it! He was hated before he was born. :p
I rechecked before speaking but there's no such Verse that makes the claim you have made.

Is this personal belief because it's definitely not Biblically true?
 
God is not a respector of people.

If He died for one person who will believe He died for the one who reject Him.

He died for all so that all unbelievers and believers could stand before Him and be judged.

What many fail to realize... is that no one would exist right today if the sin issue was not dealt with by God.
All mankind would have been forsaken!
Instead of mankind, Jesus was forsaken.

Matthew 27:46​
And about the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying,
“Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?” that is, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?”

The Cross made it possible for the entire fallen human race not to be wiped out by God and forsaken.

So? When an unbeliever stands before the Lord?
Not one sin will be mentioned to evaluate that unbeliever.

Ask why.
 
So...you seem to be saying that God is indebted to the sinner? He owes them a "way out" of THEIR sin? On what judicial basis does He owe them? Or what have sinners given to God that he needs to repay them (Rom 11:35)!? Is God the cause of their sin? Or....

Job 41:11
11 Who has a claim against me that I must pay?
Everything under heaven belongs to me.

NIV

Or....

Matt 20:15
15 Don't I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?'

NIV


"So you seem to say God is indebted to the sinner" if thats how you interpret anything I've said on here.. its no wonder others dont trust your interpretations of the Bible.
 
"So you seem to say God is indebted to the sinner" if thats how you interpret anything I've said on here.. its no wonder others dont trust your interpretations of the Bible.

He is jammed in a God's Sovereignty mode.
Might as well be arguing with a Calvinist.
 
How does some one turn the words " God GAVE man a way out" into "God now owes man something?"

Its blowing my mind. I mean they are completely the opposite things. Not even easily confused with one another.
 
What fixes the depravity issue is changing the heart. Actually it is replaced. That does NOT happen at birth.


Then that is not the free will of the natural man you are espousing, since only those made alive in Christ have the
freedom to choose. That is quite different. But we are slaves either way, first to sin, and then to righteousness.
Men in the OT were called righteous even as sinners. They were not being called to believe the gospel.
They had direct experience with God which some here call God being unfair.

What fixes the depravity issue is changing the heart. Actually it is replaced. That does NOT happen at birth.

I didn't say it did. I said the opposite. To be depraved is morally corrupt. Not to be absent of will. To be totally depraved theologically is to be so morally corrupt to reject God. To reject God is still a choice. Except God's Spirit draws people towards a new heart in Christ. You can be morally corrupt and still be persuaded by the Spirit to come to believe in Christ. That is the gospel. Come to, believe, repent, and accept what Christ has done and then the indwelling, not befo

re.

No NT account has the change of heart coming before the indwelling. It comes after, meaning they at first had to believe and accept Christ.

Forced conversion or unrelenting grace is unbiblical.

Then that is not the free will of the natural man you are espousing, since only those made alive in Christ have the
freedom to choose.

Maybe according to anti-free will doctrines but I do not see as stated above a sinner not having the ability to choose Christ.

That is quite different. But we are slaves either way, first to sin, and then to righteousness.

True but not slaves of will or mind.

Men in the OT were called righteous even as sinners. They were not being called to believe the gospel.
They had direct experience with God which some here call God being unfair.

My point is not the difference in OT and NT ways to salvation but to provide proof that totally depravity is false in the sense that righteousness (will to do God's will) was still found before the indwelling.

(Sure there are OT accounts that speak of the Spirit coming upon someone to empower them and then leave. But not in many cases)

Genesis 6:8-9 declares, "Noah, however, found favor in the eyes of the LORD. This is the account of Noah. Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation; Noah walked with God."

God found favor/grace towards Noah due to His life being set apart from the depravity of the world.


Found favor due to being righteous not given favor due to being made righteous which is proof that Noah had a choice. To follow the God of his fathers or the ways of the world corrupted by the fallen angels.

(Of course, it was still Noah's faith in God that saved Him both physically and spiritually.)
 
I didn't say it did. I said the opposite. To be depraved is morally corrupt. Not to be absent of will. To be totally depraved theologically is to be so morally corrupt to reject God. To reject God is still a choice. Except God's Spirit draws people towards a new heart in Christ. You can be morally corrupt and still be persuaded by the Spirit to come to believe in Christ. That is the gospel. Come to, believe, repent, and accept what Christ has done and then the indwelling, not befo

re.

