Predestination is misunderstood...
- Thread starter Genez
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
tEi gar kariti (For by grace) este (you are, pl. ) sesOsmenoi (having been saved: perfect passive participle) dia tEs piseOs (through faith) kai touto (and that) ouk (not) ex humOn (out of you) theou (of God) to dOron (the gift).
For by means of grace you were saved and are continuing to be saved through faith, and that is the gift of God not [originating] from you.
The present perfect passive participle indicates that you were saved in the past by faith and are continuing to be saved in the present by faith. This implies that we must be believing in the past to be saved in the past, and we must be believing in the present to continue to be saved in the present.
As an example, part way through fighting a forest fire the firemen are told, "You have been protected from the fire by your fire-proof suits, and you didn't provide them yourselves, they were provided to you by the fire department."
Is their "having been protected by the fire-proof suits" transitory, or permanent? Clearly having been protected up to now depended on wearing the suits. And continuing to be in that protected state depends on continuing to wear the suits. And taking off the suit means one will lose their protection from the fire.
For by means of grace you were saved and are continuing to be saved through faith, and that is the gift of God not [originating] from you.
The present perfect passive participle indicates that you were saved in the past by faith and are continuing to be saved in the present by faith. This implies that we must be believing in the past to be saved in the past, and we must be believing in the present to continue to be saved in the present.
As an example, part way through fighting a forest fire the firemen are told, "You have been protected from the fire by your fire-proof suits, and you didn't provide them yourselves, they were provided to you by the fire department."
Is their "having been protected by the fire-proof suits" transitory, or permanent? Clearly having been protected up to now depended on wearing the suits. And continuing to be in that protected state depends on continuing to wear the suits. And taking off the suit means one will lose their protection from the fire.
Are you serious, King James already translated the Bible to English a long time ago.
Why on earth would go and do something silly like study those languages. The only reason anyone ever appeals to those translations is because they have an agenda and they use those languages to build a false theology.
A wise man takes advantage of all the knowledge, which the Church fathers passed down to us over millennia. There's nothing new for us to discover in the 21'st century.
God said all things remain the same, there is nothing new under the sun, but wise guys always seek new things. God said "they are always learning but never coming to the knowledge of the Lord".
Why on earth would go and do something silly like study those languages. The only reason anyone ever appeals to those translations is because they have an agenda and they use those languages to build a false theology.
A wise man takes advantage of all the knowledge, which the Church fathers passed down to us over millennia. There's nothing new for us to discover in the 21'st century.
God said all things remain the same, there is nothing new under the sun, but wise guys always seek new things. God said "they are always learning but never coming to the knowledge of the Lord".
tEi gar kariti (For by the grace) este (you are, pl. ) sesOsmenoi (having been saved: perfect passive participle) dia tEs piseOs (through the faith) kai touto (and that) ouk (not) ex humOn (out of you) theou (of God) to dOron (the gift).
For by means of grace you were saved by faith and are continuing to be saved through faith, and that is the gift of God not [originating] from you.
The present perfect passive participle indicates that you were saved in the past by faith and are continuing to be saved in the present by faith. This implies that we must be believing in the past to be saved in the past, and we must be believing in the present to continue to be saved in the present.
As an example, part way through fighting a forest fire the firemen are told, "You have been protected from the fire by your fire-proof suits, and you didn't provide them yourselves, they were provided to you by the fire department."
Is their "having been protected by the fire-proof suits" transitory, or permanent? Clearly having been protected up to now depended on wearing the suits. And continuing to be in that protected state depends on continuing to wear the suits. And taking off the suit means one will lose their protection from the fire.
For by means of grace you were saved by faith and are continuing to be saved through faith, and that is the gift of God not [originating] from you.
The present perfect passive participle indicates that you were saved in the past by faith and are continuing to be saved in the present by faith. This implies that we must be believing in the past to be saved in the past, and we must be believing in the present to continue to be saved in the present.
