Making a case for women in leadership

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,667
3,274
113
#21
Yes, it is in the Bible but I also think context matters in this case especially in light of other verses where women can evangelise, prophesies, and study.
Exactly so often people look at the verses were paul speaks of women not speaking or being over men when that is all they focus on they don't read and take into consideration the entire chapter and not just that chapter but the chapters before and after where paul was addresing all kinds of issue in the church
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,667
3,274
113
#22
Joel 2:28, Acts 2:17 And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy. God intends to use males and females to spread his word. When Paul said that women should remain quiet in church, it means when God's word is being taught, they shouldn't talk or gossip. You know what? Neither should men!

In Paul's day it was dangerous to spread the gospel as the church was being prosecuted, therefore he didn't suffer the women to preach to protect them from harm. Keep in mind that all through the bible women were used by God. Deborah was a judge, Anna was a teacher, Andrew's daughters were prophetesses. Note that Paul made numerous references to woman that worked in the ministry. Paul was by no means contradicting himself. It is a matter of properly interpreting what was said.
Right even before the church women have been used in positions of authority I forgot about all of them, I had a vague memory of it but couldn't for the life of me remember the names and since God is no respecter of persons you would think he would have men and women both to do his will regardless of status
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,599
1,026
113
USA-TX
#26
Yes, it is in the Bible but I also think context matters in this case especially in light of other verses where women can evangelise, prophesies, and study.
Yes, and verses indicating that authority = stewardship for building up, and the greatest in the KOG is the one who serves.
Also, verses indicating that Paul was sensitive to not wanting to provoke rebellion but rather was content to plant seeds that would cause emancipation peacefully.
Thus, although there are biological differences that suggest different roles,
it may be good that wives also mother their husbands and
husbands love their wives as Christ does his bride, the church.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,667
3,274
113
#27
If someone is looking for a loophole, they can usually find one; and even back it up with scripture.
It's not about looking for a loophole it is about understanding the context and learning the truth, but sometimes you cannot take scripture at face value and have to understand what was going on in the church at the time.
 

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
874
369
63
#28
Everyone knows Pauls words on women pastors or rather a women speaking or teaching in the church and at face value this would seem pretty clear however the context of the verse has to do with the issues that was going on in the church at the time but what really got me thinking was this right here

Galatians 3:28 states that in Christ Jesus, there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor male nor female, for all are one. This verse emphasizes the equality and unity of believers in Christ, transcending traditional social and cultural divisions. It highlights that these categories, while still present in human society,
are not determinants of value or significance within the Christian community and so this verse got me thinking if this is to be true then why do we take Pauls words at face value he would be contradicting the himself
unless of course he was speaking in regards to what was going on in the church at the time then it would make sense not to mention what about the women who he even baosted about who ministered to people such as Junia?

This one verse just doesn't make sense to me if indeed women are subhuman in the church and Jesus himself never forbid women of such a thing he never even addressed it
Would Jesus forbid the gospel being preached by a women?


The scriptures are clear regarding the roles of men and women in the church.

1 Timothy 2:11-14
“Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. I do not allow (permit) a woman to teach or have authority over a man, but to be in silence. 13) For (because) 1. Adam was formed FIRST, then Eve; 2. and Adam was NOT DECEIVED, but the woman being deceived fell into transgression,”

The “roots” of this goes all the way back to Genesis 3 IN THE BEGINNING. GOD said to Eve, “Your desire shall be to your husband and HE SHALL RULE OVER YOU. God was giving out punishment and consequences for their sin. I am fully aware that this is not popular with men and women. But it makes no difference to what God has decreed if I or you like or dislike, approve or disapprove of what God says here. We. Cannot change it. Oh, I know mankind has tried, but God’s word will never be changed by man. As God told Saul of Tarsus, “It is hard for you to kick against the pricks”

I Timothy 11 references this passage in Genesis 3 and God is explaining to us WHY He has done it this way. The way that we let Jesus be our “LORD is that we accept what He says regardless of what I might think about it. Most religious people want Jesus as their SAVIOR, but NOT as their Lord. A lord had the right to make laws and “conditions” and determine “consequences.” We don’t want that!

The Bible plainly teaches that God has a certain “order” or “hierarchy” for many things.

1 Corinthians 11:3
The “head” of Christ is God.
The “head” of Man is Christ.
The “head” of woman is man.
This is God’s hierarchy. This is God’s “order.”
You can no more change the hierarchy of man and woman than we can change the hierarchy of God and Christ. Now, does this mean that Christ is “subhuman”? Just because He’s not ranked the same as GOD? Is He less valuable or Less worthy or less loved? No! This is just God’s order of things. And God has the right to make it anyway that He sees fit.