No NT account has the change of heart coming before the indwelling. It comes after, meaning they at first had to believe and accept Christ.

Forced conversion or unrelenting grace is unbiblical.



Maybe according to anti-free will doctrines but I do not see as stated above a sinner not having the ability to choose Christ.



True but not slaves of will or mind.



My point is not the difference in OT and NT ways to salvation but to provide proof that totally depravity is false in the sense that righteousness (will to do God's will) was still found before the indwelling.

(Sure there are OT accounts that speak of the Spirit coming upon someone to empower them and then leave. But not in many cases)

Genesis 6:8-9 declares, "Noah, however, found favor in the eyes of the LORD. This is the account of Noah. Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation; Noah walked with God."

God found favor/grace towards Noah due to His life being set apart from the depravity of the world.

Found favor due to being righteous not given favor due to being made righteous which is proof that Noah had a choice. To follow the God of his fathers or the ways of the world corrupted by the fallen angels.

(Of course, it was still Noah's faith in God that saved Him both physically and spiritually.)
If righteousness, the will to do God's will, is found before the indwelling of the Spirit, why do we need Christ's imputed righteousness? Wouldn't that mean we are perfectly capable of righteousness on our own?
 
Men in the OT were called righteous even as sinners. They were not being called to believe the gospel.
They had direct experience with God which some here call God being unfair
My point is not the difference in OT and NT ways to salvation
Salvation throughout all the history of mankind has been through faith. Noah saved by grace through faith ... Abraham saved by grace through faith ... Moses saved by grace through faith ...

None of the OT believers were without sin ... all came to God through faith after God revealed Himself to them.

Believing is the same in both OT and NT ... the difference is OT believers looked to Messiah prior to His death, resurrection, ascension ... we look to Messiah after His death, resurrection, ascension.
.
 
But did God purpose in eternity to save all men w/o exception? God's decretive will and his desirous will are two different things.

Also, have you ever asked yourself: Why would an omniscient God who knows all things offer his gift of grace to people He knew in eternity would never accept it? Hasn't God always known the end from the very beginning?

Another question: Why would God offer the gift of grace to people He never knew in eternity?

But did God purpose in eternity to save all men w/o exception? God's decretive will and his desirous will are two different things.

I already said the exception was belief in Christ. That is the condition that must be met.

I agree, there is a difference between His desired will and what He allows. His desire is to save all but not all are saved. Why? Is He not powerful enough to do so? Couldn't He just make people be saved? Of course. But reality and scripture speak of rejection and Hell. Conclusion: It is man who chooses to reject God.

Also, have you ever asked yourself: Why would an omniscient God who knows all things offer his gift of grace to people He knew in eternity would never accept it? Hasn't God always known the end from the very beginning?

Of course. God knows but He is also not just a God of the beginning and the end. He is in the present as well. Knowing in the present who rejects Him unto their death is the only way a name is blotted from the Book of Life.

Meaning God has everyone in His Book of Life with the desire that they meet the condition. When they do not, they are blotted out.

Here is where it gets cool. 😎

Revelation 13:8 (ESV)
8 and all who dwell on earth will worship it, everyone whose name has not been written before the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who was slain.

God absolutely knows who responds to Him. The names are written before the foundation of the world. BUT....

Revelation 3:5 ESV
The one who conquers will be clothed thus in white garments, and I will never blot his name out of the book of life. I will confess his name before my Father and before his angels.

How can a name be blotted out if God had already written the saved within it? Because God is outside of time. He can see the present just as He sees the end. Only those who conquer, overcome, and gain the victory will be in the Book of Life. Those who reject Him are blotted out.

Another question: Why would God offer the gift of grace to people He never knew in eternity?

To give everyone the chance of salvation. Christ died for all, correct? He may not know them in eternity but He sure desired and tried to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hakawaka
If righteousness, the will to do God's will, is found before the indwelling of the Spirit, why do we need Christ's imputed righteousness? Wouldn't that mean we are perfectly capable of righteousness on our own?
Scripture tells us righteousness is imputed by God to those who believe:

Romans 4:3-5 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

and please note, Romans 4 tells us faith is not works.
.
 
