Runningman said:
Sodom and Gomorrah definitely don’t exist anymore. The Bible says they are an example of what happens to ungodly people. How can ungodly people exist anymore if they are reduced to ashes?
Do you see that you cherry pick your interpretations to make them mean the opposite of what they do in order to prop up your belief that the unsaved somehow never die, are never destroyed, and somehow live forever in hell? Despite the clear words of Jesus that only those with faith in Him live forever. That’s chaos bro.
i see the flesh became ash, but don't read where the soul's were annihilated.
is this your own Theology
The other poster begins with S&G that "don't exists anymore". And uses what refers to cities as an example of what happens to those people. iow, the cities no longer exist, so the souls of people no longer exists.
Then he claims others "cherry pick" their interpretations.
Well, since he brought up S&G, he needs to face what Jesus said about the people of S&G:
Matt 11-
20 Then
Jesus began to denounce the towns in which most of his miracles had been performed, because they did not repent.
21 “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.
22 But I tell you, it will be more bearable for Tyre and Sidon on the day of judgment than for you.
23 And you, Capernaum, will you be lifted to the heavens? No, you will go down to Hades. For if the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Sodom, it would have remained to this day.
24 But I tell you that it will be more bearable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for you.”
If all the souls of the unsaved will simply cease to exist, why would there even be a difference in what is bearable?
What makes sense is the LEVEL of torment that the souls of the unsaved will experience that makes it either MORE or LESS bearable for some than othets.
I've already asked Rm to answer this, but of course, no answer.