Salvation is a Free Gift from God but the road to Salvation is not Free! Even Jesus Himself said that few will make it through the narrow gate and Jesus was / is God in the Living flesh and blood!
Which would include that he is the Son of God? This is all that I can gather from a reading of John 3:14-18 (KJV) when reading it honestly and not trying to bend words into it. What I am struck by is 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 and to a smaller extent Romans 3:21-26 and Romans 10:9, which seem to put a different emphasis on salvation. In 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 the gospel seems to be the object of belief, that one is saved by believing the gospel, which I suppose might not be what Paul is trying to communicate. In Romans 3:25 it seems to be saying that salvation comes by faith in Jesus' blood when read a certain way, though, this verse and surrounding verses can be read another way to be completely in line with how I read John 3. In Romans 10:9 in the KJV it says that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. This makes sense too considering John 3 since if you believe in your heart that God raised Jesus from the dead you would believe in Jesus, along with confessing him with your mouth (I cannot read these words the way they are put forth in the NIV and ESV, "that if you confess with your mouth "Jesus is Lord" and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved", they don't read like that to me, though I am not saying that that is not what they mean, and I understand they are translating from the Greek), though I don't understand why the "goal post" is moved here from belief in Jesus to something else, though the preceding verses seem to necessitate the language.
The solace in this is that all these issues can be reconciled in that none of these verses can contradict the point of view that belief in Jesus alone is what constitutes salvation, i.e. there is no problem. It is just disconcerting reading these things when I am not entirely sure what constitutes salvation myself, though I lean towards the view that it is belief in Jesus alone, because I don't see how John 3 can be read any other way. I could use some major help in understanding the truth in this. What does constitute salvation? When answering this question please address the things I've written. And please no posts from gotquestions or copy and pastes from other websites unless you have read those materials and agree with what they're saying, but if you do why not put it into your own words? I don't like the regurgitation of materials on the internet and the standard it sets for people to not understand things themselves.
On the topic of gotquestions, they seem to be in line with the belief that it is faith in Jesus' blood that constitutes salvation, though, like I wrote, when I read John 3, I don't see how that is the case.
When responding to me please be patient, I am sincerely trying to understand.
What you are experiencing is the truth that God's one requirement for salvation
can be expressed in various ways that are summarized by the word "faith",
so you will need to employ the semantic/hermeneutic gift of "both-and" logic,
which means being able to harmonize Scripture or see synonyms and essential similarities,
like describing different facets of one diamond or understanding anatomy by adding one system at a time.
For a systematic and rather complete consideration of the doctrine of salvation/soteriology,
please see Lesson 2 (The Christian Creed) of our website: <truthseekersfellowship.com>
LIC, GWH
One has physically act upon what Jesus had said until they are able to get the Father to reveal Himself!
James 2:17 > "Faith without action is useless"
The only thing that involves sacrifice on one's behalf that Jesus mentioned was to give to the poor and needy. Jesus sacrificed his life both physically and symbolically for all the sins of humanity therefor all people need to sacrifice for one another in order to make it to the Father! This is also validated in Romans (written by Paul the Apostle) where one will be judged based on their pursuit of Righteousness and Good Works instead of their sins. Why? Jesus already paid for the sins of humanity therefor people will be judged by how treat one another by their pursuits of Righteousness and Good Works!
No one ever claimed that they made it to the Father just by claiming that they were "Saved!" Everything has to match the Bible 100% and to match Scripture exactly one is required to go through Jesus to get to the Father, correct? Salvation is the Free but the path that leads to that Salvation not Free!
Jesus would have said this exactly but instead Jesus said that few will make it through the narrow gate (Mathew 7:13 ~14) and Jesus was / is God in the living flesh and blood according to the Book of John. This would mean that one would be required to physically do something to get to the Father in order to become "Saved." The only thing that Jesus really asked of His followers that involved physical sacrifice was to give to the poor and needy!