If righteousness, the will to do God's will, is found before the indwelling of the Spirit, why do we need Christ's imputed righteousness? Wouldn't that mean we are perfectly capable of righteousness on our own?

Nope. An unbeliever can still do a righteous act in not murdering out of anger but that hardly save them from their debt of sin. Only Christ can do that. Good question though.
 
What fixes the depravity issue is changing the heart. Actually it is replaced. That does NOT happen at birth.

Our heart is changed by what we come to think with God's Word.
Thinking with Bible doctrine that you did not think with prior to salvation.

The Heart is where we think with in regard to our values and new priorities in Christ.


“As a man thinks in his heart, so is he.”

Proverbs 23:7​

God gives us a new heart by providing Christians with Bible doctrine to think with and to live by.
A new heart to replace our old heart with its way of thinking that we developed while living for the world.

grace and peace ............
 
Nope. An unbeliever can still do a righteous act in not murdering out of anger but that hardly save them from their debt of sin. Only Christ can do that. Good question though.
Yes, evil men still do tighteous deeds.

Matthew 7:11 KJV — If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?
 
2 Corinthians 5:17 KJV — Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.

If any man be IN Christ, what happen? It says he us a ne creature, hence given a new heart' desire for God. The condition is you need to be IN Christ by faith first.
 
It would make a lot of the bible nonsensical if this for instance was a false reality God is giving them

“I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:”
‭‭Deuteronomy‬ ‭30:19‬ ‭

why would he just tell them they weren’t capable of understanding him ? Instead he explained that his word wasn’t beyond tbier ability to hear and indersrsnd that it was given to them and put in thier heart so that they could obey it .

“For this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not hidden from thee, neither is it far off. It is not in heaven, that thou shouldest say, Who shall go up for us to heaven, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it? Neither is it beyond the sea, that thou shouldest say, Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it?

But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it.

See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil;”
‭‭Deuteronomy‬ ‭30:11-15‬ ‭KJV‬‬
Yeah if what calvinists teach is correct, this verse is just absolutely untruthful and God is lying to the israelites.

Conclusion: Calvinism is false.
 
I keep hearing bad trees cannot bring forth good fruit. Completely agree. But the fruits of repentance start the second after you repent not before. So how do you know you need to repent if your heart is still wicked?
There is a thing that happens .. its called being BORN AGAIN. Then we are no longer a bad tree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roughsoul1991
I keep wondering where "metanoia" is defined a producing good fruit in scripture?
Fruits worthy of metanoia is in the Bible:

Matthew 3:8
Produce fruit in keeping with repentance.


Acts 26:20
First to those in Damascus and Jerusalem, then to everyone in the region of Judea, and then to the Gentiles, I declared that they should repent and turn to God, performing deeds worthy of their repentance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere and cv5
But did God purpose in eternity to save all men w/o exception? God's decretive will and his desirous will are two different things.

Also, have you ever asked yourself: Why would an omniscient God who knows all things offer his gift of grace to people He knew in eternity would never accept it? Hasn't God always known the end from the very beginning?

Another question: Why would God offer the gift of grace to people He never knew in eternity?
Yes He did. The idea of two wills is something imagined, just philosophy which the Bible tells us to avoid.

Omniscient God would offer His gift of grace to people He knows won't accept it because He loves them and the people are at fault not Him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roughsoul1991
Indeed.
No free-willer is arguing that God is NOT the First mover, the Initiator, the Caller, the Inviter to the wedding, the Bridegroom who is doing the wooing.

Of course He is. He is always first. He is also last.

But we created beings are "called"..........to respond. We either "receive" or do not "receive".
Extensive convoluted commentary is not required for something a child can so easily understand.
Amen. Once you have a preconceived interpretive grid like TULIP, you must force all of Scripture to adhere to it and you gotta make all these non-biblical categories.

Effectual call, general call, decretive will, permissive will, revealed will and a whole lot of other words they use.

They are fighting against windmills though, the only converts calvinists seem to get is people who are ALREADY Christian, very rarely do they convert unbelievers, for obvious reasons. They are infamous for fishing in a barrel.
No one else inside of Christianity believes every single thing is predestined. No one. Its just them. Outside of Christianity I can only think of islam that also teaches its all predestined