Post 1549 has my questions.
And what I meant in my response was that you asked me to believe the scripture in question. That's what I asked of you. God gave them the land. It was Israel themselves who didn't appropriate it for themselves. Nevertheless, God stated very clearly in scripture that He had fulfilled His promise concerning the land. And my point was that here you accept the plain rendering of scripture and in that case you do not. It is the very thing you and others have claimed of others. And my point in doing so isn't to point out any wrongdoing on your part or theirs, but merely point out that we all go beyond the apparent meaning of scripture when we believe it doesn't harmonize to us with other paasages.
And what I meant in my response was that you asked me to believe the scripture in question. That's what I asked of you. God gave them the land. It was Israel themselves who didn't appropriate it for themselves. Nevertheless, God stated very clearly in scripture that He had fulfilled His promise concerning the land. And my point was that here you accept the plain rendering of scripture and in that case you do not. It is the very thing you and others have claimed of others. And my point in doing so isn't to point out any wrongdoing on your part or theirs, but merely point out that we all go beyond the apparent meaning of scripture when we believe it doesn't harmonize to us with other paasages.
No, it isn't. The Scripture I gave you means exactly what it says. Full stop. The Scripture you gave me is in question simply because Israel has never had the full amount of land. Maps show this to be fact. So I don't disbelieve Scripture. I believe to that point God kept His promise, I believe that He will continue to fulfill it till all the land He promised they possess. I'm not disagreeing, I'm it's not finished yet. You are disagreeing with what the verses say.