CJ Lovik with another prophecy backing up his 2030 return of Jesus
- Thread starter Radius
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I like the 180 degree "turn" answer. To repent, I needed to turn to God, ask for forgiveness, and surrender my life to Him.
It's no longer about my selfish and sinful ways. It is accepting Jesus into my heart, so He can turn me into a child of God from the inside out--from selfish to selfless.
True and lasting repentance comes from God. I have no power on my own to turn and travel towards the ultimate goal--building the character of Jesus Christ.
It's no longer about my selfish and sinful ways. It is accepting Jesus into my heart, so He can turn me into a child of God from the inside out--from selfish to selfless.
True and lasting repentance comes from God. I have no power on my own to turn and travel towards the ultimate goal--building the character of Jesus Christ.
-
2
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Yes, I think that is the best understanding. It’s a course reversal. From “going your own way” to a realization that in doing so you are going the wrong direction. Then, there is sorrowful remorse for doing so for so long and an acknowledgment for the error and consequences that have come as a result of that path. Then— a turning away from that, to be directed by another, on a path not your own, by yielding to the will of the One who accepts you as His own. His child.
It’s like breaking a spirited horse. There is a moment when the bucking ceases and the animal realizes that resistance is futile- no longer in one’s own best interest. And it accepts the bit and bridle, and from there it can be directed and led and even so doing, find peace.
It’s like breaking a spirited horse. There is a moment when the bucking ceases and the animal realizes that resistance is futile- no longer in one’s own best interest. And it accepts the bit and bridle, and from there it can be directed and led and even so doing, find peace.
-
1
- Show all
The return of Christ will be quick. He will suddenly appear. When I saw him one day in 1982 he appeared quickly. His glorious countenance shining brightly. He revealed his name to me and his all power. He spoke in clear and understandable English. He was very kind. His visitation lasted maybe 1 minute. This does not mean necessarily that I am more spiritual than other saints or that I am an Apostle. I can however testify to those who doubt the Truth and assure them that Jesus lives forever.
Dont get me wrong.....I think we are EXTREMELY close to the rapture. There is massive demonic occultic exposure happening lately. Not to mention these unprecidented prophetic fulfillments.
Technological Signs relating to Christ’s Coming are being fulfilled. - Christian Chat Rooms & Forums
We are in the last seconds of these "last times" yes. But setting dates per se is strictly VERBOTEN. And just plain dumb. You will certainly be discredited and will be liable to defaming the Body of Christ.
Technological Signs relating to Christ’s Coming are being fulfilled. - Christian Chat Rooms & Forums
We are in the last seconds of these "last times" yes. But setting dates per se is strictly VERBOTEN. And just plain dumb. You will certainly be discredited and will be liable to defaming the Body of Christ.
-
1
- Show all
In the first few seconds of this false prophet's video, when he put the 70th week in our future, I shut it off. It is illogical to separate the 70th week from the 69th so as to force it into a man-made system.
A challenge to all you prophecy enthusiasts. Go to the online commentaries at https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng.html where you'll find 128 commentaries. Go though the commentaries on Daniel and note the date of the commentary. See at what time in history, when the 70th week of Daniel is thought to be separated from the first 69 weeks by over 2000 years. If anyone can find this taught prior to the mid-1800s, tell me in which commentary you find it.
Bullinger who received his theological training from 1860-1861, separates the 70th week.
Dr. Constable graduated from DTS in 1960 and separates the 70th week.
Read up on Arno C. Gaebelein here and notice the Zionist, Judaizing influences.
https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/gab.html
John Gill, 18th century pre-mil Baptist does not separate the 70th week over 2000 years from the 69th.
The Adam Clarke commentary published in 1825 reads on Daniel 9:25 -
From the coming of our Lord, the third period is to be dated, viz., "He shall confirm the covenant with many for one week," that is seven years, Da 9:27.
This confirmation of the covenant must take in the ministry of John the Baptist with that of our Lord, comprehending the term of seven years, during the whole of which he might be well said to confirm or ratify the new covenant with mankind. Our Lord says, "The law was until John;" but from his first public preaching the kingdom of God, or Gospel dispensation, commenced.