In Hebrews 10:26, to sin willfully carries the idea of deliberate intention that is habitual, which stems from rejecting Christ deliberately. This is continuous action, a matter of practice. Now we don't walk along our daily life and "accidentally" fall into a pit called sin. We exercise our will but, the use of the participle clearly shows willful, habitual, continuous action. The unrighteous practice sin (1 Corinthians 6:9-10; Galatians 5:19-21); not the righteous, who are born of God. (1 Corinthians 6:11; 1 John 3:9)Why exactly do you think OSAS is not true? I see the argument for it, namely what it says in Hebrews 10:26 and I think another place in Hebrews, but there seems to be staunch argument against the view (that I never really quite understood).
AmenHe says our faith is justified by our works. There is nothing in James to suggest works save us. If we have genuine faith in God and not just "hearsay" (because I say so Jm.2:18), then we will have works commensurate with our faith. If our works don't line up with what we say we believe then our faith is dead (ie.no production of value).
Faith comes from the word (Rom.10:17) and the word of God is alive and active (Heb.4:12) hence genuine faith results in works.
Show us where Jesus said that whoever is not baptized will be condemned. Mark 16:16(b) - but he who does not believe will be condemned. The omission of baptized with "does not believe" shows that Jesus does not make baptism absolutely necessary for salvation. Condemnation rests on unbelief and not on a lack of baptism. John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.It really makes no difference to the message of the Bible whether Mark 16:16 needs to be included or not because the truth of Mark 16:16 is the same throughout the New Testament. Jesus commanded baptism in His last words to His disciples in Matt 28 :18-19 just before His ascension into heaven. Mark describes a similar scene in His account also just before Jesus’s ascension. Jesus taught Belief and baptism and the conversions in the rest of the New Testament act out that teaching. Read these scriptures.
What did these Jews already believe? In Acts 2:37, their "belief" at this point was mere "mental assent" that Jesus was the Messiah, and they were guilty of crucifying Him. *That is not saving belief yet. They still needed to repent (change their mind) and by faith trust in Jesus Christ for salvation. Two sides to the same coin.Acts 2:38- those Jews already believed when they asked Peter “What must we do?” Peter didn’t tell them to BELIEVE because they already did but he did tell them to repent AND BE BAPTIZED for the remission if sins. So what did those Jews in Acts 2 do? They BELIEVED and were BAPTIZED.
Simon the sorcerer is said to have “believed and was baptized” at the preaching of Philip (Acts 8:13) but later, when Simon offers the apostles money to have their ability to impart the Holy Spirit (verses 18–19), he is rebuked by Peter. Peter answered: "May your money perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money! You have no part or share in this ministry, because your heart is not right before God. 22 Repent therefore of this your wickedness and pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you. 23 For I see that you are poisoned by bitterness and bound by iniquity. (verses 20-24) You called that saved? Even though we read that Simon "believed," the remainder of the verse hints at the true object of his belief: "the miracles and signs which were done." No saving belief in Christ.Acts 8- the Samaritans, verse 12 - BELIEVED the things Phillip preached and both men and women were BAPTIZED.
Acts 8:13- Simon the Sorcerer, BELIEVED and was BAPTIZED.
The eunuch believed and was saved then afterwards, baptized. In keeping with harmony with scripture, in John 20:31, we read - but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name.Acts 8:36-38- the eunuch said, “ I BELIEVE that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.” And Phillip BAPTIZED him.
The language in Acts 22:16 is similar to the statement of Christ when He took the bread and said, "This is my body." (Matthew 26:26) The bread was only the emblem of His body. Baptism is the emblem of the washing away of sins by the blood of Christ. Every time a believer is immersed, he washes away his sins in the same sense Paul did: not literally, but ceremonially, pointing to the blood of Christ by which sins are actually washed away. (Ephesians 1:7; Colossians 1:14; 1 John 1:7; Revelation 1:5)Acts 9- Saul of Tarsus- BELIEVED AND IN Acts 22:19 washed away his sins in BAPTISM.
Same pattern. BELIEVED, saved then baptized.Acts 16: Lydia, BELIEVED (verse 14) and was BAPTIZED ( verse 15).
