Angels can procreate

[pottersclay]

Yes, people sinned even before the law was given. But it was not counted as sin because there was not yet any law to break. Romans 5:13

This comment right here is a out right lie. It shows who your dealing with.

 

[HeIsHere]

That's funny. Since angels are in fact messengers from God, and messengers from God are in fact angels, what a quaint observation. It is because they were angels that they had the power and strength to drag Lot and is family out of Sodom.

Yes that is true, I reread the passage, however angels cannot procreate and are not sexual, end of story.

 

[Magenta]

Yes, people sinned even before the law was given. But it was not counted as sin because there was not yet any law to break. Romans 5:13

Does not change the fact that God does not want believers to be yoked to
unbelievers, "... for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods.”

 

[ResidentAlien]

This comment right here is a out right lie. It shows who your dealing with.

If it's a lie, what does Romans 5:13 mean then?

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Yes that is true, I reread the passage, however angels cannot procreate and are not sexual, end of story.

Nowhere in the Genesis 6 Verses does it mention anyone having sex. It says women BORE children. That's a process that doesn't include sex at all.

The entire problem with your viewpoints are you think these things had sex with human women.

Here's a quick question for you:

Why does the Bible specify the women are HUMAN but the men are not?

It plainly says the Women are Human. Why do we need to know the women are human if the men are also human.

The fact the Bible tells us the men and women are different species should tell you if the Bible says women are human but says men are something else. It means, the men ARE NOT HUMAN.

 

[Magenta]

Why does the Bible specify the women are HUMAN but the men are not?

The Bible does not specify that.

 

[HeIsHere]

Nowhere in the Genesis 6 Verses does it mention anyone having sex. It says women BORE children. That's a process that doesn't include sex at all.

The entire problem with your viewpoints are you think these things had sex with human women.

Here's a quick question for you:

Why does the Bible specify the women are HUMAN but the men are not?

I know I would have to go back and read this thread to understand what you are saying here, but please spare that misery, what are you saying the fallen angels impregnated women in some kind of magical way?

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

The Bible does not specify that.

It does so. It doesn't say what the men are, it only says women are HUMAN it does not say men are.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

I know I would have to go back and read this thread to understand what you are saying here, but please spare that misery, what are you saying the fallen angels impregnated women in some kind of magical way?

There is no sex so stop with your conspiracy theories.

And the woman are HUMAN but the men are not. So impossible for them to have sex.

 

[Magenta]

It does so. It doesn't say what the men are, it only says women are HUMAN it does not say men are.

The Bible does not specify that the men are not human.

Kind reproduces after kind. That is specified. Perhaps you overlooked it along with all the others things you overlooked.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

The Bible does not specify that the men are not human.

That is right.

Why say women are HUMAN but Don't tell us what men are?

 

[HeIsHere]

There is no sex so stop with your conspiracy theories.

And the woman are HUMAN but the men are not. So impossible for them to have sex.

Uh, conspiracy theory?

Men are not "human" what are they then?

 

[Magenta]

That is right.

Why say women are HUMAN but Don't tell us what men are?

Sons are God are identified as humans. Certainly no verse says angels took human women as wives.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Uh, conspiracy theory?

Men are not "human" what are they then?

The Bible doesn't say, so how do you know the men are human?

The Bible says women are human.

but not men.

The Bible would tell us if the men were human, because they tell us the women are.

so, if the bible doesn't tell us then they are not HUMAN!

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Sons are God are identified as humans. Certainly no verse says angels took human women as wives.

Not in the Hebrew, which is the Version this Story was told from God to Moses.

In the Hebrew, Sons of God ALWAYS means Angels!

 

[Magenta]

The Bible doesn't say, so how do you know the men are human?
The Bible says women are human.
but not men.
The Bible would tell us if the men were human, because they tell us the women are.
so, if the bible doesn't tell us then they are not HUMAN!

Are you not human then, either?

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

We have to USE every WORD in these Verses God gives to us.

God say's HUMAN WOMEN, but not human men. Clearly, these men are NOT human.

 

[Magenta]

Not in the Hebrew, which is the Version this Story was told from God to Moses.

In the Hebrew, Sons of God ALWAYS means Angels!

God spoke Hebrew to Moses? Where does the Bible say that? .

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

God spoke Hebrew to Moses? Where does the Bible say that? .

What Language do you think God used with the Ancient HEBREW PEOPLE?

 

[Magenta]

The Bible doesn't say, so how do you know the men are human?

The Bible says women are human.

but not men.

The Bible would tell us if the men were human, because they tell us the women are.

so, if the bible doesn't tell us then they are not HUMAN!

Applying your standard here, the Bible would tell us if women were impregnated in vitro.

Applying your standard here, the Bible would tell us if Mary was impregnated the same way you
believe angels impregnated women. Applying your standard here, the Bible would tell us that is
how Jesus was placed into the womb of Mary instead of repeatedly being told she conceived.