What people? I see some trying to lump this into the LGBTQ+ while at the same time I see people in that community objecting, groups like "gays against groomers".Funny how people try to associate being gay with pedophilia but I live in Tennessee which has a very large Christian population in just a few years ago they tried to legalize child marriage.
Well if you're looking for child groomers look no further than the Catholic ChurchWhat people? I see some trying to lump this into the LGBTQ+ while at the same time I see people in that community objecting, groups like "gays against groomers".
As far as I can tell the vast majority of Christians consider LGBTQ to be lifestyle choices made by adults, so although they may agree with the Bible that it is sin, they don't view it as criminal. That is not true of pedophilia.
I am not aware of any Christian group that would publicly legitimize pedophilia. Even among the majority of atheists and agnostics it seems they view this as criminal.
The only group that may disagree may be Islam. It seems child brides are legitimized by some and would not be seen as a crime.
Can I see a link on this story.Well if you're looking for child groomers look no further than the Catholic Church
But just maybe two or three years ago Tennessee trying to remove age restrictions from marriage so had that passed, a Muslim would be able to marry a 5-year-old if he can get the parents permission. The Republicans are totally about family values right?
Well if you're looking for child groomers look no further than the Catholic Church
But just maybe two or three years ago Tennessee trying to remove age restrictions from marriage so had that passed, a Muslim would be able to marry a 5-year-old if he can get the parents permission. The Republicans are totally about family values right?
I'm afraid my social credit score is already in arrears.This question violates pagan religion on two counts.
1. You are not allowed to question evolution.
and
2. You are not allowed to question whether or not people are born homosexual.
As soon as they implement the social credit score you will be getting demerits for asking this question.
your question shows a lack of understanding regarding the basics of genetics.Questions: if homosexuality is genetic and homosexuals don't generally reproduce, wouldn't the genetic trait disappear over time as it is not passed on?
Or that I've studied Mendelian genetics. But, hey, what do teachers know?your question shows a lack of understanding regarding the basics of genetics.
Muslim Girls Can Marry At The Age Of 16: High Court Upholds Marriage Of Minor
https://www.outlookindia.com/nation...h-court-upholds-marriage-of-minor-news-203452
False. the vast majority of abortion providers are located in predominately white middle class neighborhoodsMmm humm eugenics would have bred out homosexuality, no purpose to their cause. They need to reproduce more like themselves. That's why abortion clinics are in the poorest section of every city, those are the people they want bred out of society.
There is good study on gay twins that support the idea that homosexuality is not genetic in the sense of being born that way. It did prove that environment has a lot to do with it. Environmental factors can harm us as well like damage to the brain or how some environments damages our genetic code. In relation to the sudden rise in LGBT girls it seems to be more peer pressure than legitimate dysphoria.Or that I've studied Mendelian genetics. But, hey, what do teachers know?
You are engaging in special pleading, a logical fallacy, you are saying marriage is for fertility but you refuse to apply that rule to the infertile showing your position isn't about having children at all.(neither do infertile heterosexuals. Are you saying people should have fertility tests before being allowed to get married? should anyone who can't biologically reproduce be denied the right to marry?)
Absolutely not. Remember my proven argument is that heterosexual marriages are still best for raising kids. There are still kids who need adoption.
false. Same sex marriage accounts for about 5% of all marriages but same ex divorce accounts for about 1.6% of all divorces. Ref UCLA school of lawHomosexual divorce rates are extremely high and the children miss one or the other biological parent. Not including psychological factor or confusing the next generation on marriage.
a claim without foundation is...basically useless.(well you woudl just have to prove that being gay is the equvelant to being morbidly obese. Good luck with that.)
Easy. Both are unhealthy lifestyles. Thank you for the luck.
Again special pleading(So the children of a police officer killed in teh line of duty should be removed from the surviving parent because otherwise they would suffer?)
Nope. But notice you admit to suffering. The child will suffer for awhile but more than likely the mom will remarry.
I posted a bit of research earlier in the thread that I found fascinatingThere is good study on gay twins that support the idea that homosexuality is not genetic in the sense of being born that way. It did prove that environment has a lot to do with it. Environmental factors can harm us as well like damage to the brain or how some environments damages our genetic code. In relation to the sudden rise in LGBT girls it seems to be more peer pressure than legitimate dysphoria.
I thought the point of survival of the fittest is that evolution is for the purpose of reproducing. The fittest survive and the less fit do not reproduce.your question shows a lack of understanding regarding the basics of genetics.
"The abortion rate for black women is almost five times that for white women."False. the vast majority of abortion providers are located in predominately white middle class neighborhoods
your reference here is a "survey conducted through gay dating sites"Gay men have multiple partners.
https://www.aidsmap.com/news/dec-20...gay-men-have-committed-relationships-just-one
If you like I can recommend some basic text on the subjects of genetics and evolution so you can educate yourself.I thought the point of survival of the fittest is that evolution is for the purpose of reproducing. The fittest survive and the less fit do not reproduce.
So it is strange that a trait that does not reproduce would survive.