We are not yet in the New Covenant prophecied by Jeremiah and Ezekiel - that is the Millennial reign

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

selahsays

Well-known member
May 31, 2023
2,796
1,484
113
You will share the truth of Jesus Christ and the coherent picture of the Bible despite the incoherence that Paul brings about? I hope you know what truth, lies and half-truths mean. Why are so many of you coming here and not giving me a single proper argument? This is like the High Priests getting riled up by one man - Jesus. No one was properly arguing with Jesus. It was Jesus who was constantly bringing more and more points to reconsider.
So God was wrong to choose Paul? Sorry, I trust the LORD, not what you have to say. It is written.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,609
113
"Paul wrote what the Holy Spirit moved him to write. "

Lol, funny you say this - "and I think myself also to have the Spirit of God. " - 1 Corinthians 7:40 .

He literally writes in the Bible that he has doubts. Lol.


"He didn't get anything wrong. " - I am waiting to hear a counter argument to my rejection of Paul's theories of the New Covenant.

"He is the Word of God. That means if you reject the writings of Paul, you also reject Christ. "

False equivalence. He is the Word but you are assuming that that Word includes Paul's writings which were canonized decades later. Jesus is the Word meaning OT. The Law and the Prophets specifically. Not even the Ketuvim.
I THINK - a common expression:

The expression "I think myself also to have the spirit of God" does not necessitate doubt by Paul.
This is just a figure of speech.
It is a humble, almost self effacing way, of making a claim of oneself... as was common at the time.

We often use the very same expression (I think) in modern times, but often in a humorous way.
If you're a mechanic and somebody asks if you know how to work on a car, you might grin and say, "I think I know how to work on a car."

Using the word "think" before a statement doesn't have to imply doubt.
It's a common way of speaking, and we still do it today.



To Dispel Any Doubt:

There are other passages that clearly say Paul has the spirit of God.


.
 

TabinRivCA

Well-known member
Oct 23, 2018
13,229
10,764
113
You will share the truth of Jesus Christ and the coherent picture of the Bible despite the incoherence that Paul brings about? I hope you know what truth, lies and half-truths mean. Why are so many of you coming here and not giving me a single proper argument? This is like the High Priests getting riled up by one man - Jesus. No one was properly arguing with Jesus. It was Jesus who was constantly bringing more and more points to reconsider.
'You will share the truth of Jesus Christ and the coherent picture of the Bible despite the incoherence that Paul brings about?'

The key to everything is Jesus Christ. Paul served his purpose and trying to cut him down isn't my quest.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
Shalom DavidIsrael

After Yeshua died on the Cross, was placed in a Burial Tomb, Resurrected to His Original State as the WORD, then Ascended, now is Positioned at the Right Hand of Power, do you think Yeshua was Crowned King of kings and Lord of lords, at this point in time?
 
Nov 28, 2023
67
1
8
This prophecy will be fulfilled in the Millennium. Don’t confuse it with the New Covenant.
Oh my gosh. You are irredeemable. It clearly states that that is the New Covenant and Paul says that has started in Hebrews 8:8 through Jesus. That's my point - that is the Millennial reign. But that is the New Covenant.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,080
6,883
113
62
Oh my gosh. You are irredeemable. It clearly states that that is the New Covenant and Paul says that has started in Hebrews 8:8 through Jesus. That's my point - that is the Millennial reign. But that is the New Covenant.
She probably shops at Walmart too. Or is that only true of us deplorables?
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
Oh my gosh. You are irredeemable. It clearly states that that is the New Covenant and Paul says that has started in Hebrews 8:8 through Jesus. That's my point - that is the Millennial reign. But that is the New Covenant.
1. not everyone has the same Scriptural Understanding
2. no one has presented You any False Doctrine that cannot be backed by Scripture
3. we're Family in God

Now, i understand your approach because this is what's done in Synagogue and between discussing Torah/Tanakh
this is how Yeshua would have discussed things in His Day
He called them Vipers and full of dead man's bones because they were presenting the Law and their ""personal interpretation"" of the Law.
but on American Debate Boards, they see this as being hostile, even though, for the Jews, they believe they're debating on the level of Life and Death.

this is "friendly advice."
unfortunately, a Jew, even a Messianic Jew, is not allowed to be themselves on these Forums.

Pretend to be American, and it will go better for You (y)
 

selahsays

Well-known member
May 31, 2023
2,796
1,484
113
Oh my gosh. You are irredeemable. It clearly states that that is the New Covenant and Paul says that has started in Hebrews 8:8 through Jesus. That's my point - that is the Millennial reign. But that is the New Covenant.
…but the Millennial reign doesn’t begin until the Second Coming of Christ.
 

