As long as you refuse to even look at what was done, there's nothing more to discuss. Ignorance can be overcome, deliberate willful ignorance can't.I don't need to read them
As long as you refuse to even look at what was done, there's nothing more to discuss. Ignorance can be overcome, deliberate willful ignorance can't.I don't need to read them
Generally I don't pay any attention to your posts and I think many others are doing the same. But on this post that I did respond to I was explaining why you can say that Audits have been done until you are blue in the face and no one is paying any attention to you. Find someone credible.Honestly, I'm kinda getting tired of repeating this.....lots and lots of audits in several states were done, some by Trump-picked entities.
I am concerned about the talk of civil war, that is what I am focused on. Convincing me of some trivial topic is absurd, the goal should be to reconcile the country and if that is not the goal then you are simply involved in a hoodwink. Not interested.As long as you refuse to even look at what was done, there's nothing more to discuss. Ignorance can be overcome, deliberate willful ignorance can't.
And if they don't want to do that?
Again, if your approach is that you will only accept what Bannon and Lindell tell you, even on matters that you could easily look into yourself, I have nothing more to add.Generally I don't pay any attention to your posts and I think many others are doing the same. But on this post that I did respond to I was explaining why you can say that Audits have been done until you are blue in the face and no one is paying any attention to you. Find someone credible.
You tell us that "some Trump picked entities" did the audits. Bannon was a Trump picked entity and he would certainly report on such an audit. Mike Lindell is actively involved in working with every state government, all 50 of them, to make the voting process more secure and restore trust.
So if you are telling us the truth either Mike Lindell or Bannon would have reported on these "audits" done by "Trump entities". Share a link from them, they are credible, you are not.
So now we're back to what I said before....civil war, and that brings me back to what I expressed earlier. I'm just fine living alongside people of different backgrounds, faiths, political views, and the like.Well there's always revolution or elsewise just lying flat and being ground down by the misrule of the wicked until God just wipes them wholly.
So now we're back to what I said before....civil war, and that brings me back to what I expressed earlier. I'm just fine living alongside people of different backgrounds, faiths, political views, and the like.
I see no need at all to start a "revolution" where people are killed.
Well that exposes what a fraud your claim is. The highest rated news podcast that has election integrity as a top priority and you told us that "Trump entities" did the audit and yet you can't provide a link from Bannon's newscast? Not credible. That explains why you can keep talking till you are blue in the face and no one will listen.Again, if your approach is that you will only accept what Bannon and Lindell tell you, even on matters that you could easily look into yourself, I have nothing more to add.
I'm not following.No, no one said civil war except for you. You should try to actually read what people write instead of trying to twist it to your own idea. Revolution, like national divorce, isn't the most ideal solution, but it's better than being ground down by the misrule of the wicked and smote by God.
I'm not following.
If some states want a divorce and other states don't, and it results in a revolution, how is that not a civil war? Who is carrying out the revolution and who are they fighting?
Thanks for explaining.A revolution would just be a change of the government by the people, this does not neccessarily mean there would be war, though of course there could be in the event that it is a revolution with a war then it would just be the illegitimates versus the people. A civil war is two or more factions fighting to seize the government, in this scenario which you propose it would be a political based civil war probably democrats versus republicans. The national divorce theory is basically an amicable peaceful resolution where the illegitimate problem states could form their own country or countries, in essence America could continue and the blue states could become one or more countries on their own. Then of course don't ignore the final possibility here where the wicked just seize power, the people being either so wicked themselves or so demoralized do not rise up, and so you just lie flat and get ground down some more and continue to be wicked until God just wipes the society wholly as he has done many many times in both the Bible and more widely history.
Thanks for explaining.
Alabama Secretary Of State Finds 3,000 Potential Noncitizens Registered To VoteWell that exposes what a fraud your claim is. The highest rated news podcast that has election integrity as a top priority and you told us that "Trump entities" did the audit and yet you can't provide a link from Bannon's newscast? Not credible. That explains why you can keep talking till you are blue in the face and no one will listen.
As noted in the article, that number could include people who became citizens after being assigned a noncitizen ID number.Alabama Secretary Of State Finds 3,000 Potential Noncitizens Registered To Vote
https://thefederalist.com/2024/08/1...000-potential-noncitizens-registered-to-vote/
So they became registered voters prior to becoming a citizen. How does that work?As noted in the article, that number could include people who became citizens after being assigned a noncitizen ID number.