Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Well I would say because for some indeterminate amout of time between God creating Eve from Adam till they ate the apple, it would be safe to assume they both were in the presence of God and He spoke to them. Unless He just ignored Eve or put her outside evertime He spoke to Adam.

Well you can theorize all you want, but the bible says that God spoke directly only to Adam prior to the Fall. And this makes sense, and explains why the evil one singled out Eve because he knew she didn't have any empirical evidence of God's existence. He figured Eve would be easier pickings. And he was right! Everything she knew about God prior to the Fall came from Adam.
 
Well you can theorize all you want, but the bible says that God spoke directly only to Adam prior to the Fall. And this makes sense, and explains why the evil one singled out Eve because he knew she didn't have any empirical evidence of God's existence. He figured Eve would be easier pickings. And he was right! Everything she knew about God prior to the Fall came from Adam.

It says he spoke directly to Adam not that he spoke only to Adam.
 
Important point. It's important to understand what God is looking for vs. from His perfect perspective what He sees.

Nor is it the free will argument of anyone I've read in these threads. It is however what is alleged against others in these threads. It's actually more akin to the legalist.

Very true. Of course the laws will always be holy but the standard to stand in front of God is perfection. As to why the High Priest had to do so many rituals just to be perfectly cleaned (atoned) for a short period.

I respect your effort to resist assumptions and understand the other person.

It is easy to just spout the typical anti-Calvinism or anti-Arminianism scriptures or talking points without understanding that not all hold strictly to the definitions in those models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hakawaka
Not either/or but both/and.
How so? Nobody chooses God first. No worldly person is seeking Him. They are blinded and opposed to the spiritual things of God, slaves to sin, lovers of darkness, refusing to come into the light, under the power and influence of Satan, unable to comprehend or know God. That is what Scripture actually says. Not, the person who hates God will decide to believe in Him, and believe the foolishness he hears when the gospel is preached... but that God enables us, makes us alive in Him while we were yet dead in our tresspasses, draws us with loving kindness to engender repentance. Quite a few here minimize what it is to be born after Adam, the incurable wickedness of man's heart to them is good ground for growing the Seed of God's Word into faith but that again contradicts what Jesus said. A bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit. It is with the heart that one believes and we cannot change ourselves. It is the work of God, and a promise He made to do so.
Here we see those given but yet in other passages we see that Christ died for everyone. For whoever will believe. God gave His Son for all. That is core Christian doctrine. So how do we harmonize a passage that seems to say only God gives some to Christ but yet the invitation is to all. A contradiction unless the giving is part of the Holy Spirit drawing all of mankind.
If all were given all would come. Obviously all are not given.
As to why God draws them so that none are with excuse. All have a choice as to why all are without excuse. People go to Hell not because of God, but because they chose Hell over God.
None are without excuse because they know God exists but did not give any glory to Him. But creation does not proclaim the gospel message.
I know this will challenge the perseverance of the saints and being sealed interpretation but only those who abide are those given to Christ. Meaning it is faithfulness in the finished work of Christ unto the end of life.
Scripture says it is not because of anything we have done.
 
You obviously haven't been paying attention to the numerous posts by the avid FWers here. To them, God is not an actual Savior since there is no efficacy to his grace. All God does is provide the sons of men with opportunities to save themselves, since it is their "freewill" that actually efficacious. So...of what value is there in God "moving hearts to believe" when there is zero efficacy in that power?

Or where was this "synergism" (so called) in the Garden when God sovereignly decreed to reconcile Eve unto himself, while simultaneously omitting Adam from that decree? Or where was it when God decreed in eternity to make Issac and Jacob participants in the Abrahamic Covenant, while simultaneously excluding Ishmael and Esau from the Covenant? Or where is the ring of synergism in God sovereignly choosing who He will have mercy and compassion on, since salvation does not depend on the man who wills or exerts himself (Rom 9:16). Or where was synergism when God rescued and redeemed the helpless Israelites in Egypt? Or where is the synergism in Peter's confession of faith? Or where was synergism when Jesus raised Lazarus from his tomb? (Oh wait...this last one doesn't count since mankind is not dead to God, and since man isn't spiritually dead, then man's own natural will power is sufficient unto salvation!) The only people on this thread that acknowledge and confess to God's supernatural power in salvation are the believers in the Doctrines of Grace.

Plus, I find your explanation now more than disingenuous since several weeks ago you yourself proclaimed that it is sinners themselves who make the difference when one group accepts the gospel and the other one does not. You didn't even give God an honorable mention! But now all of a sudden He "moves hearts" -- HEARTS no less!? What in the world does a man's heart have to do with his volition!? Salvation is all about MAN'S volition, volition, volition, volition in Pelagianism, Arminianism, or Freewillism -- whichever term floats your boat.

God commanding unbelievers to believe in Christ is not them saving themselves, it is obedience in surrender to Christ to do what they could never do themselves. Typical strawman arguments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hakawaka
God commanding unbelievers to believe in Christ is not them saving themselves, it is obedience in surrender to Christ to do what they could never do themselves. Typical strawman arguments.
Scripture says the mind set on the flesh is inherently hostile to God and cannot submit to His law. Something has to change first.
The person without the indwelling of the Holy Spirit of God... is his mind set on the spiritual things of God? Scripture says no.
It says that person is OPPOSED to the spiritual things of God and hates God. They refuse to come into the light.
 
Stay focused! I'm not talking about nurturing. I'm talking about human nature. Do you know the difference between the two?

Scripture tells us that man is DARKNESS itself and that man naturally loves the Darkness. Since Jesus is the one and only Light of the world... and by extension his disciples as well by virtue of the indwelling Spirit, then what does this tell us about rest of mankind? Do the sons and daughters in Adam come into this world as lights or as dark tombs of darkness?