These seven years, added to the four hundred and eighty-three, complete the four hundred and ninety years, or seventy prophetic weeks; so that the whole of this prophecy, from the times and corresponding events, has been fulfilled to the very letter.
As far as I can find, Adam Clarke pretty much summarizes the understanding that the 490 weeks ended in the 1st century. The 70th week not separated from the 69th. If anyone can find early Bible scholars projecting the 70th week to our future, please give me a reference. Dispensationalism must be read into the Bible for you surely cannot find it taught in the Bible itself.
A challenge to all you prophecy enthusiasts. Go to the online commentaries at https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng.html where you'll find 128 commentaries. Go though the commentaries on Daniel and note the date of the commentary. See at what time in history, when the 70th week of Daniel is thought to be separated from the first 69 weeks by over 2000 years. If anyone can find this taught prior to the mid-1800s, tell me in which commentary you find it.
Bullinger who received his theological training from 1860-1861, separates the 70th week.
Dr. Constable graduated from DTS in 1960 and separates the 70th week.
Read up on Arno C. Gaebelein here and notice the Zionist, Judaizing influences.
https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/gab.html
John Gill, 18th century pre-mil Baptist does not separate the 70th week over 2000 years from the 69th.
The Adam Clarke commentary published in 1825 reads on Daniel 9:25 -
From the coming of our Lord, the third period is to be dated, viz., "He shall confirm the covenant with many for one week," that is seven years, Da 9:27.
This confirmation of the covenant must take in the ministry of John the Baptist with that of our Lord, comprehending the term of seven years, during the whole of which he might be well said to confirm or ratify the new covenant with mankind. Our Lord says, "The law was until John;" but from his first public preaching the kingdom of God, or Gospel dispensation, commenced.
These seven years, added to the four hundred and eighty-three, complete the four hundred and ninety years, or seventy prophetic weeks; so that the whole of this prophecy, from the times and corresponding events, has been fulfilled to the very letter.
As far as I can find, Adam Clarke pretty much summarizes the understanding that the 490 weeks ended in the 1st century. The 70th week not separated from the 69th. If anyone can find early Bible scholars projecting the 70th week to our future, please give me a reference. Dispensationalism must be read into the Bible for you surely cannot find it taught in the Bible itself.
-
1
- Show all
Nice TRY Mr Begg.
You have so much in right relation to the Scriptures. However because of your fault in following "tradition" you have a 49 and not a complete 50 year cycle. Can't you see the beauty of 6,000 or even 7,000 being divisible by 50's? Meaning Adam sined in year 1 of creation (Tishri-10th of creation Month-1) and the 2nd Adam Yeshua, will advent a 2nd time in Jubilee/Yovel year 6,001. Yeshua did not die and return to His place in the year 4,000 but 4,001 C.f., Hosea 5:15-6:2. It is possable, Yeshuah died in 30-AD meaning Adam sined when 5-days old Tishri-6 to on Tishri-10th as remorializing new-years-day for the 1st ever Yovel year of the Jubilee calendar in 3,971-BC?
Please stop doing math matical gymnastics and keep it simply Biblical.
You have so much in right relation to the Scriptures. However because of your fault in following "tradition" you have a 49 and not a complete 50 year cycle. Can't you see the beauty of 6,000 or even 7,000 being divisible by 50's? Meaning Adam sined in year 1 of creation (Tishri-10th of creation Month-1) and the 2nd Adam Yeshua, will advent a 2nd time in Jubilee/Yovel year 6,001. Yeshua did not die and return to His place in the year 4,000 but 4,001 C.f., Hosea 5:15-6:2. It is possable, Yeshuah died in 30-AD meaning Adam sined when 5-days old Tishri-6 to on Tishri-10th as remorializing new-years-day for the 1st ever Yovel year of the Jubilee calendar in 3,971-BC?
Please stop doing math matical gymnastics and keep it simply Biblical.