ThyKingdomComeSoon

Well-known member
Apr 1, 2023
974
596
93
1. not everyone has the same Scriptural Understanding
2. no one has presented You any False Doctrine that cannot be backed by Scripture
3. we're Family in God

Now, i understand your approach because this is what's done in Synagogue and between discussing Torah/Tanakh
this is how Yeshua would have discussed things in His Day
He called them Vipers and full of dead man's bones because they were presenting the Law and their ""personal interpretation"" of the Law.
but on American Debate Boards, they see this as being hostile, even though, for the Jews, they believe they're debating on the level of Life and Death.

this is "friendly advice."
unfortunately, a Jew, even a Messianic Jew, is not allowed to be themselves on these Forums.

Pretend to be American, and it will go better for You (y)
What you said is a call to censorship, this is a discussion forum, he is just expressing an opinion based on scripture.

Peace!
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
the Guy is used to debating the same way they've been debating going on basically 4,000 years.
they're really thick skinned people.
probably can't wrap his brain around how it's done here.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
What you said is a call to censorship, this is a discussion forum, he is just expressing an opinion based on scripture.

Peace!
ever been in a yiddish synagogue in Israel and observed after the reading of the Torah and Prophets?


15 And after the reading of the law and the prophets, the rulers of the synagogue sent to them saying: Men, brethren, if there is in you any word of exhortation for the people, speak.

8 But he entered the synagogue and spoke boldly
 

ThyKingdomComeSoon

Well-known member
Apr 1, 2023
974
596
93
ever been in a yiddish synagogue in Israel and observed after the reading of the Torah and Prophets?


15 And after the reading of the law and the prophets, the rulers of the synagogue sent to them saying: Men, brethren, if there is in you any word of exhortation for the people, speak.

8 But he entered the synagogue and spoke boldly
Speaking boldly is a good thing as long as it is the truth! the truth must prevail above all!

Peace.
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
5,075
1,279
113
Okay, I do agree that Paul is an Apostle of G-d. I am not like some fanatics who calls Paul a false prophet or whatever. Even I quote Paul quite often - as seen above.

But when are you going to argue against my claims against Paul's writings?

It's too long of a thread but I will address them if you wish to post them into a reply. Also, you can't accept someone as an Apostle but think their writings are in error.
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
5,075
1,279
113
I quoted the verse. Maybe it wasn't clear enough -

"and I think myself also to have the Spirit of God. " - 1 Corinthians 7:40

Why does he only "think" he has the Holy Spirit? I agree that all of us have doubts but if he is more important than the others, as known by him as you claim, then why does he doubt like the others?

You cannot apply what you know of English to what Paul wrote because he didn't use English. Only a scholar can explain wht Paul is saying:

Clarke:

I think - I have the Spirit of God - Δοκω δε κᾳγω Πνευμα Θεου εχειν might be translated, I am Certain that I have the Spirit of God. This sense of δοκειν (which we translate to seem, to think, to appear, etc.) I have noticed in another part of this work. Ulpian, on Demosthen. Olynth. 1, says, Το δοκειν ου παντως επι αμφιβολου ταττουσιν οἱ παλαιοι αλλα πολλακις και επι του αληθευειν· The word δοκειν is used by the ancients, not always to express what is Doubtful, but often to express what is True and Certain.

Paul isn't saying he isn't positive he has the Holy Spirit but that he is very positive he has the HS. The complete opposite of your non-Greek conclusion.
 
Jun 20, 2022
6,460
1,330
113
i am Jewish myself.
sephardim
born and raised in the USA
we debate differently.
we don't get offended.
shocked at those who do
it is what it is
but it is true you must conduct yourself according to the rules you debate at
that's the point i am trying to make to him
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
20,080
6,883
113
62
It's too long of a thread but I will address them if you wish to post them into a reply. Also, you can't accept someone as an Apostle but think their writings are in error.
Apparently you can. Forget all you thought you knew. There's a new Apostle in chat. And this chat ain't big enough for the both of you. So at noon on the Lord's day...I was going to say Sabbath, but picking up a Bible and opening it up might be considered work if you are sitting on a chair greater than 2 feet in height and pointed any direction but east...there will be a sword drill to see who must get out of Dodge.
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
14,661
5,908
113
Paul wrote what the Holy Spirit moved him to write. He didn't get anything wrong. That should be your starting place.
You say you follow Jesus. He is the Word of God. That means if you reject the writings of Paul, you also reject Christ.
Exact same for those who reject Peter John or James
 
Status
Not open for further replies.