Yes, the number of the dead would change, of course. Less is less. The point is it wouldn't change the Holocaust. It wouldn't change the severity of what happened. It would not change anything except the number of bodies.
Yes, it would because it's specifically the number that's constantly emphasized. "6 million," in fact, you emphasized it several times in this and other threads. "6 million." So let's not pretend the number doesn't matter anymore.
I encourage you to watch the video and notice that they had claimed a "holocaust" and "a suffering of 6 million" multiple times across those years. I can only speculate that they repeated it so many times because it was a very effective fundraising strategy but with the number of times they claimed "6 million" were starving to death or dying over the years, there wouldn't have been any Jewish people to even suffer through Nazi Germany. It's math.
[By the way, the video also proves that "Palestine" was acknowledged as a real place in the 1900s before the current marketing push claiming there never was such a place.]
Yes, the Muslims are to blame for starting that, though you'll never hear that but of truth.
Some of you love to blame muslims for a lot of things. No, the Papacy is to blame for the transatlantic slave trade. Prompted by the Papal Bull: Dum Diversas, which says that anyone who is a "heretic" of the roman catholic faith forfeits their lives, children, and property. This authorized heads of state to begin their colonial push into lands that were not theirs, as they believed it was their moral duty to conquer and convert "in the name of Christ". This Papal Bull ("sugar") also prompted the inquisitions against the Jews and other non-catholics.
Are you saying 15-20 million dead or enslaved people? Either way, you said other people in society are told to move on, forget about it. This is certainly not the case with slavery, especially in America.
Both. It was the systematic dehumanization and death of a single people group perpetrated by multiple nations, not just one nation, and spanned hundreds of years, not just 8-12 years. They have been pushing to change the history books so that newer generations never learn about it. It's the same strategy they're attempting with the removal of "Palestine" from the history books.
https://www.aclu.org/podcast/the-movement-to-erase-black-history-culture-and-joy
It wasn't done so the VICTIMS could learn a lesson, it was done so the perpetrators would learn a lesson.
I'm just going to let this quote echo for a bit.
It was done to stop the Nazi sentiment, the antisemitism. They are not committing genocide now. If you're going to commit genocide, you don't tell your victims you're coming and where you will be, then give them time to leave. smh
So then it was specifically for the Jews' benefit? ...and what about the Haavara Agreement of 1933 between Zionists and Nazis, which occurred 8 years before "the final solution"?
The definition of antisemitism has never changed. And you can't put anything on Youtube. Someone is going to complain and get content taken down. I'm on there often and they are always changing words to make sure they don't get taken off the site.
The video was removed, claiming it was hate speech. Apparently, facts are hate speech.
The United States of AIPAC recently attempted to redefine antisemitism as criticism of the state of Israel.
https://adc.org/dangerous-bill/
All about the Benjamins huh?
To them? Yes, it would seem. But I'm all about the prophecies. The way prophecies work is that people have to experience what was prophesied to happen to them; otherwise, the prophecies are wrong or the people are wrong. We don't conform scripture to fit what we see happening. We measure/weigh what is happening against the words of scripture because the Word is the immutable truth. Come, let's reason together using your favorite passage on this topic,
Romans 11:
- During their blindness/hardening, they're also supposed to be "diminished" WHILE the Gentiles are elevated and gain riches UNTIL the time of the Gentiles be fulfilled, correct? Are we still in the time of the Gentiles per your eschatological reckoning?
- They're also supposed to be spurred by jealousy or envy because of the Gentiles receiving salvation, correct? Have you heard of any sentiments where these modern folks are jealous of Christian Goyim for any reason?
- Their backs are supposed to be bent always (suggesting servitude or subservience) during the time of the Gentiles. Are these modern folks bent over in subservience to any nations, or are nations subservient to them?