You're talking about human ability and God who knows how to work with it perfectly.

Why don't you post and explain where Scripture tells us man is darkness. And maybe you can explain how light and darkness are played against one another and what it means for Jesus to be light, for His Word to give light, and how He and John and Paul deal with these things. And so on...
 
God commanding unbelievers to believe in Christ is not them saving themselves, it is obedience in surrender to Christ to do what they could never do themselves. Typical strawman arguments.

It is if the efficacious, primary cause for their faith is their volition. If it's their "freewill" that ultimately triggered God's response, then that "freewill" would be the primary cause for them choosing to be in Christ. Yet, Paul tell us that the saints are in Christ entirely by God's doing, not ours (1Cor 1:30)! Therefore, God's grace must have been efficacious and made the difference between one choosing to repent and believe or choosing to reject the gospel.
 
Why don't you post and explain where Scripture tells us man is darkness.
Ephesians 5:8 For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord.

Darkness does not comprehend the light. Not that you asked. Just a simple statement of fact.

It also refuses to come into the light. Another Scriptural truth denied by the free will crowd.
 
You're talking about human ability and God who knows how to work with it perfectly.

Why don't you post and explain where Scripture tells us man is darkness. And maybe you can explain how light and darkness are played against one another and what it means for Jesus to be light, for His Word to give light, and how He and John and Paul deal with these things. And so on...

I cited the passage in my 4468: Eph 5:8!

Maybe you can spin that text to make it say that "you were formerly twilight"? :rolleyes: Or maybe they were simply children of the night, taking after their former father the Prince of Darkness whose seed they used be? How's that for a "novel" idea?
 
How so? Nobody chooses God first. No worldly person is seeking Him. They are blinded and opposed to the spiritual things of God, slaves to sin, lovers of darkness, refusing to come into the light, under the power and influence of Satan, unable to comprehend or know God. That is what Scripture actually says. Not, the person who hates God will decide to believe in Him, and believe the foolishness he hears when the gospel is preached... but that God enables us, makes us alive in Him while we were yet dead in our tresspasses, draws us with loving kindness to engender repentance. Quite a few here minimize what it is to be born after Adam, the incurable wickedness of man's heart to them is good ground for growing the Seed of God's Word into faith but that again contradicts what Jesus said. A bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit. It is with the heart that one believes and we cannot change ourselves. It is the work of God, and a promise He made to do so.
If all were given all would come. Obviously all are not given.


None are without excuse because they know God exists but did not give any glory to Him. But creation does not proclaim the gospel message.

Scripture says it is not because of anything we have done.

I agree, no one chooses God first.

I've explained that the blinding was judgement after rejection.

draws us with loving kindness to engender repentance

🙏🏻 This is my point. God moved first working within mankind to save as many as those who would believe.

If all were given all would come. Obviously all are not given.

To examine this in harmony. If Christ died for all. God wants all to be saved. God draws all. And salvation is for all who would believe. Then why did God choose a few while the many He chose for Hell?



Scripture says it is not because of anything we have done

Belief is not a work of legalism. It is commanded by Jesus. We are commanded to believe and accept what Christ has already done.
 
"Spoke directly to both" before or after the fall?

.


And they heard the sound of the Lord God walking in the garden in the cool [afternoon breeze] of the day,
so the man and his wife hid and kept themselves hidden from the presence of the Lord God among the trees
of the garden."
Genesis 3:8

They did not see Him.
They knew the sounds of His footsteps.

It is believed the Lord used to teach Adam in the cool part of the day.
She was with Adam when the Lord arrived.

Knowing the sound of his footsteps indicates they had been in presence before!
 
Belief is not a work of legalism. It is commanded by Jesus. We are commanded to believe and accept what Christ has already done.
I know it is not legalism but Scripture says the unregenerate man (of the flesh) is UNABLE to submit. Therefore, something has to change first.

John6-44-1-Corinthians2-14-Romans8-7-8.png

"No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him." John 6 verse 44 The natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God. For they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1 Corinthians 2 verse 14 For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot. Those who are in the flesh cannot please God. Romans 8 verse 7-8
 
That's because Eve very likely didn't exist at that point in time.

I will give you most of that point lol
But there was a time they both existed in the garden before the apple was nibbled on. It was a small portion of the time.

And the rib which the Lord God had taken from the man made he a woman and brought her unto the man. Gen 2-22

Like a father walking a bride down the isle. And considering 2 verses later it talks about man and wife. That is the analogy I get from that verse. So I say she knew and heard God
 
I
It is if the efficacious, primary cause for their faith is their volition. If it's their "freewill" that ultimately triggered God's response, then that "freewill" would be the primary cause for them choosing to be in Christ. Yet, Paul tell us that the saints are in Christ entirely by God's doing, not ours (1Cor 1:30)! Therefore, God's grace must have been efficacious and made the difference between one choosing to repent and believe or choosing to reject the gospel.

It is exactly free will that condemns mankind for rejecting Christ. Otherwise it would be the will of God for those to reject Christ. And that is not God's will. But yes, God works in all so that none are with excuse. It is entirely on us for just judgment to choose Christ or reject Him.
 
I know it is not legalism but Scripture says the unregenerate man (of the flesh) is UNABLE to submit. Something has to change first.

John6-44-1-Corinthians2-14-Romans8-7-8.png

"No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him." John 6 verse 44 The natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God. For they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1 Corinthians 2 verse 14 For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot. Those who are in the flesh cannot please God. Romans 8 verse 7-8

I agree. I just simply see that God does everything He can to save the sinner and provides many opportunities to change and move them towards belief. He moves first or else we would stay very content in our natural state.