It seems pretty simple. You believe Faith is the result of hearing/obeying/believing. I see Faith as obeying/believing truth we hear. Believing and having Faith IMO are synonymous. Then contextually, it's obvious that Genuine Faith/Belief includes obedience and apart from obedience there is no Genuine Faith/Belief.
IMO the wording you used immediately brought to mind than the way Calvinists speak of God giving Faith to His elect.
Thanks for clarifying.
I agree to a point that this type of communication can be difficult to convey some thoughts. But, yes, I think some are playing games with these things.
Rather than deal with your terminology of "outworking" and "prove" - which I'd have to have you explain to make sure I understand your meaning - I'll try a few things:
I don't think there is any Genuine Faith ("Faith" - please pay attention to the capital F and I'll try to stay consistent) without works. I think both James and Paul teach this. I think it has become a big problem for the proper understanding of Faith to subordinate James as we do and that subordination goes at least as far back as Luther.
If our faith is not in God, then we're doing dead works in faith and w/o dead works faith w/o works is dead. There's no such thing as faith w/o works just as there is no such thing as a living body w/o breath/spirit.
If our Faith is in God, then we're doing Good Works and Faith w/o works is dead.
James is teaching us what faith and Faith is and how it functions.
We had faith in other things and were doing dead works based upon that faith.
Then we came to Christ and our faith in whatever became Faith in God and our dead works in faith became Good Works in Faith.
What Paul is doing in Rom4:2 is setting up an assumption for sake of argument to make certain we know there is this transition of faith to Faith. IMO he is addressing James who wrote well before Paul. Abraham's dead works in faith did not accomplish righteousness. Abraham's Faith in God resulted in God gifting Him righteousness. God has to gift man with righteousness because man in faith can only do dead works. But transitioning (repenting) from faith to having Faith in God must immediately have Good Works because Faith w/o works is dead.
IOW, faith in things is faith, Faith in God is Faith. And neither faith nor Faith can be separate from works. We transition from faith to Faith and from dead works to Good Works. And the only way that transition takes place is by Grace and God having done the works that were necessary to be done.
This could be smoother but hopefully you'll get the gist.
On a related note, I've watched
@mailmandan and others make what I think is a mistake which I'll try to show in formula:
Faith + Obedience/Works s/b Faith/Obedience + Works.
If Faith and Obedience are two sides of the same coin (or as I've said, IMO they're virtually synonymous re: Genuine Faith - so, Genuine Faith/Obedience) then the latter formula is the correct representation.
When we start looking at merit and wages, then the actual works are necessary. But we can't do those works until we transition to Genuine Faith/Obedience, so there is no compensation due until
after we transition/repent/convert from faith to Faith and begin Good Works which God has promised to reward.
So, yes, anything that suggests we don't have to do Good Works in Faith under Grace is a word game and is in error. I don't have a problem with "outworking" of Faith as I think I understand you, nor do I have a problem with "proving" of Faith in the sense of outworking and proof being essentially the same thing done by men under Grace
What I do have a problem with is any suggestion that Good Works are optional in the life of a person with Genuine Faith/Obedience in God. I also have a problem with being told I'm trying to save myself when I know I've transitioned from faith to Faith, and I know that Good Works must be a part of Genuine Faith and being under Grace.