God also has a “hierarchy” or certain “order” in the church.

1 Corinthians 12:21
18) God has set the members, each one of them, in the body JUST AS HE PLEASED.” He made some of them prophets. Apostles, and teachers. Colossians 1:24 tells us that “the body” is the CHURCH. So, just because I am not an apostle or a prophet, does not mean that I am less valuable to God. In fact. God makes this very point in 1 Cor. 12. He says, (verse 4) “There are different gifts ( miraculous) but the same Spirit. There are different ministries, but the same Lord. There are different activities, but the same God. Men and women in the body if Christ have different activities, ministries , rolls and work. But that does not make them less valuable or less loved, or less important to God. He says so. This is God’s order. He has the right to make it however HE PLEASES.

God continues to say in verses 14-26…should the “foot” say because he is not the “hand”. he is not as good or useful in the body. The eye (verse 21) cannot say to the hand I don’t need you. You are not important because you are a hand and I am the eye. The “head” cannot say to the “feet”.you are not important. I don’t need you. You are worth less than me. I am loved more than you. No! Do you see the point The Holy Spirit is making? God has given leadership rolls in the “body” to men. No one needs to say that men are more important to God because of this. This does not mean that God loves men more than women. This is why He said what He did in Galations 3:28. Just as all of the different miraculous gifts are by the same spirit (1 Cor. 12:4) and one is not more important than the other, even so, in the church of Christ every person is loved and valued the same by God regardless of their race, sex, or station in life. But this does NOT change what God says in 1 Tim. 2, 1 Cor. 11, 1 Cor. 22 or 1 Cor. 14 “women are to keep silent in the churches. They are not permitted to speak. It is SHAMEFUL for women to speak in the church.” Those are not my words. Those are the words of the Holy Spirit. Those are the words of God. Galations 3:28 does not change, or “cancel out” Genesis 3:16, 1 Corinthians 11;1-3, 12, 14:34-35 or 1 Timothy 2:11-14.

ALL SCRIPTURE IS GIVEN BY INSPIRATION OF GOD…”. 2 Tim. 2:16
Everyone knows Pauls words on women pastors or rather a women speaking or teaching in the church and at face value this would seem pretty clear however the context of the verse has to do with the issues that was going on in the church at the time but what really got me thinking was this right here

Galatians 3:28 states that in Christ Jesus, there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor male nor female, for all are one. This verse emphasizes the equality and unity of believers in Christ, transcending traditional social and cultural divisions. It highlights that these categories, while still present in human society,
are not determinants of value or significance within the Christian community and so this verse got me thinking if this is to be true then why do we take Pauls words at face value he would be contradicting the himself
unless of course he was speaking in regards to what was going on in the church at the time then it would make sense not to mention what about the women who he even baosted about who ministered to people such as Junia?

This one verse just doesn't make sense to me if indeed women are subhuman in the church and Jesus himself never forbid women of such a thing he never even addressed it
Would Jesus forbid the gospel being preached by a women?

In addition to what I’ve already posted about this, I’d like to add that Paul makes it very clear that the things he taught the church at Corinth are the same things he teaches to ALL THE CHURCHES. 1 Cor 4:17. In 7:17, he says what he teaches he ORDAINS. In ALL THE churches. In fact, he addresses the letter of Corinthians to “ the Church of God at Corinth…with ALL who IN EVERY PLACE call on the name of Jesus.. “. This letter is not just for the Corinthians. It is for Christians EVERY WHERE. In chapter 16 he says that what he is telling the Corinthians to do, he has already “ordered” the churches in Galatia to do.

Colossians 4:16- “Now when this letter is read among you, see that it is also read in the church of the Laodiceans, and that you likewise read the letter from Laodicea.”

1 Thess. 5:27- “I CHARGE you by THE LORD that this epistle be read TO ALL OF THE HOLY BRETHREN.

I use these to show that these letters were not only for the church they were addressed to but they were for the whole brotherhood of Christians everywhere. I do not believe that the things Paul wrote about women to the church at Corinth was because they were having trouble with women there or because that was just their “culture” or their particular situation. We have already seen where He says the same thing in his letter to Timothy. He is not addressing a personal problem only for Corinth. But rather, as Paul reminds us in chapter 14:37- “…the things that I write to you are the commandments of the LORD.”
He has already said that He teaches the same things in all the churches 4;17 and 7:17.

