So true! It's not like murderers report their crimes..Good question. I bet no one knows that.
So true! It's not like murderers report their crimes..Good question. I bet no one knows that.
Indeed, you have. According to Deuteronomy 27-28, relying on the Book of the Law is the way to be blessed while not relying on it is the way to be cursed, you should not interpret Galatians 3:10 as quoting from that passage in order to support a point that is arguing against that passage, especially when he considered that passage to be Scripture.Miss the point much?
Jesus set a prefect example for us to follow of how to walk in obedience to the Torah, and in Matthew 11:28-30, he was inviting people to come to him for rest and to learn from him, not inviting people to refuse to learn from his example. Moreover, by Jesus saying that we would find rest for our souls, he was referencing Jeremiah 6:16-19, where the Torah is described as the good way where we will find rest for our souls. This rest for our souls comes from having faith in God to correctly guide us in how to rightly live through the Torah. The fact that Jesus gave himself to pay the penalty for our sins should make us want to go and sin no more by living in obedience to the Torah, not consider ourselves free to do the things that God has revealed to be sin through the Torah.Whew, Thank Goodness! I’ve been up late all week worrying about this. In fact, I haven’t been able to sleep, with all the worry over possibly breaking any of the laws of the Torah. Is there any relief for me?! If only someone could take away all this worry and fear. If there was only some payment or sacrifice on my behalf, for breaking one of these laws!
What part of "it is impossible to follow the Judaism Jesus practiced" do you not understand?Christ set a sinless example of how to walk in obedience to the Mosaic Law, so why does it make sense to you to think that the way to deny Christ is by following his example instead of by refusing to follow him?
Luke 14:5 And he said to them, “Which of you, having a son or an ox that has fallen into a well on a Sabbath day, will not immediately pull him out?”Where does it say that?
Pretty sad to even think about itSo true! It's not like murderers report their crimes..
Christ set a sinless example for us to follow of how to walk in obedience to the Torah and as his followers we are told to follow his example (1 Peter 2:21-22) and that those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked (1 John 3:4). It should not be strange for some people in a Christian forum to advocate that followers of Christ should follow his example.This is indeed a Christian forum, but you will see from this thread that some people who believe themselves to be Christians are advocating that Christians must obey the entire Torah. Don’t blame me for the stupid stuff that others post.
What is strange is that you acknowledge on the one hand that it is impossible to follow Judaism as Jesus practiced it, while at the same time claiming that we should practice the same religion that Jesus did/walk as He did.It should not be strange for some people in a Christian forum to advocate that followers of Christ should follow his example.
Arranged marriages are certainly not the evil that is promoted in Hollywood. Being infatuated with someone clouds our judgement and can cause us to ignore red flags that a 3rd party would not overlook. There are advantages for young people to lean on wisdom of their parents and trust them to make a good choice about whom to marry. There are certainly pros and cons to each.Maybe we should go back to arranged marriages.
from "several research groups"
In the United States, while the divorce rate hovers around 40 or 50 percent, the divorce rate for arranged marriages is 4 percent.
Nov 2, 2023
I don't understand your question. Can you rephrase it?.If we SIN, and all sins have been defined under the Law, is it ok to say according to the definition of sins in the Law my sin fits that category?
Something happened to the quote tag in post #119, so I'm tagging you to make sure that you saw it.You are clearly misinterpreting (at best) or not understanding (at worst).
To whom was Matthew's gospel written? Clearly, it was written to the Jewish people to give them understanding of their Messiah. It was not written to Christians! When He warned against relaxing the least part of it or teaching others to relax the least part of it, that was said before the new covenant was instituted.
Have you forgotten about Romans 6:14? To refresh your memory... "For sin will have no mastery over you, because you are not under law but under grace. "
Or Romans 7:6, "But now we have been released from the law, because we have died to what controlled us, so that we may serve in the new life of the Spirit and not under the old written code."
If, as a Christian, you put yourself under the OT law, YOU ARE DENYING CHRIST!
You know, you figure this was a Christian forum and then you encounter garbage like this, where people are on here are apparently not even saved. The posters on this thread don’t even know that Jesus lived and died for our sins. I guess we need to go back through Romans 3:23, 5:8, 6:23, 10:9-10, 10:13.I think the issue is are Christians still under the law. If we are my neighbor is gonna be missin' her goat tonight and a couple fowl.![]()
What part of we should follow Christ's example to the extent that we are able to don't you understand?What part of "it is impossible to follow the Judaism Jesus practiced" do you not understand?
I’m not missing anything. YOU are still missing the point… badly. You said this:Indeed, you have.
Apparently you don’t have a sense of humour but are happy to make grossly unwarranted assumptions about people of whom you know nothing whatsoever.You know, you figure this was a Christian forum and then you encounter garbage like this, where people are on here are apparently not even saved. The posters on this thread don’t even know that Jesus lived and died for our sins.
I see. So part of the error is in your refusal to amend what you say... until after being called out on it each time you parrot your falsehoods.What part of we should follow Christ's example to the extent that we are able to don't you understand?
Im lightening up, I’m just a little amazed at where the level of spirituality/understanding is - level zero. Oh well, guess if I don’t like it, I don’t need to click on it.Apparently you don’t have a sense of humour but are happy to make grossly unwarranted assumptions about people of whom you know nothing whatsoever.
Lighten up.
Again, there is nothing wrong with not obeying a law that can't currently be obeyed, but that shouldn't stop us from obeying all of the laws that we can obey. Jesus did not obey the laws in regard to having a period or to giving birth, but there is there is no sin or curse in that. According to Deuteronomy 27-28, relying on God's law is the way to be blessed while not relying on it is the way to be cursed, so the point that Pau was making in Galatians 3:10 should be understood in a way that is in accordance with what he was quoting from to support his point, not a way that contradicts what he was quoting from.I’m not missing anything. YOU are still missing the point… badly. You said this:
“ We should follow the Torah to the extent that we are able to obey it and we are not required to obey commands that can't currently be obeyed.”
I quoted Galatians 3:10 which CLEARLY refutes your error. Now instead of admitting that you were dead wrong, you’re sidestepping and changing the subject.