1. This is how Satan slithers in — not with open denial, but with suggestion. “Did God really say?” (Gen. 3:1)
No, Satan slithers in by disallowing questions.
2. the Trinity is not confusing. It's mystery, not contradiction.
The early church found the Trinity quite confusing and debated it for centuries, but let's hear your explanation of it.
3. The Heretical Math Lesson (1 x 1 x 1 = 1)
So let's see how you would express the Trinity mathematically.
4. God is not a mathematical equation. He is holy, uncreated, infinite, and revealed in three eternal Persons, not modes or functions.
That shallow, tired, Sunday school logic explains exactly zero.
5. That kind of teaching flirts with modalism — the ancient heresy that says God just appears in different forms. But the Word is clear:
Jesus prays to the Father (John 17) The Spirit descends while the Father speaks and the Son is baptized (Luke 3:21–22)
The Father sends the Son, and the Son sends the Spirit (John 14–16) That’s not one Person with multiple hats. That’s Trinitarian glory.
No, that's modalism aka manifestations or one God relating to humanity in three ways.
6. That (“These divine aspects or ‘persons’ may be distinguished by role: God the Father as creator… the Son as mediator… the Spirit as indweller…”) is functional reductionism. You’re reducing the Persons of the Godhead to job descriptions.
That is how God describes Himself, so you need to ask Him about that.
7. Where is this ("Only God the Son is human and had a sexual orientation while on earth…”) coming from? Christ’s humanity never included sexual activity or orientation. That’s a carnal line of thinking — foreign to Scripture and unnecessary in this discussion.
CC never ceases to amaze me and broaden my horizons. I have never encountered anyone who denied that Jesus was a man before.
8. This (“In a sense God may be viewed as a ‘Quadity’…”) is where the response goes off the rails and into the abyss. That’s not biblical. That’s panentheistic garbage.
No, that's incorporating Rom. 1:20,
John 1:1-3,
Psa. 33:6 and
Acts 17:28 into the discussion.
If you would not delete/omit the Scripture references when quoting me it would be helpful,
and I specifically warned against panentheism.
9. This entire response.. quotes Scripture.
You finally noticed!
10. it is confusion wrapped in commentary.
I find it quite helpful, and I am sorry you find it confusing.
11. It whispers half-truths that neuter the gospel.
On the contrary, God revealed himself to Elijah via a whisper in 1KG 19:12,
so you would do well to meditate on the Scripture I cited.
LIC, GWH