There is a huge difference between these two positions:
1.) Our salvation requires us to be obeyers of God.
2.) Our salvation requires us to have first done a certain amount of obedience to God in order to earn it as the result as though it were a wage.
In Romans 2:13, only doers of the law will be justified, in Matthew 7:23, Jesus said that he would tell those who are workers of lawlessness to depart from him because he never knew them, and in Hebrews 5:9, Jesus has become a source of eternal salvation for those who obey him, so while there are many verses like these that support #1, there are also many verses that deny #2, so there must be a reason why our salvation requires us to choose to be doers of the law other than in order to earn it as a wage. The problem is that when someone says something in support of #1, people tend think to mistake that as supporting #2 and will argue against #1 by citing verses that only speak against #2.
Every example of faith listed in Hebrews 11 is an example of works, un Psalms 119:29 and Exodus 33:13, they wanted God to be gracious to them by teaching them to obey His law, and in 1 John 2:6, those who are in Christ are obligated to walk in the same way he walked, so salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone is not apart from works, but it is apart from works done for the purpose of earning it as a wage. In Romans 3:27-31, while we are justified by faith apart from works done for the purpose of earning our justification (by faith alone), the faith by which are are justified does not abolish our need to obey God's law, but rather our faith upholds it (so faith is not alone apart from works, just alone apart from works done to earn our justification as a wage). This is why Luther said that an idle faith is not a justifying faith and saw that as being in accordance with the 5 Solas.