Yahshua, let's clarify a few things.
1.) Please don't accuse me of saying things I didn't say.... lets treat each other fairly. Ok?
2.) Specifically, I never said "Israel is good and Palestinians are bad."
3.) I would never claim a piece of evidence is bad MERELY because of who presented it.
(However, there is a caveat in cases where we have no substantiation EXCEPT eyewitness testimony. When a piece of evidence, or a claim, has no substantiation EXCEPT an eyewitness, then the character of the witness must be considered, because there is simply no other way to weigh the evidence. Sometimes in this Israel/Palestine debate, on some occasions, we have ONLY eyewitness testimony, and in such cases we are logically compelled to consider the character of the eyewitness.)
4.) The arguments above are NOT arguments I made in rebutting any of your evidences... so please don't accuse me of doing things in ways I did not.
5.) I took the time to genuinely look over what you presented... and I simply found no substantiated evidence.
A. UNSUBSTANTIATED:
In both cases, the video and the article, I took the time to actually look at them, and then reported what I saw - that the claims were entirely unsubstantiated. I found zero documented data points of any kind.
B.) VIDEO:
I could make a dark video, of an unknown place, with no visible landmarks, and unknown people talking, without even showing their faces so you can't tell if they're even real people, and I could claim it means virtually anything... and I could make it in 5 minutes from my basement. That video simply didn't contrain proof or evidence of anything.
C.) ARTICLE:
The article simply gave no evidence. There were no names and identifiers of actual witnesses, no documentation of incidents, no documentation of anything. It was just a page of claims, with no evidence.
6. Conclusion:
I didn't claim the sovereign state of Israel is perfect and does no wrong; I merely claimed that the evidences you presented were not good evidences.
Have a great week.
.
1