Paul's answer to the question, "what must I do to be saved" was "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you and your household (if they also believe). Not believe and get baptized and you will be saved.Acts 16:32- the jailer and his house BELIEVED in verse 32 and were BAPTIZED in verse 33.
BELIEVED, saved then baptized.Acts 18:8- “And many of the Corinthians hearing, BELIEVED AND WERE BAPTIZED.”
In 1 Peter 3:21, Peter tells us that baptism now saves you, yet when Peter uses this phrase, he continues in the same sentence to explain exactly what he means by it. He said that baptism now saves you-not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not what saves you), "but an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is symbolized by the outward ceremony of water baptism).So, you see, even if Mark 16:16 were not in the Bible at all, would make no difference to what is TRUTH or to what the Bible teaches or to proving that you must believe and be baptized to be saved. The SAME THING is taught in at least 8 other scriptures. And I haven’t even mentioned Hebrews 11:6 that says without faith it is impossible to please God or 1 Peter 3:21 that proves that baptism saves us. Faith and baptism are taught all over the New Testament—it’s just that like Psalms 119:160 says, you must take the SUM of what God says and put it all together to get the “TRUTH.” God’s truth does not depend on one passage of scripture.
I have no problem with Mark 16:16 and the second clause clarifies the first. Also, if water baptism is absolutely required for salvation, then we would expect Jesus to mention it in the following verses. (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26) Yet what is the ONE requirement that Jesus mentions NINE different times in each of these complete statements *BELIEVES. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics.I happen to believe that God is fully capable of preserving and PROTECTING His word, the Bible. I have faith in God enough to believe that if Mark 16:16 did not need to be included in His word, He would and COULD make sure it was not there. Thus, I believe it is perfectly valid and is there by His divine will.
That salvation is by grace through faith and is not by works is not hard to understand. (Ephesians 2:8,9) It's just hard for works-salvationists to ACCEPT. It's a shame that human pride will not allow works-salvationists to place their faith in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. (Romans 4:5-6) Their hands are full of their works (with a heavy emphasis on baptism) and they will not let go in order to receive Christ through faith.My faith is simple. I just believe God is able and HAS provided us a book that we can trust. He would not allow us to be led astray by HIS book. I feel that I can teach Mark 16:16 with full confidence that it is indeed the truth.
In 1 Peter 3:21, Peter tells us that baptism now saves you, yet when Peter uses this phrase, he continues in the same sentence to explain exactly what he means by it. He said that baptism now saves you-not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not what saves you), "but an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is symbolized by the outward ceremony of water baptism).
Just as the eight people in the ark were "saved THROUGH water" as they were IN THE ARK. They were not literally saved "by" the water. Hebrews 11:7 is clear on this point (..built an ARK for the SAVING of his household). *The context reveals that ONLY the righteous (Noah and his family) were DRY and therefore SAFE. In contrast, only the wicked in Noah's day came in contact with the water and they all perished. So, by Peter saying, "not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience - through the resurrection of Jesus Christ," Peter guards against saving power to the physical ceremony in H20.
We are to take the SUM of what God says and properly harmonize scripture with scripture before reaching our conclusion on doctrine and not distort and pervert passages of scripture in an effort to "patch together" a works based false gospel.
I have no problem with Mark 16:16 and the second clause clarifies the first. Also, if water baptism is absolutely required for salvation, then we would expect Jesus to mention it in the following verses. (3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26) Yet what is the ONE requirement that Jesus mentions NINE different times in each of these complete statements *BELIEVES. *What happened to baptism? *Hermeneutics.
That salvation is by grace through faith and is not by works is not hard to understand. (Ephesians 2:8,9) It's just hard for works-salvationists to ACCEPT. It's a shame that human pride will not allow works-salvationists to place their faith in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. (Romans 4:5-6) Their hands are full of their works (with a heavy emphasis on baptism) and they will not let go in order to receive Christ through faith.
