Could Trump do anything to make you stop supporting him?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Susanna said:
I don’t get this. In most states both the prosecution and the defense have an equal right to dismiss jurors they don’t want to be part of the jury.
Click to expand...

Each side has a certain number of strikes they can use through the selection process.
 
posthuman said:
Why didnt he testify in court?

Because he is famous the world over for blatantly lying, and that works great at his rallies, but in court it damns him.

He hired very clever, very expensive lawyers - not fools - and they knew that if they had any chance of preventing him from being condemned by his sin, the last thing they want him to do in a court of law is open his mouth.
Click to expand...

The defendant makes the decision, his lawyers cannot stop him/her and he is supposed to be told it is his/her choice. but I am sure he was heavily advised not too, yet I am surprised he did not, that would have been something.

But again I think you are right, I actually think he is self-aware enough to know he would not do well with an aggressive prosecutor and not be able to stay on script.

For a math guy, you know I am a little taken aback by your use of the word "sin" in this context of politics. :unsure:
 
Susanna said:
You’re deflecting again. This is common knowledge and you’re just rephrasing what I said.
Click to expand...
What she was implying is that in a New York city jury pool where 95% voted for Biden, it is likely that the defense will have far more perspective jurors to object to.
If 95% of perspective jurors are disfavorable in any jurisdiction, it's difficult to see how this is a jury of one's peers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PennEd and cv5
Cameron143 said:
What she was implying is that in a New York city jury pool where 95% voted for Biden, it is likely that the defense will have far more perspective jurors to object to.
If 95% of perspective jurors are disfavorable in any jurisdiction, it's difficult to see how this is a jury of one's peers.
Click to expand...

That is a certainty and a reality.

Glad someone understood the question!
 
Cameron143 said:
What she was implying is that in a New York city jury pool where 95% voted for Biden, it is likely that the defense will have far more perspective jurors to object to.
If 95% of perspective jurors are disfavorable in any jurisdiction, it's difficult to see how this is a jury of one's peers.
Click to expand...

How was the outcome of the motion for a change of venue?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back