I guess that was to me? I suppose you should look up the false dichotomy fallacy.Nothing about your comment makes any sense.
I guess that was to me? I suppose you should look up the false dichotomy fallacy.Nothing about your comment makes any sense.
Post# 6741 - 6742 - 6750 - 6759.What question was that? .![]()
The answer about the false dichotomy is on Post# 6747.I guess that was to me? I suppose you should look up the false dichotomy fallacy.
I didn't ask any questions in any of those posts, except 6759 asking what question you were answering. What are you on about?Post# 6741 - 6742 - 6750 - 6759.
The question is on post# 6742. You agreed with the question, I simply answered the question on post# 6750.I didn't ask any questions in any of those posts, except 6759 asking what question you were answering. What are you on about?
In fact my posts to you here recently had to do with whether or not it was grammatically correct to start
a sentence with a pronoun. I responded because you made such a big deal of it as if it were wrong.
You should read the parable before the statement you quoted. The chosen few were the Jews who would not come to the marriage. The many called are the Gentiles from the highways and byways, who filled the feast after the ones chosen refused to come.The question is on post# 6742. You agreed with the question, I simply answered the question on post# 6750.
Here is the question: Why do you always follow chosen with few? There is a number in heaven that no man can number. The promise to Abraham was as the stars in the sky and grains of sand.
Here is the answer:
For many are called but few are chosen. (Matthew 22:14)
To Cameron143, NightTwister and Magenta, if the above verse does not answer your question, what more can I say?
Cameron143 seems to think that many are chosen not few.
I didn't ask any questions in any of those posts, except 6759 asking what question you were answering. What are you on about?
In fact my posts to you here recently had to do with whether or not it was grammatically correct to start
a sentence with a pronoun. I responded because you made such a big deal of it as if it were wrong.
I already addressed this.I already replied to this issue on post# 6740.
The issue is Brightframe52's unwillingness to simply label the antecedent of the "it" in his response. Can you not see this?
No, he really didn't say that.The question is on post# 6742. You agreed with the question, I simply answered the question on post# 6750.
Here is the question: Why do you always follow chosen with few? There is a number in heaven that no man can number. The promise to Abraham was as the stars in the sky and grains of sand.
Here is the answer:
For many are called but few are chosen. (Matthew 22:14)
To Cameron143, NightTwister and Magenta, if the above verse does not answer your question, what more can I say?
Cameron143 seems to think that many are chosen not few.
Using the REPLY option really helps us know who you're talking to.Post# 6741 - 6742 - 6750 - 6759.
The question...who's image is on the coin?...should have led them to the consideration of who's image was on each of them and what was due to the One who's image they bore.Matthew 22
Easy-to-Read Version
A Story About People Invited to a Dinner
22 Jesus used some more stories to teach the people. He said, 2 “God’s kingdom is like a king who prepared a wedding feast for his son. 3 He invited some people to the feast. When it was ready, the king sent his servants to tell the people to come. But they refused to come to the king’s feast.
4 “Then the king sent some more servants. He said to them, ‘I have already invited the people. So tell them that my feast is ready. I have killed my best bulls and calves to be eaten. Everything is ready. Come to the wedding feast.’
5 “But when the servants told the people to come, they refused to listen. They all went to do other things. One went to work in his field, and another went to his business. 6 Some of the other people grabbed the servants, beat them, and killed them. 7 The king was very angry. He sent his army to kill those who murdered his servants. And the army burned their city.
8 “After that the king said to his servants, ‘The wedding feast is ready. I invited those people, but they were not good enough to come to my feast. 9 So go to the street corners and invite everyone you see. Tell them to come to my feast.’ 10 So the servants went into the streets. They gathered all the people they could find, good and bad alike, and brought them to where the wedding feast was ready. And the place was filled with guests.
11 “When the king came in to meet the guests, he saw a man there who was not dressed in the right clothes for a wedding. 12 The king said, ‘Friend, how were you allowed to come in here? You are not wearing the right clothes.’ But the man said nothing. 13 So the king told some servants, ‘Tie this man’s hands and feet. Throw him out into the darkness, where people are crying and grinding their teeth with pain.’
14 “Yes, many people are invited. But only a few are chosen.”
The Jewish Leaders Try to Trick Jesus
15 Then the Pharisees left the place where Jesus was teaching. They made plans to catch him saying something wrong. 16 They sent some men to Jesus. They were some of their own followers and some from the group called Herodians. They said, “Teacher, we know you are an honest man. We know you teach the truth about God’s way. You are not afraid of what others think about you. All people are the same to you. 17 So tell us what you think. Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?”
18 But Jesus knew that these men were trying to trick him. So he said, “You hypocrites! Why are you trying to catch me saying something wrong? 19 Show me a coin used for paying the tax.” They showed Jesus a silver coin. 20 Then he asked, “Whose picture is on the coin? And whose name is written on the coin?”
21 They answered, “It is Caesar’s picture and Caesar’s name.”
Then Jesus said to them, “Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar, and give to God what belongs to God.”
