Right.
And even Irenaeus wrote of same, "way back"... but wrote this well-after the events of 70ad:
[quoting Irenaeus]
"[...]
a king of a most fierce countenance shall arise, one understanding [dark] questions, and exceedingly powerful, full of wonders; and he shall corrupt, direct, influence (
faciet), and put strong men down, the
holy people likewise; and his yoke shall be directed as a wreath [round their neck]; deceit shall be in his hand, and he shall be lifted up in his heart: he shall also ruin many by deceit, and lead many to perdition, bruising them in his hand like eggs.
Daniel 8:23, etc.
And then he points out the time that his tyranny shall last, during which the saints shall be put to flight, they who offer a pure sacrifice unto God: And in the midst of the week, he says, the sacrifice and the libation shall be taken away, and the abomination of desolation [shall be brought] into the temple: even unto the consummation of the time shall the desolation be complete.
Daniel 9:27 Now three years and six months constitute the half-week."
--Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5.25.4 -
https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103525.htm
[end quoting Irenaeus; bold and underline mine]
Notice:
--"during which the saints SHALL BE
PUT TO FLIGHT,..." speaks of where it says, "Then let them
WHICH BE IN JUDAEA *
FLEE* to the mountains" (Matt24:16, per v.15; ALSO in Rev12:6,14 "
FLED" and "
FLY"), and verse "20 But pray ye that your
FLIGHT be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: 21 FOR THEN shall be GREAT tribulation..."
Notice that the passage is not saying ANY OTHER SAINTS LOCATED ELSEWHERE on the earth are to do so, only "THEY WHICH BE IN JUDAEA" at the time-slot being spoken of. (Recall that the Matthew section is referring to what takes place FOLLOWING "the beginning of birth pangs"; whereas the Luke 21 section [covering the 70ad events, vv.12-24a,b] speaks of
THAT "flee" as taking place BEFORE ALL "the beginning of birth pangs"--They are completely distinct, occurring at
wholly distinct time-periods: one in 70ad events, the other far-future.)
Now, why would Irenaeus (well after 70ad) be writing about "the temple" (located on the earth) and saints being "put to flight" as a yet-future event, if 70ad was supposed to have been "it"... ?