John 3:16 tell us.
I spoke of walking in it, the Truth. What would you call someone who acknowledges it as Truth and walks in it?
The "power of the gospel" is grammatically self- evident.
The seed is the gospel and the condition of the soil is reflective of the receptiveness of the heart, as explained within the context of Matthew 13, starting at vv. 18
>along the path; hears but doesn't comprehend it (though, personally, I prefer it better translated, 'consider it') so evil (lies) come and easily snatch it away. That is, in that particular heart, it's left lying there, open rather than 'settled' in.
>rocky ground; hears and lets it "settle" (hence the joy) but its only superficially, settled within the 'cracks' the rocks but it doesn't take root and when trouble comes, wind, heat, what have you, it falls away.
>among the thorns; hears the word but worries of this life and deceitfulness of wealth choke the word and it becomes unfruitful. This seems self-explanatory or, at the least, is elaborated with Jesus directive to worry for nothing (know God cares for you) and who isn't familiar with the "deceitfulness of wealth" to lead to the belief that one has all they need as long as they have wealth?
>good soil; hears and understands it (again, I prefer it translated "considers" it, as "considering" anything offers it implies more than a mere head bobbing and then dismissive shrug). For example, do you considered the possibility of aliens by approaching the subject with, "It might be true, it might be a myth"? or does one ever really consider anything if they approach it thinking, "this can't possibly be true"?
I spoke of walking in it, the Truth. What would you call someone who acknowledges it as Truth and walks in it?
The "power of the gospel" is grammatically self- evident.
The seed is the gospel and the condition of the soil is reflective of the receptiveness of the heart, as explained within the context of Matthew 13, starting at vv. 18
>along the path; hears but doesn't comprehend it (though, personally, I prefer it better translated, 'consider it') so evil (lies) come and easily snatch it away. That is, in that particular heart, it's left lying there, open rather than 'settled' in.
>rocky ground; hears and lets it "settle" (hence the joy) but its only superficially, settled within the 'cracks' the rocks but it doesn't take root and when trouble comes, wind, heat, what have you, it falls away.
>among the thorns; hears the word but worries of this life and deceitfulness of wealth choke the word and it becomes unfruitful. This seems self-explanatory or, at the least, is elaborated with Jesus directive to worry for nothing (know God cares for you) and who isn't familiar with the "deceitfulness of wealth" to lead to the belief that one has all they need as long as they have wealth?
>good soil; hears and understands it (again, I prefer it translated "considers" it, as "considering" anything offers it implies more than a mere head bobbing and then dismissive shrug). For example, do you considered the possibility of aliens by approaching the subject with, "It might be true, it might be a myth"? or does one ever really consider anything if they approach it thinking, "this can't possibly be true"?
- 1
- Show all