As an example, part way through fighting a forest fire the firemen are told, "You have been protected from the fire by your fire-proof suits, and you didn't provide them yourselves, they were provided to you by the fire department."
Is their "having been protected by the fire-proof suits" transitory, or permanent? Clearly having been protected up to now depended on wearing the suits. And continuing to be in that protected state depends on continuing to wear the suits. And taking off the suit means one will lose their protection from the fire.
OK, now you've come out in support of John Calvin. He also taught that "it doesn't matter what good you do" but he didn't only apply it to support a particular view. It was a part of the gospel for him, so it wasn't dispensable.
I must judge everyone according to their fruit in order to obey God. He gave me wisdom, to discern so I don't fall victim to wolves in sheep's clothing. I must judge everyone through the lens of the gospel, and expose false teachers so new converts can take advantage of my wisdom, and not fall for the schemes of the enemy.
I must judge everyone according to their fruit in order to obey God. He gave me wisdom, to discern so I don't fall victim to wolves in sheep's clothing. I must judge everyone through the lens of the gospel, and expose false teachers so new converts can take advantage of my wisdom, and not fall for the schemes of the enemy.
I don't think in terms of losing salvation. Salvation is from some things and to some things. If we fail to avail ourselves of some of the deliverance Jesus is providing and/or some of the blessings he is offering, we are forfeiting those benefits of receiving Him that we were given access to when we believed, for as long as we fail to avail ourselves of them. Salvation is a expansive smorgasbord of elements. And we are necessarily forfeiting them all or experiencing them all at any time.
Full salvation is being fully conformed to Jesus Christ. Being saved is the process of atonement, justification, sanctification and glorification that gets us there. Any step along the way is "being saved".
Full salvation is being fully conformed to Jesus Christ. Being saved is the process of atonement, justification, sanctification and glorification that gets us there. Any step along the way is "being saved".
Adam saw Eve. Adam noticed all kinds of things about Eve. Adam talked with Eve. Adam explored the garden with Eve. Adam knew Eve and had Abel.
Is there not a greater quality of relationship in knowing Eve vs. seeing, observing, accompanying, and conversing with Eve. Doesn't "knowing God" convey a higher quality of relationship with God than hearing about God, thinking about God, and trying to obey what I am told are God's commands?
However, "knowing God" gives no measure of duration. It is either a present reality, in which case I am experiencing aeonous life NOW; or it is not a present reality, in which case I am not experiencing aeonous life now. What is the point of building a theoretical casefor me having something that I am not experiencing anyway?
Is there not a greater quality of relationship in knowing Eve vs. seeing, observing, accompanying, and conversing with Eve. Doesn't "knowing God" convey a higher quality of relationship with God than hearing about God, thinking about God, and trying to obey what I am told are God's commands?
However, "knowing God" gives no measure of duration. It is either a present reality, in which case I am experiencing aeonous life NOW; or it is not a present reality, in which case I am not experiencing aeonous life now. What is the point of building a theoretical casefor me having something that I am not experiencing anyway?
So, you're actually suggesting that sinners need to complete the work which the Lord failed to finish on the cross. That sounds like an entirely different gospel to me, the Lord said "it is finished" but you come along and say "nay Lord, you failed to finish the job", so we need to finish the job for Him.
Your summary doesn't align with the biblical gospel, it may tickle the ears of those who seek to attribute salvation to their good works. But it falls flat on it's face when compared to the biblical gospel.
Your summary doesn't align with the biblical gospel, it may tickle the ears of those who seek to attribute salvation to their good works. But it falls flat on it's face when compared to the biblical gospel.
So, in your estimation. We can take or leave elements of what Christ is offering us, just like a smorgasbord. That flies in the face of scriptures like "Ye shall live by every Word that proceeds from My mouth". You say, no Lord I will choose to obey only those things which I deem to be acceptable And I will reject the rest