22 When they heard what Jesus said, they were amazed. They left him and went away.
Some Sadducees Try to Trick Jesus
23 That same day some Sadducees came to Jesus. (Sadducees believe that no one will rise from death.) The Sadducees asked Jesus a question. 24 They said, “Teacher, Moses told us that if a married man dies and had no children, his brother must marry the woman. Then they will have children for the dead brother.[a] 25 There were seven brothers among us. The first brother married but died. He had no children. So his brother married the woman. 26 Then the second brother also died. The same thing happened to the third brother and all the other brothers. 27 The woman was the last to die. 28 But all seven men had married her. So when people rise from death, whose wife will she be?”
29 Jesus answered, “You are so wrong! You don’t know what the Scriptures say. And you don’t know anything about God’s power. 30 At the time when people rise from death, there will be no marriage. People will not be married to each other. Everyone will be like the angels in heaven. 31 Surely you have read what God said to you about people rising from death. 32 God said, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.’ So they were not still dead, because he is the God only of living people.”
33 When the people heard this, they were amazed at Jesus’ teaching.
Which Command Is the Most Important?
34 The Pharisees learned that Jesus had made the Sadducees look so foolish that they stopped trying to argue with him. So the Pharisees had a meeting. 35 Then one of them, an expert in the Law of Moses, asked Jesus a question to test him. 36 He said, “Teacher, which command in the law is the most important?”
37 Jesus answered, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the first and most important command. 39 And the second command is like the first: ‘Love your neighbor[d] the same as you love yourself.’[e] 40 All of the law and the writings of the prophets take their meaning from these two commands.”
Is the Messiah David’s Son or David’s Lord?
41 So while the Pharisees were together, Jesus asked them a question. 42 He said, “What do you think about the Messiah? Whose son is he?”
The Pharisees answered, “The Messiah is the Son of David.”
43 Jesus said to them, “Then why did David call him ‘Lord’? David was speaking by the power of the Spirit. He said,
44 ‘The Lord God said to my Lord:
Sit by me at my right side,
and I will put your enemies under your control.[f]’
45 David calls the Messiah ‘Lord.’ So how can he be David’s son?”
46 None of the Pharisees could answer Jesus’ question. And after that day, no one was brave enough to ask him any more questions.
Footnotes
- Matthew 22:24 if … dead brother See Deut. 25:5, 6.
- Matthew 22:32 Quote from Ex. 3:6.
- Matthew 22:37 Quote from Deut. 6:5.
- Matthew 22:39 your neighbor Or “others.” Jesus’ teaching in Lk. 10:25-37 makes clear that this includes anyone in need.
- Matthew 22:39 Quote from Lev. 19:18.
- Matthew 22:44 control Literally, “feet.”
In the preceding parable of Chapter 21, the wicked tenants, v. 45 tells us the chief priests and Pharisees knew Jesus was talking about them, and "once again" it was them that Jesus continued in Chapter 22. At the conclusion of Chapter 21, they wanted to arrest him but were afraid of the crowds. So, it seems that the crowds, whether Jew or Gentile being among them, would be included in "everyone they could find, both evil and good."
Sorry, don't understand your point - what you are implying?
If one reads Romans 2:6-8 in isolation from the rest of the book of Romans, one might conclude that Paul was teaching salvation by works. However, as we read and study these passages of scripture, it's critical to keep in mind that these verses do not describe how one becomes saved, but the way the saved (and unsaved) conduct their lives. These works done are the result of, not the means or basis of obtaining salvation. We must not confuse "descriptive" passages of scripture with "prescriptive" passages of scripture.What has yet to be debunked is this
Romans 2:6-8
God “will repay each one according to his deeds.” To those who by perseverance in doing good seek glory, honor, and immortality, He will give eternal life. But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow wickedness, there will be wrath and anger.
The parable concluded that "many are called but few are chosen" so the whole context of the parable examples all those that were called starting the subject with the introduction of those initially called (He came to His own). And yes, Israel was called but even more set apart within Israel and called to serve God were the Levites, of which the chief priests and Pharisees were supposedly descendant of, unless I'm mistaken somewhere in the succession. Anyway, their group, the chief priests and Pharisees, were definitely called but they didn't answer, and indeed mistreated the messengers so that the king (in the parable) destroyed them and their city (perhaps it might be appropriate to consider their 'city' similar to Vatican City, considering their 'community' is the temple, which is indeed eventually destroyed). And they did think to mistreat Jesus except that they feared the crowds "because they look at Jesus as a prophet" (tho the chief priest dismissed him as fraud so, in my view, they didn't have wedding clothes). Now, looking at the crowds that believed Jesus to be a prophet, of whom do you suppose these crowds consisted of? Just Jews? Just Gentiles? or a blend all peoples, both good and evil? I suppose it was a blend of whomsoever chose to follow Jesus, even Greeks, unless the population Jesus was ministering to was only Israel. But that can't be the case if we remember the woman that he insinuated was "a dog" that came to Him.
So, I wasn't trying to imply anything and was attempting to elaborate on my original statement that "all are called," and I daresay that "all" qualifies as "many," but the few chosen are those that 1) answer the call, and not only that but 2) put on their wedding garments.