lol all the gnashing of teeth going on and no one is even backing his idealism or anything else
It isn't the manner of debate that is the problem. It's a matter of truth. He has already stated that scripture isn't the final word for understanding and doctrine. It's difficult enough to work through scripture and come to a consensus. But if people aren't working from a common set of information, how can they reach the same conclusions?lol all the gnashing of teeth going on and no one is even backing his idealism or anything else
he is WRONG, but, he ain't going to get that from how it can be debated here.It isn't the manner of debate that is the problem. It's a matter of truth. He has already stated that scripture isn't the final word for understanding and doctrine. It's difficult enough to work through scripture and come to a consensus. But if people aren't working from a common set of information, how can they reach the same conclusions?
I did. But because you don't know what part of Scripture talks about that, let me repeat -
Jeremiah 31:31-34 -
31 “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant that I made with their fathers (meaning the Old Covenant will be done with) on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. 33 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.”
Ezekiel 36:24-28 -
24 For I will take you from among the nations, gather you out of all countries, and bring you into your own land. 25 Then I will sprinkle clean water on you, and you shall be clean; I will cleanse you from all your filthiness and from all your idols. 26 I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; I will take the heart of stone out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. 27 I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will keep My judgments and do them. 28 Then you shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers; you shall be My people, and I will be your God.
I'm not sure he would get it anywhere.he is WRONG, but, he ain't going to get that from how it can be debated here.
i can't even disagree with that even if i wanted toI'm not sure he would get it anywhere.
It isn't the manner of debate that is the problem. It's a matter of truth. He has already stated that scripture isn't the final word for understanding and doctrine. It's difficult enough to work through scripture and come to a consensus. But if people aren't working from a common set of information, how can they reach the same conclusions?
Oh my gosh. You are irredeemable. It clearly states that that is the New Covenant and Paul says that has started in Hebrews 8:8 through Jesus. That's my point - that is the Millennial reign. But that is the New Covenant.
I understand what you say but I think DavidIsrael may be right on many things he discussed.i get the idea he thinks he is.
Oh my gosh. You are irredeemable. It clearly states that that is the New Covenant and Paul says that has started in Hebrews 8:8 through Jesus. That's my point - that is the Millennial reign. But that is the New Covenant.
Lets not not forget that the truth is not pleasing to everyone, I urge you to then prove wrongdoing before passing judgment if is the only way to go.
I definitely agree. But I try to understand why people believe what they believe. In this case, the individual gives weight to only part of scripture and considers other things as more authoritative than scripture. Herein lies his error. So debating over scripture will never convince him. He has a higher authority.“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.”
2 Timothy 3:16-17 KJV
if we won’t hear what god actually said and caused himself to be written down instructing men like Moses or the ot prophets or the apostles what to say and what to write down for everyone to hear
awe would just be people creating our own disciples that agree with our own philosophy in other words the bi le os gods word he caused it to be what it is so all people could hear the gospel
many won’t learn from the Bible because they’re trying to teach thier own doctrine
We want to be like Paul and explain all this stuff that no one else knew before …..but that’s not how it works we have to hear and believe what he said and sent to us just my unwarranted thought
Why come to a bible discussion forum if we don’t agree with what it plainly says the New Testament is plain it’s not meant to be interpreted just listened to and learned from and followed after because we have faith we heard and believed ….
if you follow what i asked him, i could see what he might be saying like his reference to the Old Testament not being fulfilled wasn't the Law he was discussing, but future End Time Prophecy.I understand what you say but I think DavidIsrael may be right on many things he discussed.
Blessings