Is this verse stated as a generality or the sum total?" he who believes in Him is not condemed. but whoever does not believe has already been condemned"
simple. straightforward.
Is this verse stated as a generality or the sum total?
Think before you answer.
Is this verse stated as a generality or the sum total?
Think before you answer.
You honestly believe that this verse is not written as a generality?" believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved"
yes, that is the sum total.
Percentage, trust and confidence is not in the sum total of the verse. You are simply adding to the passage that which is not expressed.not having 100% faith, belief and trust and confidence in Christ = not saved.
Agreed but not in question.salvation is His, found in Him, not in us. we don't save ourselves..
This thread duplicates "Saved by faith alone?"
So please post these thoughts there.
Thanks.
Which would include that he is the Son of God? This is all that I can gather from a reading of John 3:14-18 (KJV) when reading it honestly and not trying to bend words into it. What I am struck by is 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 and to a smaller extent Romans 3:21-26 and Romans 10:9, which seem to put a different emphasis on salvation. In 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 the gospel seems to be the object of belief, that one is saved by believing the gospel, which I suppose might not be what Paul is trying to communicate. In Romans 3:25 it seems to be saying that salvation comes by faith in Jesus' blood when read a certain way, though, this verse and surrounding verses can be read another way to be completely in line with how I read John 3. In Romans 10:9 in the KJV it says that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. This makes sense too considering John 3 since if you believe in your heart that God raised Jesus from the dead you would believe in Jesus, along with confessing him with your mouth (I cannot read these words the way they are put forth in the NIV and ESV, "that if you confess with your mouth "Jesus is Lord" and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved", they don't read like that to me, though I am not saying that that is not what they mean, and I understand they are translating from the Greek), though I don't understand why the "goal post" is moved here from belief in Jesus to something else, though the preceding verses seem to necessitate the language.
The solace in this is that all these issues can be reconciled in that none of these verses can contradict the point of view that belief in Jesus alone is what constitutes salvation, i.e. there is no problem. It is just disconcerting reading these things when I am not entirely sure what constitutes salvation myself, though I lean towards the view that it is belief in Jesus alone, because I don't see how John 3 can be read any other way. I could use some major help in understanding the truth in this. What does constitute salvation? When answering this question please address the things I've written. And please no posts from gotquestions or copy and pastes from other websites unless you have read those materials and agree with what they're saying, but if you do why not put it into your own words? I don't like the regurgitation of materials on the internet and the standard it sets for people to not understand things themselves.
On the topic of gotquestions, they seem to be in line with the belief that it is faith in Jesus' blood that constitutes salvation, though, like I wrote, when I read John 3, I don't see how that is the case.
When responding to me please be patient, I am sincerely trying to understand.
Sorry if this is long, Part 1
In order to understand we have to rightly divide HIS word.
We also MUST be humble, not adding to HIS word of taking away everything has to fit like a giant puzzle.
I appreciate you not wanting for people to share from web sites, they are no different then my personal opinion of what I want HIS word to say and I start my who sight. MEN'S OPINION IS MEN'S OPINION.
For instance, who is the ceo of got questions.org?
The CEO of GotQuestions.org is S. Michael Houdmann.
So people who quote from got questions .org are quoting Miclael Houdmann NOT GOD.
Who are we to follow JESUS or men, if they have their own web sight does that men they know more than GOD?
Now HIS word.
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John JESUS walked with us.
Acts the building of the church.
All books after that were letters to those who have been saved with the foundation of the book of Acts. ON THE MEAT so to speak and off of the milk.
First I will tell you share HIS word on what we must do to be saved, then I will put the other verse in there place.
JESUS said this,
Matthew 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
When JESUS was speaking to Nicodemus in John 3 he said this.
John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
HIS words, can't ENTER heaven with out being born of water and of spirit PEROID.
Verse 6, That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
So HE also separates natural from spiritual which eliminates those who think when he says water means our natural birth. Our natural birth gives us our sins, spirit birth gets rid of them.