There were a few times that Paul did address a particular problem of a specific church. 1 Corinthians 1. he specifically condemns the division at Corinth. Chapter 5, he condemns the adultery they have going on in their congregation; but we are not to imply from that, that adultery any where else would be alright. Or that division in Any other church is ok. So why take chapter 14 and say that the instruction there is just for the Christians in Corinth? No. He does not even imply that it was just for them and not anyone else. If it was wrong for Corinth, it woujd be wrong for Christians everywhere. If it was wrong in the church at Corinth, it was wrong for all churches of Christ everywhere. What He teaches about God’s hierarchy in chapter 11 did not just apply to the church at Corinth, it was true everywhere!

When there is a scripture that is unpopular with People —like 1 Cor. 14:37 and 1 Tim. 2:11-14, there is ALWAYS an effort to find a “loop hole” or a way to get “around” it, so that we can continue to do what we want or please ourselves; maybe it’s an effort of preachers to make the gospel of Christ more appealing to people and easier to “preach.” I don’t know. One thing I am sure of , it is one of Satan’s “devices”. 2 Cor. 2:11
 
Jun 30, 2015
26,203
14,165
113
#29
I will probably add more later, but for now, just this one thought:

The grammatically correct term is “female pastor”, not “woman pastor”. You wouldn’t say “My church has a man pastor”. As an aside, “woman doctor” is also wrong.
 

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
874
369
63
#30
if it is the same value but different roles is that really the same value? anf what about people who came to Christ from women pastors? my friend from Texas attended a church and this women pastor was preaching powerfully and it awoke something in him strongly he literally fell to the floor right then and there repenting and accepting God into his life he now is a pastor himself all because of this one women
What Paul wrote in 1 Cor. 14 was for leadership in public worship. Verse 23 says when the WHOLE CHURCH COMES TOGETHER, and verse 26, “whenever you come together”. This is a public assembly. A woman is forbidden to take a leadership role, that not only means preaching or teaching publicly, it also means “leading” a prayer in the public assembly. But that does not mean she can’t teach privately. That does not mean that she can’t pray privately. I know that because we have a scripture where a husband -wife team taught a man in Acts 18:24-26. Also, women are commanded to teach the young women Titus 2:4; and they can teach children as Timothy’s mother and grandmother taught him in 2 Tim1. You can only get the “truth” by putting ALL of the New Testament together. Just as God gives “guide lines” to the command not to teach, he also gives us “guidelines” for being silent; he tells all Christians to “sing” in such passages as Eph 5;29 and Col. 3:16. So it is considered alright for women to sing in the assembly—but another guideline is that whatever she does she should not usurp authority OVER a man. This is why she is forbidden leadership roles.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,667
3,274
113
#31
@Beckworth I apologize but I couldn't read your whole post it strains my eyes to much but I got the gist of it. so if man is to rule over women what is the role of a women within the body of Christ? where do they stand in the church?
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,599
1,026
113
USA-TX
#33
I will probably add more later, but for now, just this one thought:

The grammatically correct term is “female pastor”, not “woman pastor”. You wouldn’t say “My church has a man pastor”. As an aside, “woman doctor” is also wrong.
How about pastoress to go with deaconess?
 
Jul 5, 2023
2,297
886
113
65
Colorado, USA
#35
I have no idea what doctrine you have in mind, but I was merely encouraging your mind to be open and objective when
considering arguments for and against some doctrine.
Arguments will have to be extremely strong when going against tens of centuries of established church doctrine. Arguments in support of that need not be as strong. There really is a difference.
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,599
1,026
113
USA-TX
#36
Arguments will have to be extremely strong when going against tens of centuries of established church doctrine. Arguments in support of that need not be as strong. There really is a difference.
Well, Luther's arguments were extremely strong against the centuries of RC doctrine, but again,
my urging was for objectivity and against bias in all cases without paying attention to what was being discussed.
So, please excuse my interruption and carry on.
 
Jun 28, 2013
4,068
269
83
#39
Paul was giving an answer and an instruction to the church in Galatia. What we need to figure out is, "What was the question Paul was answering?" We can't properly understand Paul's instruction unless we know the context.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
20,667
3,274
113
#40
Paul was giving an answer and an instruction to the church in Galatia. What we need to figure out is, "What was the question Paul was answering?" We can't properly understand Paul's instruction unless we know the context.
Exactly context is key in this discussion and what Paul was addressing had to do with what was going on in the church at the time if we read the full chapter and not just take the verses out of context we understand what he was adressing and talking about.