SECTION 1: "The Trinity Is Already Confusing…"
> “To call Christ the Everlasting Father may not confuse the Trinity any more than it is already confusing for some...”
STOP. RIGHT. THERE.
This is how Satan slithers in — not with open denial, but with suggestion. “Did God really say?” (Gen. 3:1)
No, the Trinity is not confusing. It's mystery, not contradiction. Confusion comes when you try to shrink eternal truth into a seminary outline. Isaiah 9:6 isn’t confused — it’s revelation. It’s prophecy with thunder in its bones.
This verse doesn’t blur the lines between Father, Son, and Spirit — it glorifies the eternal divinity of Christ.
---
SECTION 2: The Heretical Math Lesson (1 x 1 x 1 = 1)
> “The NT teaches that God relates to believers in three ways simultaneously: as the Father, as the Son, and as the Holy Spirit (1 x 1 x 1 = 1).”
This is shallow, tired, Sunday school logic that does more harm than good. God is not a mathematical equation. He is holy, uncreated, infinite, and revealed in three eternal Persons, not modes or functions.
That kind of teaching flirts with modalism — the ancient heresy that says God just appears in different forms. But the Word is clear:
Jesus prays to the Father (John 17)
The Spirit descends while the Father speaks and the Son is baptized (Luke 3:21–22)
The Father sends the Son, and the Son sends the Spirit (John 14–16)
That’s not one Person with multiple hats. That’s Trinitarian glory.
---
SECTION 3: The “Role” Reduction
> “These divine aspects or ‘persons’ may be distinguished by role: God the Father as creator… the Son as mediator… the Spirit as indweller…”
No. That’s functional reductionism. You’re reducing the Persons of the Godhead to job descriptions. God is not a cosmic employee clocking into different shifts.
The Father, Son, and Spirit are co-eternal, co-equal, and fully God — always operating in unity, but not interchangeable roles. Jesus isn’t just the “mediator,” He is YHWH in the flesh. The Spirit isn’t just “the indweller,” He is God who hovered over the waters of creation and raised Christ from the dead.
This breakdown is weak theology dressed up in grammatical categories. It sounds safe, but it strips power.
---
SECTION 4: The Gender Confusion Insert
> “Only God the Son is human and had a sexual orientation while on earth…”
What? Where is this coming from? Christ’s humanity never included sexual activity or orientation. That’s a carnal line of thinking — foreign to Scripture and unnecessary in this discussion.
God is referred to as Father not because He has human anatomy, but because He exercises loving, sovereign, covenantal authority. This “don’t forget females are also in the image of God” detour is a distraction from the central truth of Christ’s identity in Isaiah 9:6.
---
SECTION 5: The QUADITY Blasphemy
> “In a sense God may be viewed as a ‘Quadity’…”
BLASPHEMY.
This is where the response goes off the rails and into the abyss.
“Quadity”? That’s not biblical. That’s panentheistic garbage. That’s trying to blend Christianity with New Age cosmic mush.
God is not “part of creation.” He created all things.
God is not a force. He is Father, Son, and Spirit — not wind, tree, and molecule.
Romans 1:25 warns of those who “worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.”
That’s exactly what happens when someone elevates creation as a “mode” of God’s revelation.
This is not orthodoxy. This is poison in a theological cup.
---
Final Verdict
This entire response is a Trojan horse.
It sounds intellectual. It quotes Scripture. It uses flowery words.
But at its core — it is confusion wrapped in commentary.
It takes the blazing glory of Isaiah 9:6 and cools it into a cold puddle of religious relativism.
It doesn’t exalt Christ.
It doesn’t preach the incarnation.
It doesn’t tremble before the throne.
Instead, it whispers half-truths that neuter the gospel and exalt human understanding.