So if a person just pulls out John 3:14-18 I ask if you believe what JESUS says in John 3:14-18 why not what HE says in John 3:3-5?
Lets look at John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him (((should not perish))), but have everlasting life.
Notice the word SHOULD not paristh, meaning if you believe in HIS you SHOULD not parrish that does NOT SAY believe in him and you are saved.
Now lets look at what HE told his disciples in Acts which lines up with John 3:3-5.
JESUS told HIS disciples,
Acts 1:4 And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me.
5 For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence.
Notice baptized with water and baptized with the Holy Ghost, John 3:5 said can't enter with out being born of water and of the spirit.
This happened AFTER THEY OBEYED,
Acts 2:3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.
4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
This is what Peter says happens when you get the Holy Ghost.
Acts 2:33 Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear.
JESUS says this is what happens when you get the Holy Ghost.
Mark 16:17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
JESUS said in Luke 24:47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
This was that message that JESUS promised to be preached.
Acts 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
NOTICE, it all lines up with JESUS said in Matthew 4:17, REPENT and what HE said in John 3, water and spirit.
That is your eisegesis. Galatians 3:26 - For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus (Period.) Not through faith and water baptism. Also read John 1:12 - But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name. *Received Him, given the right to become children of God, through believing in His name, not through water baptism.Galatians 3:27- “as many of you as have been baptized INTO Christ, have put on Christ.” The only way the Bible says we get “into” Christ is to be baptized INTO Him. When we are baptized INTO Christ, we put Him “on.” The Bible does not say we “believe” ourselves into Christ. We “believe” in Him as the son of God, but we are “put” into Him by baptism. Those are the words of the Holy Spirit—not mine.
Romans 8:1
We are Spirit baptized into the body of Christ and not water baptized. 1 Corinthians 12:13 - For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free—and have all been made to drink into one Spirit. This is signified, but not procured in water baptism., the Spirit says, “ there is no condemnation to those who are IN Christ Jesus.” We must be “in” Christ to be saved. The ONLY way we get “in” Jesus is to be baptized into Him. While “belief” is necessary, The Bible does not teach that we “believe” ourselves into Christ. Only baptism puts us “into” Him and allows us to “put Him on.”.
Faith only per James 2:24 is referring to an empty profession of faith/dead faith and not authentic faith. James 2:14 - says/claims (key word) to have faith but has no works. So, James is not using the word "justified" in James 2:24 to mean "accounted as righteous" but is shown to be righteous. James is discussing the evidence of faith (says-claims to have faith but has no works/I will show you my faith by my works - James 2:14-18) and not the initial act of being accounted as righteous with God. (Romans 4:2-3) Works bear out the justification that already came by faith. *Not to be confused with faith that trusts in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. (Romans 4:5-6; Ephesians 2:8,9)That makes “faith only” not enough—just like James says. (2:24)
Again, if one sets out to put on the clothes of a Christian, in water baptism, without first becoming a Christian (child of God through faith), then one becomes an imposter, and is declaring, in baptism, to be what they are not.In 1 Cor. 1, Paul is condemning religious division and says that some of them were calling themselves after men’s names. He says there are 2 things that are necessary in order for you to wear a person’s name: 1). That person must have been CRUCIFIED for you…and
2). YOU must have been BAPTIZED in his name.
Paul is telling them don’t call yourself after me, because I was not crucified for you and you were not baptized in my name. Therefore, you cannot say “I am of Paul.”; and for the same reasons you cannot call yourselves “of Apollo’s” or “of Cephas.”
This is significant because, this means that if you have not been baptized into Christ, according to Paul’s argument, you cannot call yourself “after Him.” You cannot wear His name. You have not “put Him on.” Gal. 3:27. How can you call yourself “ Christian” after Him if you are not “in” Him? If you have not put Him on in baptism or been baptized in His name? So, it is conceivable that there are some people calling themselves “Christian” after the name of Christ, who are NOT “Christian”. Because they believe baptism is not necessary and have never Put Christ on in baptism. They have never been baptized in His name.